Advertisement

Building on Norway’s Energy Goldmine: Policies for Expertise, Export, and Market Efficiencies

  • Tomas Moe SkjølsvoldEmail author
  • Marianne Ryghaug
  • Jon Dugstad
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 23)

Abstract

This chapter deals with the governance of renewable energy in Norway. The Norwegian case is a peculiar one. Norway has been blessed with an abundance of waterfalls, which for the past 100 years have been used to produce cheap and renewable electricity. In addition, Norway has vast oil resources which have been exported to generate national wealth. How does Norway’s odd position of on the one hand being one of the most renewable nations in Europe, while fuelling the world with hydrocarbons affect the governance of ‘new’ renewables? Does the fact that Norway is already one of Europe’s largest producers of renewable energy make a transition toward more renewable policy and production, easier or harder? What cultural, political, and financial factors seem to influence Norway’s strategies in the area of renewable energy production? Historically, energy in Norway has been both cheap and profitable, and Norwegian energy policies have traditionally been geared toward this goal: energy use and production should first and foremost be cost-effective. This situation has been challenging for the implementation of new renewable energy technologies. In the liberalized Norwegian electricity market, the governance of renewable energy has largely been left in the hands of the market participants. The low electricity prices over the past years have not attracted investment in renewables. In an attempt to mitigate this, Norway recently introduced electricity certificates in a joint market with Sweden, thereby creating a new class of incentives for investment in renewable energy generation. Further, to increase Norwegian renewable energy deployment, the Norwegian government has funded research and development projects and a number of large research centers for environmentally friendly technologies. However, there appears to be challenges in transferring the R&D activities to commercial products that could reach the market.

Keywords

Renewable Energy Wind Power Offshore Wind District Heating Renewable Energy Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adomaitis N (2012) Norway’s ambitious plans to boost wind power output to cut greenhouse gas emissions and diversify supplies are at risk because of low power prices and an underfunded subsidy scheme, industry sources say. ReutersGoogle Scholar
  2. Aune M (2007) Energy comes home. Energy Policy 35(11):5457–5465. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aune M, Ryghaug M, Godbolt ÅL (2011) Comfort, consciousness and costs—transitions in Norwegian energy culture 1991–2010. Energy efficiency first: the foundation of a low-carbon society. In: Proceedings of the ECEEE 2011 Summer StudyGoogle Scholar
  4. CenBio (2012) Cenbio—bioenergy innovation centre. Available via http://www.sintef.no/Projectweb/CENBIO/
  5. Devine-Wright P (2009) Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. J Comm Appl Soc Psychol 19(6):426–441. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geels FW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33(6–7):897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gjerald OI (2012) Fornybare strategiar? Innovasjon, implementering og kommersialisering for ny fornybar energi. Vestlandsforskning, SogndalGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen GH, Steen M (2011) Vindkraft til havs. Teknologi-og industriutvikling fra et norsk bedriftsperspektiv. Trondheim, CenSesGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanson J (2011) Innmatingstariffer—marked som læringsarena. In: Hanson J, Kasa, S, Wicken O (eds) Energirikdommens paradokser. Innovasjon som klimapolitikk og læringsutvikling. Oslo, UniversitetsforlagetGoogle Scholar
  10. Karlstrøm H (2010) Den deregularte forbruker. Norske strømforbrukeres holdninger til strømmarkedet, fornybar energi og bærekraftig kraftproduksjon. NTNU, institutt for tverrfaglige, kulturstudierGoogle Scholar
  11. Karlstrøm H (2012a) Empowering markets?: the construction and maintenance of a deregulated market for electricity in Norway, vol 79. Trondheim, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitetGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlstrøm H (2012b) Norge—Europas Grønne Batteri. Manifest tidsskriftGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasa S (2011) Klimakamp blir innovasjonspolitikk. In: Hanson J, Kasa, S, Wicken O (eds) Energirikdommens paradokser. Innovasjon som klimapolitikk og læringsutvikling. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  14. KRD (2008) Ot.prp. nr. 45 Om lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling (plan- og bygningsloven) (byggesaksdelen). Ed. Ministry of local and regional developmentGoogle Scholar
  15. NORCOWE Vision (2012) Available via http://norcowe.no/index.cfm?id=229099
  16. NOU (2006) Norges offentlige Utredninger 2006: 18. Et klimavennlig NorgeGoogle Scholar
  17. OED (2006) St.meld. nr. 11 (2006–2007). Om støtteordningen for elektrisitetsproduksjon fra fornybare energikilder (fornybar elektrisitet). Ed. Ministry of petroleum and energyGoogle Scholar
  18. OED (2008) Strategi for økt utbygging av bioenergi. Olje- og EnergidepartementetGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenberg N (1994) Exploring the black box. Technology, economics and history. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Rygg B (2012) Local governments’ engagement with bioenergy. Paper given at Innovation and learning in energy policy: new pathways to sustainability. Trondheim, December 12–14, 2012Google Scholar
  21. Ryghaug M, Sørensen KH (2009) How energy efficiency fails in the building industry. Energy Policy 37(3):984–991. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skjølsvold TM (2012) Towards a new sociology of innovation: the case of bioenergy in Norway and Sweden, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  23. SSB (2011) Fjernvarmestatistikk 2010. Sterk økning i fjernvarmeforbruket. Statistics Norway, Oslo. Available via http://www.ssb.no/fjernvarme/
  24. Sørensen KH (2007) Fra “hvite kull” til grønn varme? Utfordringer for energi. In: Sørensen KH, Aune M (eds) Mellom Klima og komfort. Utfordringer for en bærekraftig teknologiutvikling. Tapir Akademisk Forlag, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  25. Tamnes R (1997) Oljealder. 1965–1995, Norsk utenrikspolitikks historie. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  26. UNDP (2011) Human development report 2011. sustainability and equity: a better future for AllGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomas Moe Skjølsvold
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marianne Ryghaug
    • 1
  • Jon Dugstad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of CultureNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Norwegian Renewable Energy Partners—INTPOWOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations