Advertisement

Geopolitics, Climate Change and Energy Governance: A Grey Area in the Black Sea Region

  • Jeremy Maxwell HillsEmail author
  • Evanthie Michalena
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Energy book series (LNEN, volume 23)

Abstract

The Black Sea region is diverse, not entirely autonomous and geopolitically tense; however it produces, or transports across its area, significant fossil fuels to the EU market and further afield. The twelve countries of the area which form the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) have recently adopted Declarations which target climate change, green economy and renewable energy. The EU has long been operating in the region due to its strategic importance, primarily in the areas of energy, environment and governance; although direct programme success has been limited. The chapter focusses on the question: can a route be devised which uses the strengths of each organisation and effectively aligns both BSEC and EU to a regionalised approach to renewable energy (RE) development? The chapter considers the historical developments in the region by these regional players as well as the benefits and constraints of a regional renewable energy approach. The McKinsey 7S model is used to compare BSEC and EU in their RE approaches which demonstrates significant differences of intention, strategy, operation and capacity to implement. Based on these institutional differences, a third approach is developed in which these two organisations could work together based on their institutional strengths for RE regionalisation.

Keywords

Renewable Energy Green Economy Climate Change Response Energy Efficiency Project Energy Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Dimadama Z, Timotheou A (2010) Greening the black sea: overcoming in efficiency and fragmentation through environmental governance. In: International Centre for Black Sea Studies (ICBSS), Policy Brief no. 21Google Scholar
  2. Karbuz S (2010) Losing the energy battle: how and why the US and EU need to engage the black sea region, J Energy Secur 1(1):1–13. Available via http://www.ensec.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=255:losing-the-battle-why-and-how-the-united-states-and-europe-need-to-engage-the-black-sea-region&catid=108:energysecuritycontent&Itemid=365
  3. Kottari M, Popovici V, Wisniewski J (2013) Energy politics, pipelines and the Black Sea Basin: on the route to diversification of EU energy sources. Strategy paper, vol 4, Young Researchers SeriesGoogle Scholar
  4. Michalena E, Angeon V (2009) Local challenges in the promotion of renewable energy sources: the case of crete. Energy Policy 37:2018–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pavliuk O (2004) The Black Sea Region—cooperation and security building. In: Pavliuk O, Klympush-Tsintsadze I (eds) East West Institute Editions, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  6. Waterman R, Peters T, Phillips J (1980) Structure is not organization. Bus Horiz 23:14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CTL Consult LtdMorpethUK
  2. 2.ENeC Laboratory, UMR 8185Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV) and CNRS INSHSParisFrance
  3. 3.Regulatory Authority for EnergyAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations