Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rebound Effects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unintended Consequences of Renewable Energy

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Rebound effects, also known as take-back effects, refer to the behavioral or systemic responses that can be experienced after a new technology or policy measure has been implemented. Such rebound effects have been experienced from efforts to reduce energy use, climate emissions, and other pollutants as well as polluting behavior. This chapter presents a detailed account of the concept of rebound effects and presents examples of different areas where rebound effects are observed. The chapter also discusses the usefulness and limitations of the concept rebound effects in relation to improving the knowledge of the unintended consequences of renewable energy. Finally, potential rebound effects connected to nanomaterials used in new types of energy harvesting technologies are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Electricity mixture is a term used for describing the composition of the electricity, with respect to how the electricity is produced. The electricity mixture for Norway is >90 % hydroelectric, while for China it is about 20 % hydroelectric and 70 % fossil sources (mainly coal power).

  2. 2.

    “World Energy Outlook” 2006 [25].

References

  1. 4CMR (2006) The macroeconomic rebound effect and the UK economy, report for Defra. Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research (4CMR), in collaboration with Cambridge Econometrics (CE) Ltd., Policy Studies Institute (PSI) and Horace Herring from the Open University

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barker T, Dagoumas A, Rubin J (2009) The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energ Effi 2:411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentzen J (2004) Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energy Econ 26:123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chertow MR (2001) The IPAT equation and its variants. J Ind Ecol 4(4). http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~anthro/articles/jiec_4_4_13_0.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  5. Commoner B (1972) The environmental cost of economic growth. In: Population, resources, and the environment. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 339–363

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dandres T, Gaudreault C, Tirado-Seco P, Samson R (2011) Assessing non-marginal variations with consequential LCA: application to European energy sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(6):3121–3132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Fence J, Hanley N, Turner K (2009) Do productivity improvements move us along the environmental Kuznets Curve? IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. http://ideas.repec.org/p/stl/stledp/2009-02.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  8. Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171(3977):1212–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fölster S, Nyström J (2010) Climate policy to defeat the green paradox. Ambio 39(3):223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fortner J, Lyon D, Sayes C, Boyd A, Falkner J, Hotze E (2005) C60 in water: nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environ Sci Technol 39:4307–4316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franco A, Salza P (2011) Strategies for optimal penetration of intermittent renewables in complex energy systems based on techno-operational objectives. Renew Energy 36:743–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frosch R, Gallopoulos N (1989) Strategies for manufacturing. Sci Am:94–102

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gillingham K, Kotchen M, Rapson D, Wagner G (2013) The rebound effect is overplayed. Nature 493:475–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gottron F (2001) Energy efficiency and the rebound effect: does increasing efficiency decrease demand? CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service/The Library of Congress

    Google Scholar 

  15. Greening L, Greene D, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28(6–7):389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grepperud S, Rasmussen I (2004) A general equilibrium view of global rebound effects. Energy Econ 26(2):261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guinee J, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haugland T (1996) Social benefits of financial investment support in energy conservation policy. Energy J 17(2):79–102

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herring H (2006) Energy efficiency—a critical view. Energy 31:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herring H (2006b) Jevons paradox. Encyclopedia of Earth. Washington, D.C: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment. http://www.eoearth.org/article/Jevons_paradox. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  21. Herring H, Roy R (2007) Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect. Technovation 27(4):194–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective. J Ind Ecol 9(1–2):85–98

    Google Scholar 

  23. Holm S-O, Englund G (2009) Increased ecoefficiency and gross rebound effect: evidence from USA and six European countries 1960–2002. Ecol Econ 68:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Høyer KG (1997) Recycling: issues and possibilities. In: Brune D, Chapman D, Gwynne M, Pacyna J (eds) The global environment. Science, technology and management. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Weinheim, pp 817–832

    Google Scholar 

  25. IEA (2006) World energy outook 2006. International Energy Agency, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. IPCC (2001) Third Assessment Report (TAR) of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) prepared by Working Group III: Climate Change 2001: mitigation. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/index.php?idp=144. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  27. IPCC (2012) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report/IPCC_SRREN_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  28. Jevons W (1865) The coal question. Macmillan and Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keoleian G, Kar K, Manion M, Bulkley J (1997) Industrial ecology of the automobile. A life cycle perspective. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khazzoom J (1980) Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy J 1(4):21–40

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kwok K, Leung K, Flahaut E, Cheng J, Cheng S (2010) Chronic toxicity of double-walled carbon nanotubes to three marine organisms: influence of different dispersion methods. Nanomedicine 5(6):951–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lam C-W, James J, McCluskey R, Arepalli S, Hunter R (2006) A review of carbon nanotube toxicity and assessment of potential occupational and environmental health risks. Crit Rev Toxicol 36(3):189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lovins A (2011) RE: The Efficiency Dilemma A letter in response to David Owen’s article (December 20 & 27, 2010) (January 17.). The New Yorker. http://www.rmi.org/cms/Download.aspx?id=4952&file=2011-01_ReplyToNewYorker.pdf&title=Reply+to+%22The+Efficiency+Dilemma%22. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  34. Madlener R, Alcott B (2009) Energy rebound and economic growth:a review of the main issues and research needs. Energy 34:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Manzetti S, Andersen O (2012) Toxicological aspects of nanomaterials used in energy harvesting consumer electronics. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(1):2102–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Manzetti S, Andersen O (2013) Carbon nanotubes in electronics: background and discussion for waste-handling strategies. Challenges 4(1):75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Manzetti S, Behzadi H, Andersen O, van der Spool D (2013) Fullerenes toxicity and electronic properties. Environ Chem Lett 11(2):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Maxwell D, Owen P, McAndrew L, Muehmel K and Neubauer A (2011) Addressing the Rebound Effect. A project for the European Commission DG Environment. Final report. Ivry-sur-Seine, France: Bio Intelligence Service—Scaling sustainable development. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/rebound_effect_report.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  39. Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens III W (1972) The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mersiowsky I, Krähling H (2002) Life cycle assessment of high-performance thermal insulation systems for domestic buildings. Paper presented at the InLCA-LCM 2002. American Center for Life Cycle Assessment. http://www.lcacenter.org/lca-lcm/session-lca.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  41. Nässén J, Holmberg J (2009) Quantifying the rebound effects of energy efficiency improvements and energy conserving behaviour in Sweden. Energ Effi 2:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Odum E (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Odum H (1971) Environment, Power, and Society. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ohta H, Fujii S (2011) Does purchasing an ‘Eco-car’ promote increase in car-driving distance?. Unpublished Paper from the Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  45. Owen D (2010) The efficiency dilemma. If our machines use less energy, will we just use them more? (December 20.). The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/20/101220fa_fact_owen. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  46. Owen D (2012) The Conundrum. How scientific innovation, increased efficiency, and good intentions can make our energy and climate problems worse. Penguin Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pérez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Velázquez D (2013) Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals. Energ Effi 6(2):239–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Peters A, Sonnberger M, Dütschke E, Deuschle J (2012) Theoretical perspective on rebound effects from a social science point of view—Working Paper to prepare empirical psychological and sociological studies in the REBOUND project. Sraunhofer ISI. http://kooperationen.zew.de/en/rebound/results.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  49. Qiao R, Roberts A, Mount A, Klaine S, Ke P (2007) Translocation of C60 and its derivatives across a lipid bilayer. Nano Lett 7:614–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rajagopal D, Hochman G, Zilberman D (2011) Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the life cycle environmental impact of biofuel policies. Energy Policy 39:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Reinhard J, Zah R (2009) Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment. J Cleaner Prod 17(SUPPL. 1):46–56

    Google Scholar 

  52. Santarius T (2012) Green growth unraveled. How rebound effects baffle sustainability targets when the economy keeps growing. Heinrich Böll Stiftung and Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Berlin (25)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Saunders H (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J 13:131–148

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saunders H (2000) A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 28:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schmidt J (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schneider F (2008) Macroscopic rebound effect as argument for economic degrowth. Paper presented at the First international conference on Economic De-growth for Ecological Sustainability and Social Equity, Paris, April 18–19th 2008. Paris. http://events.it-sudparis.eu/degrowthconference/themes/1First%20panels/Backgrounds/Schneider%20F%20Degrowth%20Paris%20april%202008%20paper.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  57. Shvedova A, Kisin E, Mercer R, Murray A, Johnson V, Potapovich A, Tyurina Y, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Schwegler-Berry D, Hubbs A, Antonini J, Evans D, Ku B, Ramsey D, Maynard A, Kagan V, Castranova V, Baron P (2005) Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289:698–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. A report produced by the Sussex Energy Group for the Technology and Policy Assessment function of the UK Energy Research Centre. UK Energy Research Centre. http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/Downloads/PDF/07/0710ReboundEffect/0710ReboundEffectReport.pdf. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  59. Sorrell S (2010) Energy, economic growth and environmental sustainability: five propositions. Sustainability 2:1784–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Steinberger J, van Niel J, Bourg D (2009) Profiting from negawatts: reducing absolute consumption and emissions through a performance-based energy economy. Energy Policy 37:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Stocker A, Grossman A, Madlener R, Wolter M (2011) Sustainable energy development in Austria until 2020: Insights from applying the integrated model e3.at. Energy Policy 39:6082–6099

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stoft S (2010) Renewable fuel and the global rebound effect. Global energy policy center research paper No. 10–06. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636911. Accessed 17 Sep 2013

  63. Teeguarden J, Webb-Robertson B, Waters K, Murray A, Kisin E, Varnum S, Jacobs J, Pounds J, Zanger R, Shvedova A (2011) Comparative proteomics and pulmonary toxicity of instilled single-walled carbon nanotubes, crocidolite asbestos, and ultrafine carbon black in mice. Toxicol Sci 120(1):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Thiesen J, Christensen T, Kristensen T, Andersen R, Brunoe B, Gregersen T, Thrane M, Weidema B (2008) Rebound effects of price differences. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Velzeboer I, Kupryianchyk D, Peeters E, Koelmans A (2011) Community effects of carbon nanotubes in aquatic sediments. Environ Int 37:1126–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. West J, Bailey I, Winter M (2010) Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach. Energy Policy 38:5739–5748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zehner O (2011) Unintended consequences of green technologies. In: Robbins et al (eds) Green technology. Sage, London 427–432

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Western Norway Research Institute, Kaupanger, Norway

    Otto Andersen

Authors
  1. Otto Andersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otto Andersen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andersen, O. (2013). Rebound Effects. In: Unintended Consequences of Renewable Energy. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5532-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5532-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5531-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5532-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation