Skip to main content

Error Recovery in the Wilderness of ICU

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine

Abstract

Our previous investigations of error detection and correction in a laboratory setting (in-vitro) using error-embedded tasks show that individual physicians identified less than 50 % of the errors [1]. Experts corrected the errors as soon as they detected them and were better able to detect errors requiring integration of multiple elements in the case. Residents were more cautious in making decisions showing a slower error recovery pattern, and the detected errors were more procedural in nature with specific patient outcomes. In this study, error detection and correction are shown to be dependent on expertise, and on the nature of the everyday tasks of the clinicians, given that experts make top level decisions, while residents take care of patient-related problems on day-to-day basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Patel VL, Cohen T, Murarka T, Olsen J, Kagita S, Myneni S, et al. Recovery at the edge of error: debunking the myth of the infallible expert. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(3):413–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL. Bridging gaps in handoffs: a continuity of care approach. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(2):240–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lipshitz R, Klein GA, Orasanu J, Salas E. Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. J Behav Decis Mak. 2001;14:331–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reason J. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Dekker S. The field guide to understanding human error. 2nd ed. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kontogiannis T, Malakis S. A proactive approach to human error detection and identification in aviation and air traffic control. Saf Sci. 2009;47(5):693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kontogiannis T. A framework for the analysis of cognitive reliability in complex systems: a recovery centered approach. Reliability Eng Syst Saf. 1998;58:233–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orasanu J. Crew collaboration in space: a naturalistic decision-making perspective. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76(6, Section II):B154–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orasanu J, Martin L, editors. Errors in aviation decision making: a factor in accidents and incidents. Second workshop on human error, safety, and system development. Seattle, Washington; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meso P, Troutt MD, Rudnicka J. A review of naturalistic decision making research with implications for knowledge management. J Knowl Manage. 2002;6(1):63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon HA. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. In: Simon HA, editor. Models of man. New York: John Wiley; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klein GA. Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):456–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plant KL, Stanton NA. Why did the pilots shut down the wrong engine? Explaining errors in context using schema theory and the perceptual cycle model. Saf Sci. 2012;50(2):300–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oser R, McCallum G, Salas E, Morgan BBJ. Toward a definition of teamwork: an analysis of critical team behaviors division HF; 1989. Contract no.: 89-004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics. 2000;43(8):1052–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiore SM, Rosen MA, Smith-Jentsch KA, Salas E, Letsky M, Warner N. Toward an understanding of macrocognition in teams: predicting processes in complex collaborative contexts. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2010;52(2):203–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen C, Larson JR. Collaborative medical decision making. Med Decis Mak. 1993;13(4):339–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tschan F, Semmer NK, Gurtner A, Bizzari L, Spychiger M, Breuer M, et al. Explicit reasoning, confirmation bias, and illusory transactive memory: a simulation study of group medical decision making. Small Group Res. 2009;40(3):271–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abraham J, Nguyen VC, Almoosa KF, Patel B, Patel VL. Falling through the cracks: information breakdowns in critical care handoff communication. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA); 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larson JR, Christensen C, Abbott AS, Franz TM. Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(2):315–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Magder SA. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic environments. In: Ericsson A, editor. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers; 1996. p. 127–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kubose TT, Patel VL, Jordan D, editors. Dynamic adaptation to critical care medical environment: error recovery as cognitive activity. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Cognitive Science Society. Fairfax, Virginia; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel B, Almoosa KF, Patel VL, editors. Ensuring patient safety in care transitions: an empirical evaluation of a handoff intervention tool. Chicago: Proceedings of AMIA 2012; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL. The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(11–12):801–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. Diagnostic reasoning and medical expertise. In: The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol. 31. San Diego, CA Academic Press; 1994. p. 137–252.

    Google Scholar 

  26. George AL, McKeown TJ. Case studies and theories of organizational decision making. Adv Inf Process Org. 1985;2:21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Owen WF. Interpretive themes in relational communication. Q J Speech. 1984;70:274–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Apker J, Mallak LA, Gibson SC. Communicating in the “gray zone:” perceptions of emergency physician-hospitalist handoff communication and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:884–994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel VL, Evans DA, Groen GJ. Biomedical knowledge and clinical reasoning. In: Evans DA, Patel VL, editors. Cognitive science in medicine: biomedical modeling. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1989. p. 53–112.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Allen VG, Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, Greenes RA. Toward a framework for computer-mediated collaborative design in medical informatics. Methods Inf Med. 1999;38:158–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vimla L. Patel PhD, DSc, FRSC .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patel, V.L., Shine, A.L., Almoosa, K.F. (2014). Error Recovery in the Wilderness of ICU. In: Patel, V., Kaufman, D., Cohen, T. (eds) Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5490-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics