Reflections on the Role of Cognitive Science in Biomedical Informatics

Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


Decision making is an inherent part of everything that health professionals do, and accordingly it is not surprising that cognitive science has relevance throughout all of patient care, health promotion, and disease prevention. Even the procedural specialties that depend on manual dexterity or similar skills, such as surgery, intrinsically depend on making good decisions about which procedures to perform, when to undertake them, and how best to prepare patients for what will be required. Many tough decisions carry over to prevention and public health: how best to advise patients, how best to encourage healthy behaviors, and how best to react when surveillance suggests that new attacks on the health and safety of the population may exist.


Cognitive Science Bacterial Meningitis Biomedical Informatics Informatics Research Cognitive Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach it. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wennberg JE. Practice variation: implications for our health care system. Manag Care. 2004;13(9 Suppl):3–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Medical Informatics Association. Bethesda, MD. Available from: Cited 7 Jul 2013.
  5. 5.
    Kuikowski CA, Shortliffe EH, Currie LM, Elkin PL, Hunter LE, Johnson TR, et al. AMIA board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):931–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shortliffe EH. President’s column: subspecialty certification in clinical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(6):890–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. A primer on aspects of cognition for medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(4):324–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horsky J, Schiff GD, Johnston D, Mercincavage L, Bell D, Middleton B. Interface design principles for usable decision support: a targeted review of best practices for clinical prescribing interventions. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(6):1202–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McNeil BJ, Adelstein SJ. Measures of clinical efficacy: the value of case finding in hypertensive renovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(5):221–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNeil BJ, Keller E, Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(5):211–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McNeil BJ, Varady PD, Burrows BA, Adelstein SJ. Measures of clinical efficacy: cost-effectiveness calculations in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive renovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(5):216–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwartz WB, Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Essig A. Decision analysis and clinical judgment. Am J Med. 1973;55(3):459–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Essig A, Schwartz WB. Decision analysis as the basis for computer-aided management of acute rental failure. Am J Med. 1973;55(3):473–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shortliffe EH. Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN. New York: American Elsevier; 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duda RO, Shortliffe EH. Expert systems research. Science. 1983;220(4594):261–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scott AC, Clayton JE, Gibson EL. A practical guide to knowledge acquisition. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pauker SG, Gorry GA, Kassirer JP, Schwartz WB. Towards the simulation of clinical cognition: taking a present illness by computer. Am J Med. 1976;60(7):981–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Canada: Elsevier B.V. Available from: Cited 7 Jul 2013.
  19. 19.
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2010. Available from: Cited 7 Jul 2013.
  20. 20.
    Schwartz WB, Patil RS, Szolovits P. Artificial intelligence in medicine: where do we stand? N Engl J Med. 1987;316:685–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shortliffe EH. The adolescence of AI in medicine: will the field come of age in the ‘90s? Artif Intell Med. 1993;5(2):93–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patel VL, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M, Szolovits P, Berthold MR, Bellazzi R, et al. The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artif Intell Med. 2009;46(1):5–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Society for Medical Decision Making. Available from: Cited 7 July 2013.
  25. 25.
    Shortliffe EH, Barnett GO, Cimino JJ, Greenes RA, Huff SM, Patel VL. Collaborative medical informatics research using the internet and the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Symp. 1996:125–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hripcsak G, Ludemann P, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB, Clayton PD. Rationale for the Arden syntax. Comput Biomed Res. 1994;27(4):291–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Open Clinical KMfMC. Guideline Modelling Methods Technologies. New York, 2006. Available from: Cited 8 Jul 2013.
  28. 28.
    Shortliffe EH, Patel VL, Cimino JJ, Barnett GO, Greenes RA. A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories. Artif Intell Med. 1998;12(2):97–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy SN, Jain NL, Tu SW, Oliver DE, et al. The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1988;5(4):357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Patel VL, Allen VG, Arocha JF, Shortliffe EH. Representing a clinical guideline in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5:467–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Patel VL, Arocha JF, Diemeier M, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. Methods of cognitive analysis to support the design and evaluation of biomedical systems: the case of clinical practice guidelines. J Biomed Inform. 2001;34(1):52–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Patel VL, Gutnik LA, Yoskowitz NA, O'Sullivan LF, Kaufman DR. Patterns of reasoning and decision making about condom use by urban college students. AIDS Care. 2006;18(8):918–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patel VL, Yoskowitz NA, Kaufman DR. Comprehension of sexual situations and its relationship to risky decisions by young adults. AIDS Care. 2007;19(7):916–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang J, Patel VL, Johnsen TR, Shortliffe EH. A cognitive taxonomy of medical errors. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37(3):193–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Horsky J, Zhang J, Patel VL. To err is not entirely human: complex technology and user cognition. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(4):264–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Keselman A, Patel VL, Johnson TR, Zhang J. Institutional decision-making to select patient care devices: identifying venues to promote patient safety. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(1–2):31–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform. 2004;37(1):56–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL. Bridging gaps in handoffs: a continuity of care approach. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(2):240–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vankipuram M, Kahol K, Cohen T, Patel VL. Toward automated workflow analysis and visualization in clinical environments. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(3):432–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keselman A, Slaughter L, Patel VL. Toward a framework for understanding lay public’s comprehension of disaster and bioterrorism information. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38:331–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kahol K, Buchman T, Patel VL. Biomedical complexity and error. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(3):387–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Patel VL, Yoskowitz NA, Arocha JF, Shortliffe EH. Cognitive and learning sciences in biomedical and health instructional design: a review with lessons for biomedical informatics education. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(1):176–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Health SolutionsArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical InformaticsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public HealthWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations