Skip to main content

Investigating Shared Mental Models in Critical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Clinical care is increasingly recognized as a highly collaborative practice [1]. The complexity of modern medicine, particularly of intensive care, requires deep specialization and honing of skills and expertise that can take years to acquire. As a result, clinical teams in intensive care units can include over a dozen of specialists, each contributing their unique knowledge to the overall patient care. And while speedy and successful patient recovery is an underlying objective of their combined efforts, each specialist may have their own goals and priorities, dictated by their training, experience, and focus.

A version of this chapter is under review: Mamykina L, Twohig B, Sheehan B, Hum RS, Kaufman DR, Measuring shared mental models in critical care: methodological perspective, under review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Elsevier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vazirani S, Hays RD, Shapiro MF, Cowan M. Effect of a multidisciplinary intervention on communication and collaboration among physicians and nurses. Am J Crit Care. 2005;14(1):71–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:410–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baggs JG, Ryan SA, Phelps CE, Richeson JF, Johnson JE. The association between interdisciplinary collaboration and patient outcomes in a medical intensive care unit. Heart Lung. 1992;21(1):18–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shortell SM, Zimmerman JE, Rousseau DM, Gillies RR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference? Med Care. 1994;32(5):508–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain M, Miller L, Belt D, King D, Berwick DM. Decline in ICU adverse events, nosocomial infections and cost through a quality improvement initiative focusing on teamwork and culture change. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(4):235–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wheelan SA, Burchill CN, Tilin F. The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12(6):527–34. PubMed PMID: 14619358. Epub 2003/11/19. eng.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(3):277–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Custer JW, White E, Fackler JC, Xiao Y, Tien A, Lehmann H, et al. A qualitative study of expert and team cognition on complex patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13(3):278–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu L, Cirimele J, Card S, Klemmer S, Chu L, Harrison K. Maintaining shared mental models in anesthesia crisis care with nurse tablet input and large-screen displays. Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User Interface Systems and Technologies, UIST’11. California, USA: Santa Barbara; 2011. p. 71–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooke N, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Stout R. Measuring team knowledge. Hum Factors. 2000;42:151–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Magder SA. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic environments. In: Ericsson A, editor. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers; 1996. p. 127–65.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooke NJ, Gorman JC, Rowe LJ. An ecological perspective on team cognition. In: Salas E, Goodwin J, Burke CS, editors. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches, SIOP organizational frontiers series. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2009. p. 157–82.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Revere A, Eldridge N. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) national patient safety goals for 2008. Topics Patient Saf. 2008;12(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, Banna A, Thorpe ME. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2002;176(9):415–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eldridge N, Revere A. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) national patient safety goals for 2005. Topics Patient Saf. 2005;5(1):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams MD, Hollan JD, Stevens AL. Human reasoning about a simple physical system. In: Genter D, Stevens AL, editors. Mental models. Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Publishers; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patel VL, Kaufman DR. Cognitive science and biomedical informatics. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, editors. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 133–85.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse SA. Shared mental models in expert decision-making. In: Castellan Jr NJ, editor. Individual and group decision making. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers; 1993. p. 221–46.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Orasanu J. Shared mental models and crew performance. 34th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Orlando; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley SD, editors. Percpectives in socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1991. p. 127–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Nenkova A, Passonneau R, McKeown K. The pyramid method: incorporating human content selection variation in summarization evaluation. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing. 2007;4(2).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mamykina LM, Hum RS, Sheehan B, Twohig B, Kaufman DR. Measuring shared mental models of critical care teams: a methodological perspective. J Biomed Inform. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lim B-C, Klein KJ. Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J Organ Behav. 2006;27:403–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Mamykina PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mamykina, L., Hum, R.S., Kaufman, D.R. (2014). Investigating Shared Mental Models in Critical Care. In: Patel, V., Kaufman, D., Cohen, T. (eds) Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5490-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics