Skip to main content

Falling Through the Cracks: Investigation of Care Continuity in Critical Care Handoffs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1253 Accesses

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

A handoff, in lay terms, refers to the act or instance of handing or transferring something to another person (to complete/to do). For instance, you hand the baton off to the next runner in a relay race. Handoffs are an everyday yet essential process in high-reliability, safety-critical settings that operate around the clock, such as between shifts at space shuttle mission controls [1, 2], nuclear power plants [3], railroad dispatch centers [4] and hospitals [5]. Regardless of the type of setting, a well-executed handoff process helps to maintain the continuity of work across shifts and between workers.

Portions of this chapter has been adapted from Abraham et al. Bridging gaps in handoffs: A continuity of care based approach, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(2), 240–54, with permissions from Elsevier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Patterson ES, Woods DD. Shift changes, updates, and the on-call architecture in space shuttle mission control. Comput Support Coop Work. 2001;10(3–4):317–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Helmreich RL, Foushee HC. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors in aviation. In: Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, editors. Cockpit resource management. San Diego: Academic Press; 1993. p. 3–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mumaw RJ, Roth EM, Vicente KJ, Burns CM. There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye. Hum Factors. 2000;42:36–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roth EM, Lin L, Kerch S, Kenney SJ, Sugibayashi N. Designing a first-of-a-kind group view display for team decision making: a case study. In: Salas E, Klein G, editors. Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2001. p. 113–35.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson ES, Roth EM, Woods DD, Chow R, Orlando-Gomes J. Handoff strategies in settings with consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations. International J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:125–32. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strople B, Ottani P. Can technology improve intershift report?: What the research reveals. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(3):197–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arora V, Johnson J, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ. A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):11–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Riesenberg L, Leitzsch J, Massucci J, Jaeger J, Rosenfeld J, Patow C, et al. Residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 2009;84(12):1775–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). National patient safety goals. Critical Access Hospital and Hospital National Patient Safety Goals [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.neodevices.com/resources/CR_NationalPatientSafetyGoals.pdf

  10. Smith AF, Pope C, Goodwin D, Mort M. Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room. Br J Anaesthesiol. 2008;101(3):332–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Borowitz SM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(1):6–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Powell SK. Handoffs and transitions of care: where is the lone ranger’s silver bullet? Prof Case Manag. 2006;11(5):235–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarado K, Lee R, Christoffersen E, Fram N, Boblin S, Poole N, et al. Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety. Healthc Q. 2006;9:75–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Staggers N, Jennings BM. The content and context of change of shift report on medical and surgical units. J Nurs Adm. 2009;39(9):393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Craig SS. Challenges in arranging inter-hospital transfers from a small regional hospital: an obvervational study. Emerg Med Austr. 2005;17(2):124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(5):352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horwitz LI, Meredith T, Schuur JD, Shah NR, Kulkarni RG, Jenq GY. Dropping the baton: a qualitative analysis of failures during the transition from emergency department to inpatient care. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(6):701–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(2):143–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leape LL, Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Cooper J, Demonaco HJ, Gallivan T, et al. Systems analysis of adverse drug events. JAMA. 1995;274(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Roth EM. Analysis of decision-making in nuclear power plant emergencies: an investigation of aided decision-making. in C. Zsambok and G. Klien (eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL. Bridging gaps in handoffs: a continuity of care approach. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(2):240–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutcliffe K, Lewton E, Rosenthal M. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79(2):186–94. doi:10.1097/00001888-200402000-00019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Riesenberg LA, Leitzsch J, Little BW. Systematic review of handoff mnemonics literature. Am J Med Qual. 2009;24(3):196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Staggers N. An integrative review of research on nursing handoffs in acute care settings… transitions: unifying practice, education, and research to improve health: communicating nursing research conference and win assembly, April 13-16, 2011, rio all-suites hotel, las Vegas, nv. Commun Nurs Res. 2011;44:27–42. PubMed PMID: 2011383867. Language: English. Entry Date: 20120406. Revision Date: 20120406. Publication Type: journal article.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Staggers N, Jennings BM. The content and context of change of shift report on medical and surgical units. J Nurs Adm. 2009;39(9):393–8. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181b3b63a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abraham J, Kannampallil T, Patel VL. A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: Implications for research and practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc amiajnl-2012-001351 Published Online First: 23 May 2013 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001351.

  27. Cheung DS, Kelly JJ, Beach C, Berkeley RP, Bitterman RA, Broida RI, et al. Improving handoffs in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;55(2):171–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patterson ES, Wears RL. Patient handoffs: standardized and reliable tools remain elusive. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):52–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arora V, Johnson J, Meltzer D, Humphrey H. A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:11–4. doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.018952.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Manias E, Street A. The handover: uncovering the hidden practices of nurses. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2000;16(6):373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Crocker C. Following the patient journey to improve medicines management and reduce errors. Nurs Times. 2009;105(46):12–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Apker J, Mallak L, Gibson S. Communicating in the “gray zone”: perceptions about emergency physician hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(10):884–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Arora J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(6):401–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith AF, Pope C, Goodwin D, Mort M. Interprofessional handover and patient safety in anaesthesia: observational study of handovers in the recovery room. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(3):332–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Philibert I. Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(4):261–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Berkenstadt H, Haviv Y, Tuval A, Shemesh Y, Megrill A, Perry A, et al. Improving handoff communications in critical care. Chest. 2008;134(1):158–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green R, Zhang J, Patel VL. The multitasking clinician: decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:801–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nemeth CP, Cook RI, Kowalsky J, Brandwijk M. Understanding Sign Outs: Conversation analysis reveals ICU handoff content and form. Critical Care Medicine 2004;32(12), Supplement:A29.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Streitenberger K, Breen-Reid K, Harris C. Handoffs in care–can we make them safer? Pediatr Clin North Am. 2006;53(6):1185–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Clarke SP, Aiken LH. Failure to rescue: needless deaths are prime examples of the need for more nurses at the bedside. Am J Nurs. 2003;103:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, Rich EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: its effect on patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:501–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Arora V, Johnson J. National patient safety goals. A model for building a standardized hand-off protocol. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:646–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sutker WL. The physician’s role in patient safety: What’s in it for me? Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2008;21(1):9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haig K, Sutton S, Whittington J. Sbar: a shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:167–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nelson BA, Massey R. Implementing an electronic change-of-shift report using transforming care at the bedside processes and methods. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(4):162–8. PubMed PMID: 20305461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ryan S, O’Riordan JM, Tierney S, Conlon KC, Ridgway PF. Impact of a new electronic handover system in surgery. Int J Surg. 2011;9(3):217–20. PubMed PMID: 21129508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wayne JD, Tyagi R, Reinhardt G, Rooney D, Makoul G, Chopra S, et al. Simple standardized patient handoff system that increases accuracy and completeness. J Surg Educ. 2008;65(6):476–85. PubMed PMID: 19059181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Beach C, Vozenilik J, Adler M, et al. Transitioning patients from the ed to the hospital: observations of handoff communication. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(5):205–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Campion TR, Jr., Denny JC, Weinberg ST, Lorenzi NM, Waitman LR. Analysis of a computerized sign-out tool: Identification of unanticipated uses and contradictory content. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;99–104. PubMed PMID: 18693806. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2655840.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Rossini AJ, Pellegrini CA. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident work hours. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(4):538–45. PubMed PMID: 15804467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Eaton EG, McDonough K, Lober WB, Johnson EA, Pellegrini CA, Horvath KD. Safety of using a computerized rounding and sign-out system to reduce resident duty hours. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1189–95. PubMed PMID: 20592514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:257–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Landucci D, Gipe BT. The art and science of the handoff: How hospitalists share data. Hospitalist. 1999;3:4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80:1094–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Joint Commission (TJC) Hospital National Patient Safety Goals. 2009. Retrieved from http://www.unchealthcare.org/site/Nursing/servicelines/aircare/additionaldocuments/2009npsg (Last Accessed on September, 26, 2013).

  56. Apker J, Mallak L, Applegate EB, Gibson S, Ham J, Johnson N, et al. Exploring emergency physician-hospitalist handoff interactions: development of the handoff communication assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;55(2):161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Miller A, Scheinkestel C, Limpus A, Joseph M, Karnik A, Venkatesh B. Uni- and interdisciplinary effects on round and handover content in intensive care units. Hum Factors. 2009;51(3):339–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stevens D. Handovers and Debussy. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:2–3. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.025916.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Harvey C, Schuster R, Durso F, Matthews A, Surabattula D. Human factors of transition of care. In: Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lawrence R, Tomolo A, Garlisi A, Aron D. Conceptualizing handover strategies at change of shift in the emergency department: a grounded theory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):256. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Payne B, Hardey H, Coleman P. Interactions between nurses during handovers in elderly care. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:277–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Van Eaton E. Handoff improvement: we need to understand what we are trying to fix. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gillen J, Cameron CA, editors. International perspectives on early childhood research: a day in the life. Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Magder S. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. In: Ericsson A, editor. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic decision-making environments. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1996. p. 127–65.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kannampallil T, Schauer GF, Cohen T, Patel VL. Considering complexity in healthcare systems. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(6):943–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Malhotra S, Jordan MD, Shortliffe EH, Patel VL. Workflow modeling in critical care: piecing together your own puzzle. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(2):81–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Patel VL, Zhang J, Yoskowitz NA, Green R, Sayan OR. Methodological review: translational cognition for decision support in critical care environments: a review. J Biomed Inform. 2008;41(3):413–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Unertl KM, Weinger MB, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM. Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care. JAMA. 2009;16(6):826–36.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Randell R, Wilson S, Woodward P. The importance of the verbal shift handover report: a multi-site case study. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80(11):803–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Collins SA, Stein DM, Vawdrey DK, Stetson PD, Bakken S. Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(4):704–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, Miller RA. Expanding the concept of medical information: an observational study of physicians’ information needs. Comput Biomed Res. 1992;25(2):181–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Patel VL, Cohen T, Murarka T, Olsen J, Kagita S, Myneni S, et al. Recovery at the edge of error: debunking the myth of the infallible expert. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(3):413–24. PubMed PMID: 20869466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Malone TW, Crowston K. The interdisciplinary theory of coordination. ACM Comput Surv. 1994;26(1):87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Woloshynowych M, Davis R, Brown R, Vincent C. Communication patterns in a uk emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(4):407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Abraham J, Nguyen VC, Almoosa KF, Patel B, Patel VL. Falling through the cracks: information breakdowns in critical care handoff communication. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA); 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sanderson PM, Fisher C. Exploratory sequential data analysis: foundations. Hum-Comput Interact. 1994;9(3&4):251–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Frohlich D, Drew P, Monk A. Management of repair in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput Interact. 1994;9(3–4):385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Ritter FE, Larkin JH. Developing process models as summaries of hci action sequences. Hum-Comput Interact. 1994;9(3–4):345–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Zheng K, Guo M, Hanauer DA. Using the time and motion method to study clinical work processes and workflow: methodological inconsistencies and a call for standardized research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(5):704–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Abraham PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abraham, J., Almoosa, K.F. (2014). Falling Through the Cracks: Investigation of Care Continuity in Critical Care Handoffs. In: Patel, V., Kaufman, D., Cohen, T. (eds) Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5490-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics