Skip to main content

Communication and Complexity: Negotiating Transitions in Critical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 1246 Accesses

Abstract

There is considerable truth to the old adage that successful conversation will take you very far. Of course, the proposition is more complex when applied to the healthcare system. Hospital institutions are complex structures that use a multilayered approach and employ multiple modes of communication in caring for patients including paging systems, telephones, e-mail, fax, and face-to-face interactions [1]. It is reasonable to propose that electronic health records constitute another medium of communication although a decidedly less than optimal one at this point in time. However, the patient care process in ICU relies heavily on face-to-face verbal exchange [2]. It has been reported that clinicians devote 50—60 % of clinical time to talk in ICU settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvarez G, Coiera E. Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care. 2006;21(3):236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Munir SK, Kay S. Simplifying the complexity surrounding ICU work processes–identifying the scope for information management in ICU settings. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(7–8):643–56. PubMed PMID: 16023407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. JAMA. 2000;7(3):277–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhasale AL, Miller GC, Reid SE, Britt HC. Analysing potential harm in Australian general practice: an incident-monitoring study. Med J Aust. 1998;169(2):73–6. PubMed PMID: 9700340.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(2):143–51. PubMed PMID: 19032571.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheelan SA, Burchill CN, Tilin F. The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12(6):527–34. PubMed PMID: 14619358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel VL, Kaufman DR, Magder S. The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. In: Ericsson A, editor. The acquisition of medical expertise in complex dynamic decision-making environments. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1996. p. 127–65.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ayse PG, Bradford DW, Priyadarshini RP, Pascale C, Peter JP. Human factors and ergonomics in intensive care units. In: Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press; 2011. p. 693–708.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carayon P, Smith MJ. Work organization and ergonomics. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(6):649–62. PubMed PMID: 11132049.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Durso FT, Drews F. Health care, aviation, and ecosystems: a socio-natural systems perspective. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rouse WB. Health care as a complex adaptive system: implications for design and management. Bridge. 2008;38(1):17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lave J. Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Clancey WJ. Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In: Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 11–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutchins E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. xviii, 381.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Horsky J, Kuperman GJ, Patel VL. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE: a case report. JAMA. 2005;12:377–82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. Perspect Soc Shar Cogn. 1991;13(1991):127–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark HH, Schaefer EF. Contributing to discourse. Cogn Sci. 1989;13(2):259–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kecskes I, Zhang F. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmat Cogn. 2009;17(2):331–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kecskes I. Dueling contexts: a dynamic model of meaning. J Pragmat. 2008;40(3):385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kecskes I. The paradox of communication-socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmat Soc. 2010;1(1):50–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robert LW, Shawna JP, Emily SP. Handoffs and transitions of care. In: Handbook of human factors and ergonomics in health care and patient safety. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (Florida): CRC Press; 2011. p. 163–72.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mistry KP, Jaggers J, Lodge AJ, Alton M, Mericle JM, Frush KS, et al. Using Six Sigma methodology to improve handoff communication in high-risk patients. 2008. 10 July 2011. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/advances2/vol3/Advances-Mistry_114.pdf

  24. Sutcliffe K, Lewton E, Rosenthal M. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79(2/February):186–94. PubMed PMID: doi:10.1097/00001888-200402000-00019

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Kaufman PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaufman, D.R., Abraham, J., Mamykina, L. (2014). Communication and Complexity: Negotiating Transitions in Critical Care. In: Patel, V., Kaufman, D., Cohen, T. (eds) Cognitive Informatics in Health and Biomedicine. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5490-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics