Abstract
Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zahiri CA, et al. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(8):890–5.
Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(4):958–65.
Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9–12.
Bach CM, et al. Correlation between radiographic assessment and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009;16(3):207–10.
Sadoghi P, et al. Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:142.
Bach CM, et al. Reproducible assessment of radiolucent lines in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;434:183–8.
Al-Hadithy N, et al. How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(5):493–501.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caplan, N., Kader, D.F. (2014). A Comparison of Four Models of Total Knee-Replacement Prostheses. In: Banaszkiewicz, P., Kader, D. (eds) Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5450-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5451-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)