Facebook as a Tool for Artistic Collaboration

Part of the Springer Series on Cultural Computing book series (SSCC)


Since its foundation in 2004, Facebook has become a major force in social networking, claiming to give people“…the power to share and make the world more open and connected.” How can these tools be used by artists to connect and share with collaborators? Can Facebook be used to aid creativity, as a collaborative artistic tool or environment? Based on a practical performance-based research project ‘Feedback’, this chapter focuses on the use of Facebook as a tool for creative collaboration and explores a number of possible models of artistic collaboration using the online social network.


Social Networking Site Music Activity Online Research Creative Task Dance Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Facebook. Facebook. Product/Service, Facebook, USA. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
  2. 2.
    Fraser, M., & Dutta, S. (2008). Throwing sheep in the boardroom. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manovich, L. (2008). Art after Web 2.0. In R. Frieling et al. (Ed.), The art of participation: 1950 to now. London: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art/Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keen, A. (2008). The cult of the amateur. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vickery, G., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007). Participative web and user-created content. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexa. Site info: Accessed 21 Jan 2013.
  7. 7.
    Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gartrell, M., Beach, A., Ramanarayanankrishnaniyer, J., Xing, X., Han, R., Lv, Q., Mishra, S., & Seada, K. (2010). Integrating wikipedia and facebook context into collaborative e-brainstorming. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder/Nokia Research Palo Alto. USA. Accessed 21 Jan 2013.
  9. 9.
    Tan, W. K., Nguyen, T. T. D., Tha, K. K. O., & Yu, X. (2009). Designing groupware that fosters social capital creation: Can facebook support global virtual team? In Proceeding Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS 2009), paper 525. Accessed 21 Jan 2013.
  10. 10.
    Farooq, U., Carroll, J. M., & Ganoe, C. G. (2007). Supporting creativity with awareness in distributed collaboration. In Proceeding 2007 international ACM conference on supporting Group Work (GROUP’07) (pp. 31–40). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schleyer, T., Spallek, H., Butler, B. S., Subramanian, S., Weiss, D., Rattanathikun, P., & Mueller, G. (2008). Facebook for scientists: Requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schadewitz, N., & Zamenopoulos, T. (2009). Towards an online design studio: A study of social networking in design distance learning. In International associated of societies of design research conference (IASDR). Seoul, 18–22 October 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shao, Y., Daley, L., & Vaughan, L. (2007). Exploring Web 2.0 for virtual design studio teaching. In Proceeding Australian society for computers in learning in tertiary education conference. Singapore.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Creative Collaboration. Creative collaboration. Facebook, USA. Accessed 24 May 2011.
  15. 15.
    Kiu, R., et al. Creative artists group. Open group, Facebook, USA. Accessed 27 Jan 2013.
  16. 16.
    Plymouth University. Media arts and drama collaboration. Open group, Facebook, USA. Accessed 15 July 2011.
  17. 17.
    Arts Collaboration Lab. Arts collaboration lab at Columbia. Facebook, USA. Accessed 15 July 2011.
  18. 18.
    The Collaboration Project. Collaboration project – Los Angeles. Facebook, USA. Accessed 14 Jan 2013.
  19. 19.
    Hamidi, F., & Baljko, M. (2010). Collaborative poetry on the Facebook social network. In Proceeding 16th ACM international conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’10) (pp. 305–306). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skura, H., Nierle, K., & Gin, G. (2008). Romeo and Juliet: A Facebook tragedy. In A. Liu (Ed.), Literature+: Cross-disciplinary models of literary interpretation. PBWorks. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
  21. 21.
    Coleman, D., & Levine, S. (2008). Collaboration 2.0. In Happy about, silicon valley (p. 27). Cupertino: Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson, C. (2007, September 5). Brave new world of digital intimacy. The New York Times. Accessed 21 Jan 2013.
  23. 23.
    Bennett, R., & Dziekan, V. (2005). The omnium project: Forming online communities of students, educators and professionals to explore collaborative modes of creative interaction and practice. In Proceeding 8th international electronic theses and dissertations symposium (ETD2005). Sydney.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dennis, A., & Williams, M. (2003). Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research and future directions. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (p. 160). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bennett, R., & Polaine, A. (2006). Online collaboration and creative processes. In Enhancing curricula: 3rd international conference. Lisbon: Centre for Learning and Teaching in Art and Design.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kvan, T. (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silverstone, R. (1999). What’s new about new media? New Media and Society, 1(1), 10–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Creative TechnologiesDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations