Skip to main content

Long-Term ECG (Holter) Monitoring and Head-Up Tilt Test

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cardiac Arrhythmias
  • 3439 Accesses

Abstract

Long term electrocardiogram monitoring is a very useful investigation to diagnose, assess prognosis and assess response to drug therapy in cardiac arrhythmic and ischemic disorders. Commonly it is used for the diagnosis of undiagnosed palpitation or syncope. Holter monitoring is used over one or two days where as event recorder and external loop recorder can be used for several days to weeks. Implantable loop recorder has the highest diagnostic value and can be used for several years to pick up very rare episodes.

Head up tilt test is commonly performed to diagnose vasovagal syncope in clinically indicated cases of undiagnosed syncope. To increase diagnostic yield and reduce procedure time, various pharmacological provocations have been introduced. The commonest positive response is type-1, where the syncope is associated with a fall in blood pressure and heart rate but not leading to asystole for more than 3 seconds. The risk of procedure is low, but in rare instances there can be prolonged period of asystole requiring cardiac resuscitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Crawford MH, Bernstein SJ, Deedwania PC, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography – Executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Circulation. 1999;100:886–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kadish AH, Buxton AE, Kennedy HL, et al. ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiogram: a report of the ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM Task Force on Clinical Competence (ACC/AHA committee to develop a clinical competence statement on electrocardiogram and ambulatory electrocardiogram), endorsed by the international society for Holter and noninvasive electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:2091–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy HL. Use of long-term (Holter) electrocardiogram recordings. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1999. p. 716–29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schert D, Dala D, Henrickson CA, et al. Prospective comparison of the diagnostic utility of a standard event monitor versus a ‘leadless’ portable electrocardiogram monitor in the evaluation of patient with palpitations. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;22:39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaleschke G, Hoffman B, Drewitz J, et al. Prospective multicenter validation of a simple, patient operated electrocardiograph system for the detection of arrhythmias and electrocardiogram changes. Europace. 2009;11:1362–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Olson JA, Fouts AM, Padelinam BJ, et al. Utility of mobile outpatient telemetry for the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, syncope and assessment of therapy efficacy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:473–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rotham SA, Laughlin JC, Seltzer J, et al. The diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias: a prospective multi-center randomized study comprising mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry versus standard loop event monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:248–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Marco JP, Philbrick JT. Use of ambulatory electrocardiogram (Holter) monitoring. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Josephson ME, et al. Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations. Ann Intern Med. 1998;28:890–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi AK, Kowey PF, Prystowsky EN. First experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MOCT) system for the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:878–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Yee R, et al. Randomized assessment of syncope trial: conventional diagnostic testing versus a prolonged monitoring strategy. Circulation. 2001;104:46–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giada F, Gulizia M, Francese M, et al. Recurrent unexplained palpitations (RUP) study: comparison of implantable loop recorders versus conventional diagnostic strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1951–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Investigator TC. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial on arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:406–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall J, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Eng J Med. 2002;346:877–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brady GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Eng J Med. 2005;352:225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein AE, Di Marco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2202 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and antiarrhythmic devices): developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic surgeons. Circulation. 2008;117:e350–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein PK. Assessing heart rate variability from real world Holter reports. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2002;6:239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pepine CJ, Sharef B, Andrews TC, et al. Relation between clinical, angiographic and ischemic findings at baseline and ischemia related adverse outcomes at 1 year in the asymptomatic cardiac ischemia pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1483–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doval HC, Nul DR, Grancelli HO, et al., for the GESICA-GEMA Investigators. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in severe heart failure. Circulation. 1996;94:3198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cairns JA, Connolly SJ, Roberts R, et al. Randomized trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular depolarization: CAMIAT. Lancet. 1997;349:675–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Fisher JD, et al. A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;341:1882–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kenny RA, Ingram A, Bayliss J, et al. Head up tilt: a useful test for investigating unexplained syncope. Lancet. 1986;1:1352–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grubb BP, Karas B. Clinical disorders of autonomic nervous system associated with orthostatic intolerance: an overview of classification, clinical evaluation and management. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22:798.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. The Consensus Committee on American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 1996;46:1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldstein DS, Holmes C, Frank SM, et al. Sympathoadrenal imbalance before neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith AA, Hallisill JR, Low PA, et al. Pathophysiological basis of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure. J Physiol. 1999;519:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fitzpatrick AP, Theodorakis G, Vardas P, et al. Methodology of head up tilt test testing in patients with unexplained syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:125–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Almquist A, Goldenberg IF, Milstein S, et al. Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright posture in patients with unexplained syncope. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Natale A, Akhtar M, Jazayeri M, et al. Provocation of hypotension during head-up tilt testing in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope. Circulation. 1995;92:54–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Waxman MB, Yao L, Cameron DA, et al. Isoproterenol introduction of vasopressor type reaction in vasopressor prone persons. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:58–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morilli CA, Klein GJ, Zandri S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a low dose isoproterenol head-up test protocol. Am Heart J. 1995;129:901–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Raviele A, Menozzi C, Brignoli M, et al. Value of head up tilt test potentiated by sublingual nitroglycerine to assess the origin of unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oraii S, Maleki M, Minooii M, et al. Comparing two different protocols for tilt table testing: sublingual glyceryl trinitrate versus isoprenaline infusion. Heart. 1999;81:603–5.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Del Rosso A, Bartoli P, Bartoletti A, et al. Shortened head up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerine in patients with unexplained syncope. Am Heart J. 1998;135:564–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Del Rosso A, Bartoletti A, Bartoli P, et al. Methodology of head up tilt test potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerine in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:1007–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benditt DG, Ermis C, Fei L. Head up tilt testing. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p. 812–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santosh Kumar Dora MD, DM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dora, S.K. (2014). Long-Term ECG (Holter) Monitoring and Head-Up Tilt Test. In: Kibos, A., Knight, B., Essebag, V., Fishberger, S., Slevin, M., Țintoiu, I. (eds) Cardiac Arrhythmias. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5316-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5316-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5315-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5316-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics