Abstract
We review mathematical and algorithmic problems of reconstructing evolutionary features at ancestors in a known phylogeny. In particular, we revisit a generic framework for the problem that was introduced by Sankoff and Rousseau (Math. Program. 9:240–246, 1975).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agnarsson, I., Miller, J.A.: Is ACCTRAN better than DELTRAN? Cladistics 24, 1–7 (2008)
Ames, R.M., Money, D., Ghatge, V.P., Whelan, S., Lovell, S.C.: Determining the evolutionary history of gene families. Bioinformatics 28(1), 48–55 (2012)
Bérard, S., Gallien, C., Boussau, B., Szöllősi, G.J., Daubin, V., Tannier, E.: Evolution of gene neighborhoods within reconciled phylogenies. Bioinformatics 28, i382–i388 (2012)
Blanchette, M., Green, E.D., Miller, W., Haussler, D.: Reconstructing large regions of an ancestral mammalian genome in silico. Genome Res. 12, 2412–2423 (2004)
Blanchette, M., Schwikowski, B., Tompa, M.: Algorithms for phylogenetic footprinting. J. Comput. Biol. 9(2), 211–223 (2002)
Caetano-Anollés, G.: Evolution of genome size in the grasses. Crop Sci. 45, 1809–1816 (2005)
Camin, J.H., Sokal, R.R.: A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19, 311–326 (1965)
Capra, J.A., Williams, A.G., Pollard, K.S.: Proteinhistorian: tools for the comparative analysis of eukaryote protein origin. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8(6), e1002567 (2011)
Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Edwards, A.W.H.: Phylogenetic analysis models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19(3), 233–267 (1967)
Clemente, J.C., Ikeo, K., Valiente, G., Gojobori, T.: Optimized ancestral state reconstruction using Sankoff parsimony. BMC Bioinform. 10, 51 (2009)
Csűrös, M.: Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics 26(15), 1910–1912 (2010)
Csűrös, M.: Ancestral reconstruction by asymmetric Wagner parsimony over continuous characters and squared parsimony over distributions. In: Proc. Sixth RECOMB Comparative Genomics Satellite Workshop. Springer Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, vol. 5267, pp. 72–86 (2008)
Darwin, C.: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London (1859)
Day, W.H.E.: Computationally difficult parsimony problems in phylogenetic systematics. J. Theor. Biol. 103, 429–438 (1983)
Day, W.H.E., Johnson, D.S., Sankoff, D.: The computational complexity of inferring rooted phylogenies by parsimony. Math. Biosci. 81, 33–42 (1986)
Day, W.H.E., Sankoff, D.: Computational complexity of inferring phylogenies by compatibility. Syst. Zool. 35, 224–229 (1986)
Edwards, A.W.F., Cavalli-Sforza, L.L.: Reconstructing evolutionary trees. In: Heywood, V.H., McNeill, J. (eds.) Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification, vol. 6, pp. 67–76. Systematics Association, London (1963)
Elias, I.: Settling the intractability of multiple alignment. J. Comput. Biol. 13(7), 1323–1339 (2006)
Farris, J.S.: Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19(1), 83–92 (1970)
Farris, J.S.: Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo’s law. Syst. Zool. 26(1), 77–88 (1977)
Feijão, P., Meidanis, J.: SCJ: a breakpoint-like distance that simplifies several rearrangement problems. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 8(5), 1318–1329 (2011)
Felsenstein, J.: Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22(3), 240–249 (1973)
Felsenstein, J.: Parsomony in systematics: biological and statistical issues. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14, 313–333 (1983)
Fitch, W.M.: Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum changes for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20, 406–416 (1971)
Fitch, W.M., Farris, J.S.: Evolutionary trees with minimum nucleotide replacements from amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 3(4), 263–278 (1974)
Gelfman, S., Burstein, D., Penn, O., Savchenko, A., Amit, M., Schwartz, S., Pupko, T., Ast, G.: Changes in exon–intron structure during vertebrate evolution affect the splicing pattern of exons. Genome Res. 22(1), 35–50 (2012)
Han, M.V., Hahn, M.W.: Inferring the history of interchromosomal gene transposition in Drosophila using n-dimensional parsimony. Genetics 190, 813–825 (2012)
Hartigan, J.: Minimum mutation fits to a given tree. Biometrics 29, 53–65 (1973)
Hwang, F.K., Richards, D.S.: Steiner tree problems. Networks 22, 55–89 (1992)
Kannan, L., Wheeler, W.C.: Maximum parsimony on phylogenetic networks. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 7, 9 (2012)
Kasap, S., Benkrid, K.: High performance phylogenetic analysis with maximum parsimony on reconfigurable hardware. IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst. 19(5) (2011)
Kluge, A.R., Farris, J.S.: Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18, 1–32 (1969)
Koonin, E.V.: Comparative genomics, minimal gene sets and the last universal common ancestor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 127–136 (2003)
Le Quesne, W.J.: The uniquely evolved character concept and its cladistic application. Syst. Zool. 23, 513–517 (1974)
Maddison, W.P.: Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuous-valued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Syst. Zool. 40(3), 304–314 (1991)
Makarova, K.S., Sorokin, A.V., Novichkov, P.S., Wolf, Y.I., Koonin, E.V.: Clusters of orthologous genes for 41 archaeal genomes and implications for evolutionary genomics of archaea. Biol. Direct 2, 33 (2007)
Mirkin, B.G., Fenner, T.I., Galperin, M.Y., Koonin, E.V.: Algorithms for computing evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol. 3, 2 (2003)
Moret, B.M.E., Lin, Y., Tang, J.: Rearrangements in phylogenetic inference: compare or encode? In: Chauve, C. et al. (eds.) Models and Algorithms for Genome Evolution. Computational Biology, vol. 19. Springer, Berlin (2014). In this volume
Narushima, H., Misheva, N.: On characteristics of ancestral-state reconstructions under the accelerated transformation optimization. Discrete Appl. Math. 122, 195–209 (2002)
Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.B.: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443–453 (1970)
Pauling, L., Zuckerkandl, E.: Chemical paleogenetics: molecular “restoration studies” of extinct forms of life. Acta Chem. Scand. 17, 9–16 (1963)
Rogers, J.S.: Deriving phylogenetic trees from allele frequencies. Syst. Zool., 52–63 (1984)
Sankoff, D.: Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 28(1) (1975)
Sankoff, D.: The early introduction of dynamic programming into computational biology. Bioinformatics 16(1), 41–47 (2000)
Sankoff, D., Leduc, G., Antoine, N., Paquin, B., Lang, B.F., Cedergren, R.: Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: evolution of the mitochondrial genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 6575–6579 (1992)
Sankoff, D., Morel, C., Cedergren, R.J.: Evolution of 5S RNA and the non-randomness of base replacement. Nat., New Biol. 245, 232–234 (1973)
Sankoff, D., Rousseau, P.: Locating the vertices of a Steiner tree in arbitrary metric space. Math. Program. 9, 240–246 (1975)
Schwartz, S., Silva, J., Burstein, D., Pupko, T., Eyras, E., Ast, G.: Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 18, 88–103 (2008)
Swofford, D.L., Maddison, W.P.: Reconstructing ancestral states using Wagner parsimony. Math. Biosci. 87, 199–229 (1987)
Tang, J., Wang, L.-S.: Improving genome rearrangement phylogeny using sequence-style parsimony. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Fifth Symposium on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE’05), pp. 137–144 (2005)
Witmer, P.D., Doheny, K.F., Adams, M.K., Boehm, C.D., Dizon, J.S., Goldstein, J.L., Templeton, T.M., Wheaton, A.M., Dong, P.N., Pugh, E.W., Nussbaum, R.L., Hunter, K., Kelmenson, J.A., Rowe, L.B., Brownstein, M.J.: The development of a highly informative mouse simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) marker set and construction of a mouse family tree using parsimony analysis. Genome Res. 13, 485–491 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Csűrös, M. (2013). How to Infer Ancestral Genome Features by Parsimony: Dynamic Programming over an Evolutionary Tree. In: Chauve, C., El-Mabrouk, N., Tannier, E. (eds) Models and Algorithms for Genome Evolution. Computational Biology, vol 19. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5298-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5298-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5297-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5298-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)