Skip to main content

Procurement Network Formation: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1747 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

Abstract

In this chapter, we model the multiple unit single item procurement network formation problem as a surplus maximizing network flow cooperative game. Here, each edge is owned by a rational utility maximizing agent. Also, each agent has a capacity constraint on the number of units that he can process. That is, each edge can be assumed to have a capacity constraint on the flow that it can admit. The buyer has a demand for a certain number of units. The agents in the network must coordinate themselves to meet this demand. The buyer also has a specified valuation per unit of the item. The surplus which is the difference between the value generated and the minimum cost flow in the network, is to be divided among the agents that help provide the flow. We first investigate the conditions under which the core of this game is non-empty. We then construct an extensive-form game to implement the core whenever it is non-empty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aumann RJ (1987) Game theory. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds) The new palgrave, a dictionary of economics. Macmillan, London, pp 460–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Babaioff M, Nisan N (2004) Concurrent auctions across the supply chain. J Artif Intell Res 21:595–629

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Babaioff M, Walsh WE (2005) Incentive-compatible, budget-balanced, yet highly efficient auctions for supply chain formation. Decis Support Syst 39:123–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajari PL, McMillan RS, Tadelis S (2003) Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: an empirical analysis. Technical report, NBER Working paper series, Department of Economics, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Narahari Y (2004) Object oriented modeling for decision support in supply chain networks. Eur J Oper Res 153:704–726

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bondereva ON (1963) Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. Problemy Kibernetiki 10:119–139 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cachon P, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in supply chain analysis. In: Simchi Levi D, Wu DS, Shen ZJ (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis, modelling in the e-business era. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J, Gini M (2001) A testbed for multi-agent contracting for supply chain formation. In: IJCAI-2001 workshop on artificial intelligence and manufacturing

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins J (2002) Solving combinatorial auctions with temporal constraints in economic agents. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Erenguc SS, Simpson NC, Vakharia AJ (1999) Integrated production/distribution planning in supply chains: an invited review. Eur J Oper Res 115:219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan M, Stallert J, Whinston AB (2003) Decentralized mechanism design for supply chain organizations using an auction market. Inf Syst Res 14(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg D, Narahari Y, Viswanadham N (2004) Design of six sigma supply chains. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 1(1):38–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg D (2006) Design of innovative mechanisms for contemporary game theoretic problems in eletronic commerce. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Automation, Indian Institute of Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiong S, Sadeh N (2004) Coordinating multi-attribute procurement auctions subject to finite capacity considerations. Technical report, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Unviversity, CMU-ISRI-03-105 Tech. Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng M, Parlar M (2005) Game theoretic applications in supply chain management: a review. Inf Syst Oper Res 43(3):187–220

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Collel A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin E (1985) The theory of implementation in Nash equilibrium: a survey. In: Hurwicz L, Schmiedler D, Sonnenschien H (eds) Social goods and social organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R (1992) A dominant strategy double auction. J Econ Theor 56:434–450

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J (1992) Implementation, contracts and renegotiation in environments with complete information. In: Laffont JJ (ed) Advances in economic theory. VI world congress of the econometric society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1991) Game theory: analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan M, Sosic G (2008) Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: review and extensions. Eur J Oper Res 187(3):719–745

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano R, Vohra R (1997) Non-cooperative implementation of the core. Soc Choice Welf 14:513–525

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley LS (1967) On balanced sets and cores. Nav Res Logist Q 14:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (2005) Divide-and-permute. Games Econ behav 52:186–200

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanadham N, Goankar RS (2003) Partner selection and synchronized planning in dynamic manufacturing networks. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(1):117–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh WE, Wellman MP (1999) Efficiency and equilibrium in task allocation economies with hierarchical dependencies. In: Sixteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 520–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh WE, Wellman MP, Ygge F (2000) Combinatorial auctions for supply chain formation. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC-00), pp 260–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh WE, Wellman MP (2003) Decentralized supply chain formation: a market protocol and competitive equilibrium analysis. J Artif Intell 19:513–567

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D (2004) Supply chain intermediation: A bargaining theoretic framework. In: Simchi Levi D, Wu DS, Shen ZJ (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis, modelling in the e-business era. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Narahari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chandrashekar, T.S., Narahari, Y. (2014). Procurement Network Formation: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach. In: Benyoucef, L., Hennet, JC., Tiwari, M. (eds) Applications of Multi-Criteria and Game Theory Approaches. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5295-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5295-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5294-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5295-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics