Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis

  • Francis L. Shannon
  • Marc P. Sakwa
  • Robert L. Johnson

Abstract

The time-tested management of patients with severe aortic stenosis has been surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR). The advances in AVR have progressed over the last 60 years with developments in the heart lung machine, type of valve prosthesis, minimally invasive approaches, and transcatheter techniques. There are currently over 80 types of prosthetic valves available for use. This chapter will provide an overview of the various surgical approaches for AVR as well as the types of aortic valve prosthesis.

Keywords

Surgical management of aortic valve stenosis Aortic valve replacement (AVR) Surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) Aortic valve prosthesis Mechanical aortic valve replacement Auto-graft aortic valve replacement 

References

  1. 1.
    Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP, Rabil PJ, McDermott F. Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency. Surgery. 1954;35:673–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vlahakes GJ. Mechanical heart valves: the test of time. Circulation. 2007;116:1759–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edmunds Jr LH. Evolution of prosthetic heart valves. Am Heart J. 2001;141:849–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apparatus for draining blood from a surgical wound and transmission to a heart-lung machine US 3799702 A.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lower RR, Stofer RC, Shumway NE. Autotransplantation of the pulmonic valve into the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1960;39(5):680–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pillsbury RC, Shumway NE. Replacement of the aortic valve with the autologous pulmonic valve. Surg Forum. 1966;17:176–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet. 1967;2(7523):956–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mokhles MM, Körtke H, Stierle U, Wagner O, Charitos EI, Bogers AJJC, Gummert J, Sievers HH, Takkenberg JJM. Survival comparison of the ross procedure and mechanical valve replacement with optimal self-management anticoagulation therapy. Propensity-matched cohort study. Circulation. 2011;123:31–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119:1034–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobayashi J. Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:345–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiang YP, Chikwe J, Moskowitz AJ, Itagaki S, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA. 2014;312(13):1323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunning J, Graham RJ, Thambyrajah J, et al. Stentless vs stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2369–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luciani GB, Auriemma S, Santini F, et al. Comparison of late outcome after stentless versus stented xenograft aortic valve replacement. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13(Suppl I):I136–42.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamin M, Bove T, Van Belleghem Y, et al. Stentless vs stented aortic valve replacement: left ventricular mass regression. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005;13:112–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, et al. Stentless aortic valve are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2180–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bové T, Bellenghem YV, François K, et al. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcomes. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2006;30:706–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, et al. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:767–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, et al. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:73–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gulbins H, Florath I, Ennker J. Cerebrovascular events after stentless aortic valve replacement during a 9-year follow-up period. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;86:769–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Schaff HV, Edwards WD. Aortic valve decalcification: history repeated with a new result. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:689–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves: description of a new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:704–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, Borenstein N, Tron C, Bauer F, Derumeaux G, Anselme F, Laborde F, Leon MB. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106:3006–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnston DR, Atik FA, Rajeswaran J, et al. Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery. JTCVS. 2012;144(4):852–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. JTCVS. 2012;145(5):1222–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miceli A, Murzi M, Gilmanov D, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using right minithoracotomy is associated with better outcomes than ministernotomy. JTCVS. 2014;148(1):133–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Schaff HV. Robot-assisted aortic valve replacement using a novel sutureless bovine pericardial prosthesis: proof of concept as an alternative to percutaneous implantation. Innovations (Phila). 2010;5(6):419–23.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Folliguet TA, Vanhuyse F, Konstantinos Z, Laborde F. Early experience with robotic aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(1):172–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gilmanov D, Miceli A, Ferrarini M, et al. Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(5):1585–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rubino AS, Santarpino G, De Praetere H, et al. Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: results of a multicenter study. JTCVS. 2014;148(3):865–71.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Guyton RRA, O’Gara PT, Ruiz CE, Skubas NJ, Sorajja P, Sundt TM, Thomas JM. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis L. Shannon
    • 1
  • Marc P. Sakwa
    • 1
  • Robert L. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryBeaumont Health, Oakland University School of MedicineRoyal OakUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cardiovascular SurgeryBeaumont HealthRoyal OakUSA

Personalised recommendations