Abstract
In this Chapter, we will apply each metric introduced in Chap. 4 to a series of rendered case study spaces to test their success in quantifying and comparing spatial contrast, annual spatial contrast, and annual luminance variability. Although a total of fifteen categories were established in the typological matrix introduced in Chap. 3, we have selected ten case study spaces that represent an overall gradient of contrast and variability. From these ten case study spaces, we have selected four examples to represent a cross-section of results in more detail, while the full spectrum of results for all ten case studies is presented more broadly toward the end of the Chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
http://www.diva-for-rhino.com. (2009). Retrieved from DIVA-for-Rhino.
http://www.rhino3d.com. (2007). Retrieved 2010, from Rhinoceros.
Kleindienst, S., Bodart, M., & Andersen, M. (2008). Graphical representation of climate based daylight performance to support architectural design. LEUKOS, 5(1), 39–61.
Ward, G. (1994). The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. In Proceedings of ‘94 SIGGRAPH Conference, (pp. 459–472).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rockcastle, S., Andersen, M. (2013). Application of New Metrics to Abstract Spatial Models. In: Annual Dynamics of Daylight Variability and Contrast. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5233-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5233-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5232-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5233-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)