Advertisement

Use of Risk Indicators for Major Hazard Risk

  • Jan-Erik VinnemEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

This chapter starts with a general discussion on the indicators of major hazard risk, followed by a discussion of the Risk Level project by PSA in Norway and the lessons learned from this project with respect to major hazard risk indicators. The final part discusses how major hazard risk indicators should be used by individual companies and installations, in order to control major hazard risk.

Keywords

Risk Level Safety Culture Risk Indicator Occupational Accident Major Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ale B (2009) More thinking about process safety indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):470–471Google Scholar
  2. Austnes-Underhaug R et al (2011) Learning from incidents in Statoil (in Norwegian only), IRIS report 2011/156. http://www.statoil.com. Accessed 21 Sep 2011
  3. Aven T (2003) Foundations of risk analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Aven T, Vinnem JE (2007) Risk management, with applications from the offshore oil and gas industry. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker J (2007) The report of the BP U.S. refineries independent safety review panel, ‘Baker report’, January 2007Google Scholar
  6. Elf Petroleum Norway (1998) Health, safety and environment. Annual report for 1997, StavangerGoogle Scholar
  7. Hale A (2009) Why safety performance indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):479–480Google Scholar
  8. Heide B (2009) Monitoring major hazard risk for industrial sectors. Ph.D. thesis, University of StavangerGoogle Scholar
  9. Høivik D, Moen BE, Mearns K, Haukelid K (2009) An explorative study of health, safety and environment culture in a Norwegian petroleum company. Saf Sci 47(7):992–1001Google Scholar
  10. HSE (1995) Prevention of fire and explosion, and emergency response regulations. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. HSE (1996) The offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Huber et al (2008) Learning from organisational incidents: resilience engineering for high-risk process environments. Process Saf Prog 28(1):90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kjellén U (2000) Prevention of accidents through experience feedback. Taylor & Francis, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kjellén U (2009) The safety measurement problem revisited. Saf Sci 47(2009):486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kvitrud A, Ersdal G, Leonardsen RL (2001) On the risk of structural failure on Norwegian offshore installations. In: Proceedings of the 11th international offshore and polar engineering conference on ISOPE 2001. Stavanger, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  16. NPD (1992) Regulations relating to explosion and fire protection of installations in the petroleum activities, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, StavangerGoogle Scholar
  17. Øien K (2001) A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74(2):147–167Google Scholar
  18. Øien K, Sklet S (1999) Risk control during operation of offshore petroleum installations. In: Proceedings of the ESREL = 99, Munich, Balkema, pp 1297–1302Google Scholar
  19. Øien K, Sklet S, Nielsen L (1997) Risk level indicators for surveillance of changes in risk level. In: Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Lisboa, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  20. PSA (2011) Guidelines to regulations relating to material and information in the petroleum activities (the information duty regulations), Petroleum Safety Authority, 1 Feb 2011Google Scholar
  21. Rockwell TH (1959) Safety performance measurement. J Ind Eng 10:12–16Google Scholar
  22. Rosness R, Guttormsen G, Steiro T, Tinmannsvik RK, Herrera IA (2004) Organisational accidents and resilient organisations: five perspectives. SINTEF report STF38 A 04403Google Scholar
  23. Sklet S (2006) Safety barriers; definition, classification, and performance. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:494–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Syvertsen R (2006) Weight of importance for barriers in the offshore oil and gas industry. MSc thesis, University of StavangerGoogle Scholar
  25. Tharaldsen JE, Olsen E, Rundmo T (2008) A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. Saf Sci 46(3):427–439Google Scholar
  26. Thomassen O, Sørum M (2002) Mapping and monitoring the safety level SPE 73923. Paper presented at SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Kuala Lumpur, 20–22 March 2002Google Scholar
  27. Vinnem JE (1997) On the sensitivity of offshore QRA studies. In: Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, Lisboa, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  28. Vinnem JE (2000) Risk monitoring for major hazards. SPE paper 61283, presented at the SPE international conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production, Stavanger, 26–28 June 2000Google Scholar
  29. Vinnem JE (2008) On causes and dependencies of errors in human and organizational barriers against major accidents. Paper presented at ESREL2008, Valencia, 22–25 Sept 2008Google Scholar
  30. Vinnem JE, Aven T, Sørum M, Øien K (2003) Structured approach to risk indicators for major hazards. Paper presented at the ESREL 2003 conference, Maastrict, 16–18 June 2003Google Scholar
  31. Vinnem JE et al (2006) Major hazard risk indicator for monitoring of trends in the Norwegian offshore petroleum sector. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(7):778–791Google Scholar
  32. Vinnem JE et al (2007) Operational safety condition—concept development. Paper presented at ESREL 2007, Stavanger, 25–27 June 2007Google Scholar
  33. Vinnem JE, Hestad JA, Kvaløy JT, Skogdalen JE (2010) Analysis of root causes of major hazard precursors in the offshore petroleum industry. Biometrika 97:375–388Google Scholar
  34. Zwetsloot GIJM (2009) Prospects and limitations of process safety performance indicators. Saf Sci 47(4):495–497Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations