Advertisement

Evaluation of Personnel Risk Levels

  • Jan-Erik VinnemEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

This chapter provides an insight into current fatality risk levels for personnel, as a background for the evaluation of risk results, including the formulation of risk tolerance (or acceptance) criteria for personnel risk. An overview is presented of the components of fatality risk levels for personnel, and possible fatalities in the future are predicted. There has been extensive debate about evacuation means (i.e. lifeboats) in the Norwegian sector for some years. It is therefore essential to form an opinion about the frequency of major accidents and the need for evacuation by seaborne resources. Finally, the chapter considers how risk tolerance criteria for personnel may be expressed.

Keywords

Risk Level Risk Tolerance Mobile Unit Fatal Accident Occupational Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aven T, Vinnem JE (2007) Risk management, with applications from the offshore petroleum industry. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamsen EB, Aven T (2012) Why risk acceptance criteria need to be defined by the authorities and not the industry? Reliab Eng Syst Saf 105:47–50Google Scholar
  3. HSE (2005) Safety case regulations, health and safety executive. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. HSE (2012) Offshore safety statistics bulletin 2011/12. http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/statistics/stat1112.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2012)
  5. Lord Cullen (The Hon) (1990) The public inquiry into the piper alpha disaster. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Standard Norway (2010) Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, Z–013. Standard Norway, OsloGoogle Scholar
  7. Norwegian Oil and Gas (2007) Recommended method for environmental risk analysis—MIRA (in Norwegian only). Norwegian Oil and Gas, StavangerGoogle Scholar
  8. OGP (2012) Safety performance indicators—2011 data. Report no. 2011sGoogle Scholar
  9. PSA (2005) Investigation of gas blowout on Snorre A, Well 34/7-P31A 28.11.2004 (in Norwegian only), Petroleum Safety Authority [Norway], undatedGoogle Scholar
  10. PSA (2011a) The management regulations; Petroleum Safety Authority, Norwegian Pollution Control Authority and the Norwegian Social and Health Directorate; StavangerGoogle Scholar
  11. PSA (2011b) Investigation—gas leak on Gullfaks B 4.12.2010. www.psa.no. Accessed 24 March 2011
  12. PSA (2012) Trends in risk level in the petroleum activity. RNNP 2011 report (Summary report in English, other reports only in Norwegian)Google Scholar
  13. Vinnem JE (1997) Environmental risk analysis of near–shore wildcat well, approach to rational risk acceptance criteria, SPE/UKOOA. In: SPE/UKOOA European environmental conference, 15–16 April 1997, Aberdeen, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  14. Vinnem JE (1998) Blast load frequency distribution, assessment of historical frequencies in the North Sea. Preventor, Bryne, Norway; Report No. 19816–04Google Scholar
  15. Vinnem JE, Vinnem JE (1998) Risk levels on the Norwegian continental shelf. Preventor, Bryne, Norway, Aug 1998 Report No. 19708–03Google Scholar
  16. WOAD (1994) WOAD database, dated 24.3.1998. DNV, Høvik, OsloGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations