Advertisement

A System for Model-Based Quality Assessment of Burn-Protective Garments

  • Ðani Juričić
  • Matej Gašperin
  • Bojan Musizza
  • Gregor Dolanc
  • Igor Mekjavić
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

Fire protective garments are essential for a broad range of professionals, such as fire fighters, soldiers, and workers in process industries. An important step prior to the utilisation of a new garment is to assess its thermal protective characteristics by exposing it to real fire conditions. In this chapter we describe a professional system built around a mannequin equipped with a distributed array of thermocouples. After dressing the mannequin and exposing it to a flash fire the distribution of temperatures on the mannequin surface is recorded. From the temperature recording the heat flux that envelopes the mannequin surface is reconstructed first. To evaluate the possible reaction of skin subjected to the same flux, the skin heat transfer equation has to be solved next. The result of the experiment is a time distribution of injuries across the mannequin. In this chapter we extend the classic assessment procedure by questioning what the distribution of injuries would be if a broad range of individuals with different skin properties were subjected to the same flame conditions. A numerically efficient Monte Carlo simulation procedure which splits the overall computational load into off-line and on-line parts is proposed. The feasibility of the concept is demonstrated on an experimental run.

Keywords

Heat Flux Impulse Response Skin Layer Flame Condition Blood Perfusion Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support of the Slovenian Research Agency through Programme P2-0001 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM (1999) Standard test method for evaluation of flame resistant clothing protection against flash fire simulations using an instrumented manikin. The annual book of ASTM standards Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman HF, Cravalho EG, Woods M (1975) Theory, measurement, and application of thermal properties of biomaterials. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 4(1):43–80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Camenzind MA, Dale DJ, Rossi RM (2007) Manikin test for flame engulfment evaluation of protective clothing: historical review and development of a new ISO standard. Fire Mater 31(5):285–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Crown EM, Dale JD (1992) Evaluation of flash fire protective clothing using an instrumented mannequin. Technical report, University of Alberta, Canada Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gašperin M, Juričić D (2009) The uncertainty in burn prediction as a result of variable skin parameters: an experimental evaluation of burn-protective outfits. Burns 35(7):970–982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gašperin M, Juričić D, Musizza B, Mekjavić I (2008) A model-based approach to the evaluation of flame-protective garments. ISA Trans 47(2):198–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gowrishankar TR, Stewart DA, Martin GT, Weaver JC (2004) Transport lattice models of heat transport in skin with spatially heterogeneous, temperature-dependent perfusion. Biomed Eng Online 3(1):42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halin J, Mulligan J, Hamouda H, Barker R, Soroka A (1996) A sensitivity study of a variable-property skin burn model considering the variability of water content. ASTM Spec Tech Publ 1237:592–606 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heath MT (2002) Scientific computing: an introductory survey. McGraw-Hill, New York Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henriques FC (1947) Studies of thermal injury; the predictability and the significance of thermally induced rate processes leading to irreversible epidermal injury. Arch Pathol 43:489–502 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO (2004) Protective clothing against heat and flame—test method for complete garments—prediction of burn injuries using an instrumented manikin. Technical report, ISO/TC 94 ISO/DIS13506 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang SC, Ma N, Li HJ, Zhang XX (2002) Effects of thermal properties and geometrical dimensions on skin burn injuries. Burns 28(8):713–717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehta AK, Wong F (1972) Measurement of flammability and burn potential of fabrics. Technical report, COM-73-10950 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meneses P, Crane JM, Ennis WJ (1998) A 31p nmr study of extracted phospholipid composition of human skin: full thickness skin, dermis, epidermis and granulation tissue. Skin Res Technol 4(2):71–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moore TL, Lunt M, McManus B, Anderson ME, Herrick AL (2003) Seventeen-point dermal ultrasound scoring systema reliable measure of skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 42(12):1559–1563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morse H, Tickner G, Brown G (1976) Burn damage and burn depth criteria. Technical report, Aerotherm report TN-75-26 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pennes HH (1998) Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol 85(1):5–34 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song G (2005) Effects of simulated flash fire and variations in skin model on mannikin fire test. J ASTM Int. doi: 10.1520/JAI12116 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Southwood WFW (1955) The thickness of the skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 15:423–429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stoll AM, Green LC (1959) Relationship between pain and tissue damage due to thermal radiation. J Appl Physiol 14(3):373–382 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takata AN, Rouse J, Stanley T (1973) Thermal analysis program. Technical report, IIT Research Institute report, IITRI-J6286 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torvi DA (2005) Effects of thermal properties on skin burn predictions in longer duration protective clothing tests. J ASTM Int. doi: 10.1520/JAI12115 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torvi DA, Dale JD (1994) A finite element model of skin subjected to a flash fire. J Biomech Eng 116(3):250–255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whitton JT, Everall JD (1973) The thickness of the epidermis. Br J Dermatol 89(5):467–476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wilson SB, Spence VA (1988) A tissue heat transfer model for relating dynamic skin temperature changes to physiological parameters. Phys Med Biol 33(8):895–912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ðani Juričić
    • 1
  • Matej Gašperin
    • 1
  • Bojan Musizza
    • 1
  • Gregor Dolanc
    • 1
  • Igor Mekjavić
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Systems and ControlJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Department of Automation, Biocybernetics and RoboticsJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations