Skip to main content

The Front Suspension

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1841 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors introduce the telehydraulic fork, which has become, across the years, the most common kind of front suspension for motorbikes. In chronological order, some noteworthy patents are presented, which help the reader following the main steps of the technical evolution which gave front motorbike suspensions their current shape. Then, the behaviour of some key structural elements of the fork is examined, under the assumption that the fork is subject to a bending moment acting on the front wheel mid-plane. Such a noteworthy loading condition is frequently encountered during the life cycle of a motorbike: consider, for instance, an emergency braking manoeuvre. Tests which simulate the effect of a hard braking on the fork are also part of the product validation programmes of the main motorbike producers. It is illustrated an analytical model useful for calculating the stress state of the fork legs under said loading condition. Such a model takes into account some architectural configurations as well as some characteristic geometrical parameters of the fork and of the motorbike. The model was validated referring to some production forks, both by finite element analyses and by experimental tests on the road. In the case of forks equipped with a single brake disc, the load unevenness between the legs during braking is analysed, and some strategies aimed at reducing such loading unbalance are suggested. The model presented herein could be helpful for designers who are developing new fork models, because it allows foreseeing critical issues due to legs dimensioning since the early phase of product development, when FEA techniques may be difficult to implement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Koch E (1901) Bicycle, U.S. Patent 680,048

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson ED (1898) Bicycle, U.S. Patent 598,186

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scott AA (1909) Improvements in or connected with the Front Forks of Motor-cycles, G.B. Patent 7,845

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feilbach AO (1914) Improvements in Forks for Velocipedes, motor cycles and the like, mG.B. Patent, 11,301

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harley WS (1925) Shock Absorber, U.S. Patent, 1,527,133

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen AF, Fisker PA (1934) Improvements in and relating to handles and front fork for cycles, particularly for motor cycles, G.B. Patent, 416,594

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schleicher R Flüssigkeitsstoßdämpfer für. Kraftradgabeln, DE Patentschrift 675, 926, 1939

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burke PW, Morris RPW, AAJ Willitt (1948) Dowty Equipment Limited, An improved telescopic strut or shock absorber, G.B. Patent, 597,036

    Google Scholar 

  9. Torre PL (1956) Spring suspension system for motorbike front wheels, U.S. Patent, 2,756,070

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roder A (1958) Schwinghebel Federgabellagerung, insbesondere für das Vorderrad von Motorrädern oder Motorrollern, DE Patentschrift, 1,043,844

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turner E (1960) Motorcycle front wheel suspension, U.S. Patent, 2,953,395

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts JP (1968) Telescoping, spring-loaded, hydraulically damped shock absorber, U.S. Patent, 3,447,797

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arces SRL (1979) Perfezionamento nelle sospensioni per motoveicoli, ITA Brevetto per invenzione industriale, 1,039,678

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kashima M (1981) Front end shock absorbing apparatus for wheeled vehicle, U.S. Patent, 4,295,658

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neupert G, Sydekum H (1986) Valvola di trafilamento per ammortizzatori idraulici pneumatici o idropneumatici, ITA Brevetto per invenzione industriale, 1,145,747

    Google Scholar 

  16. Verkuylen AHI (1988) Hydraulic shock damper assembly for use in vehicles, U.S. Patent, 4,732,244

    Google Scholar 

  17. Öhlin K, Larsson M (1992) Device associated with a spring suspension system, PCT Patent application, WO 92/16770

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shelton H, Obie Sullivan J, Gall K (2004) Analysis of the fatigue failure of a mountain bike front shock. Eng. Fail Anal 11(3):375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2007) The design and optimization of fork-pin compression coupling in front motorbike suspensions. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(13):977–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2008) Friction Coefficient Definition in Compression-fit Couplings Applying the DOE Method. Strain 44(2):170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Croccolo D, Vincenzi N (2009) A generalized theory for shaft-hub couplings. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 223(10):2231–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2009) Design improvement of clamped joints in front motorbike suspension based on FEM analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 45(6–7):406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2010) Recent improvements and design formulae applied to front motorbike suspensions. Eng Fail Anal 17(5):1173–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2011) Failure analysis of bolted joints: Effect of friction coefficients in torque-preloading relationship. Eng Fail Anal 18(1):364–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Doyle JF (2004) Modern experimental stress analysis. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pacejka HB (2002) Tire and vehicle dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2012) An analytical approach to the structural design and optimization of motorbike forks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automobile Eng 226(2):158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Belluzzi O, Zanichelli, Bologna, IT, Scienza delle costruzioni 1994

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cossalter V (2006) Lulu.com, Motorcycle, dynamics

    Google Scholar 

  30. Corno M, Savaresi SM, Tanelli M, Fabbri L (2008) On optimal motorcycle braking. Control Eng Pract 16(6):644–657

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cossalter V, Lot R, Maggio F (2004) On the stability of motorcycle during braking. In: Proceedings of the small engine technology conference and exhibition, Graz

    Google Scholar 

  32. Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Croccolo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Croccolo, D., Agostinis, M.d. (2013). The Front Suspension. In: Motorbike Suspensions. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5149-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5149-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5148-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5149-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics