Abstract
In this chapter, the authors introduce the telehydraulic fork, which has become, across the years, the most common kind of front suspension for motorbikes. In chronological order, some noteworthy patents are presented, which help the reader following the main steps of the technical evolution which gave front motorbike suspensions their current shape. Then, the behaviour of some key structural elements of the fork is examined, under the assumption that the fork is subject to a bending moment acting on the front wheel mid-plane. Such a noteworthy loading condition is frequently encountered during the life cycle of a motorbike: consider, for instance, an emergency braking manoeuvre. Tests which simulate the effect of a hard braking on the fork are also part of the product validation programmes of the main motorbike producers. It is illustrated an analytical model useful for calculating the stress state of the fork legs under said loading condition. Such a model takes into account some architectural configurations as well as some characteristic geometrical parameters of the fork and of the motorbike. The model was validated referring to some production forks, both by finite element analyses and by experimental tests on the road. In the case of forks equipped with a single brake disc, the load unevenness between the legs during braking is analysed, and some strategies aimed at reducing such loading unbalance are suggested. The model presented herein could be helpful for designers who are developing new fork models, because it allows foreseeing critical issues due to legs dimensioning since the early phase of product development, when FEA techniques may be difficult to implement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Koch E (1901) Bicycle, U.S. Patent 680,048
Thompson ED (1898) Bicycle, U.S. Patent 598,186
Scott AA (1909) Improvements in or connected with the Front Forks of Motor-cycles, G.B. Patent 7,845
Feilbach AO (1914) Improvements in Forks for Velocipedes, motor cycles and the like, mG.B. Patent, 11,301
Harley WS (1925) Shock Absorber, U.S. Patent, 1,527,133
Nielsen AF, Fisker PA (1934) Improvements in and relating to handles and front fork for cycles, particularly for motor cycles, G.B. Patent, 416,594
Schleicher R Flüssigkeitsstoßdämpfer für. Kraftradgabeln, DE Patentschrift 675, 926, 1939
Burke PW, Morris RPW, AAJ Willitt (1948) Dowty Equipment Limited, An improved telescopic strut or shock absorber, G.B. Patent, 597,036
Torre PL (1956) Spring suspension system for motorbike front wheels, U.S. Patent, 2,756,070
Roder A (1958) Schwinghebel Federgabellagerung, insbesondere für das Vorderrad von Motorrädern oder Motorrollern, DE Patentschrift, 1,043,844
Turner E (1960) Motorcycle front wheel suspension, U.S. Patent, 2,953,395
Roberts JP (1968) Telescoping, spring-loaded, hydraulically damped shock absorber, U.S. Patent, 3,447,797
Arces SRL (1979) Perfezionamento nelle sospensioni per motoveicoli, ITA Brevetto per invenzione industriale, 1,039,678
Kashima M (1981) Front end shock absorbing apparatus for wheeled vehicle, U.S. Patent, 4,295,658
Neupert G, Sydekum H (1986) Valvola di trafilamento per ammortizzatori idraulici pneumatici o idropneumatici, ITA Brevetto per invenzione industriale, 1,145,747
Verkuylen AHI (1988) Hydraulic shock damper assembly for use in vehicles, U.S. Patent, 4,732,244
Öhlin K, Larsson M (1992) Device associated with a spring suspension system, PCT Patent application, WO 92/16770
Shelton H, Obie Sullivan J, Gall K (2004) Analysis of the fatigue failure of a mountain bike front shock. Eng. Fail Anal 11(3):375–386
Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2007) The design and optimization of fork-pin compression coupling in front motorbike suspensions. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(13):977–988
Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2008) Friction Coefficient Definition in Compression-fit Couplings Applying the DOE Method. Strain 44(2):170–179
Croccolo D, Vincenzi N (2009) A generalized theory for shaft-hub couplings. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 223(10):2231–2239
Croccolo D, Cuppini R, Vincenzi N (2009) Design improvement of clamped joints in front motorbike suspension based on FEM analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 45(6–7):406–414
Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2010) Recent improvements and design formulae applied to front motorbike suspensions. Eng Fail Anal 17(5):1173–1187
Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2011) Failure analysis of bolted joints: Effect of friction coefficients in torque-preloading relationship. Eng Fail Anal 18(1):364–373
Doyle JF (2004) Modern experimental stress analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Pacejka HB (2002) Tire and vehicle dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Croccolo D, De Agostinis M, Vincenzi N (2012) An analytical approach to the structural design and optimization of motorbike forks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automobile Eng 226(2):158–168
Belluzzi O, Zanichelli, Bologna, IT, Scienza delle costruzioni 1994
Cossalter V (2006) Lulu.com, Motorcycle, dynamics
Corno M, Savaresi SM, Tanelli M, Fabbri L (2008) On optimal motorcycle braking. Control Eng Pract 16(6):644–657
Cossalter V, Lot R, Maggio F (2004) On the stability of motorcycle during braking. In: Proceedings of the small engine technology conference and exhibition, Graz
Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Croccolo, D., Agostinis, M.d. (2013). The Front Suspension. In: Motorbike Suspensions. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5149-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5149-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5148-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5149-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)