Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Female Genital Anomalies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations

Abstract

Aims: (1) to discuss the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies, with emphasis on its ability to reliably demonstrate anatomy of female genital tract. (2) to describe the MR imaging technique and sequences for a comprehensive examination of the female pelvis in order to provide all the necessary information for the correct diagnosis and treatment planning of female genital anomalies. Brief description of the reviewed data: The MR imaging features of a wide range of female congenital anomalies are discussed, describing the key imaging findings important for the correct diagnosis, and associated uterine and adnexal pathology that may be encountered. The ESHRE-ESGE classification is used in all cases with cross-reference to the AFS classification nomenclature. The strengths of MRI, such as its ability to accurately demonstrate the outer fundal contour, the zonal anatomy of the uterus and cervix, thickness and composition of the uterine wall and septa, and capability to demonstrate associated pelvic pathology and renal congenital anomalies are discussed. Clinical implications: MRI is perfectly suited for the proper diagnosis of the different classes and sub-classes of female genital anomalies, providing high quality images of the female genital tract with fine anatomic detail, which is particularly useful for clinical management and surgical planning. It also detects concomitant uterine, adnexal and unsuspected abdominal pathology that can impact management and clinical decision-making. Open issues for further research: The role advanced MRI techniques in the fertility work-up of women with female genital anomalies seems to need further clarification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(1):28–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O’Donnell R, Shulman S. Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet. 2000;94(1):9–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19–34. doi:10.1148/radiol.2331020777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray S, Skandalakis J, Broecker B. Female reproductive system: embryology for surgeons. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 816–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmonds DK. Rokitansky syndrome and other Mullerian anomalies. In: Balen AH, Creighton SM, Davies MC, MacDougall J, Stanhope R, editors. Paediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 267–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527036.022.

  6. Robbins JB, Parry JP, Guite KM, Hanson ME, Chow LC, Kliewer MA, Sadowski EA. MRI of pregnancy-related issues: mullerian duct anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(2):302–10. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, Volpato R, Iyer R. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(6):756–64. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9681-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Olpin JD, Heilbrun M. Imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(1):40–56. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181958439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shulman LP. Mullerian anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):214–22. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816feba0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezo Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10(3):199–212.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill MJ, Yoder IC, Connolly SA, Mueller PR. Imaging evaluation and classification of developmental anomalies of the female reproductive system with an emphasis on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(2):407–16. doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen JW, Cardall S, Kittijarukhajorn M, Siegel CL. Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with mullerian duct anomalies: evaluation by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(4):W381–5. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Junqueira BL, Allen LM, Spitzer RF, Lucco KL, Babyn PS, Doria AS. Mullerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intraoperative assessment with clinical imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1085–103. doi:10.1148/rg.294085737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of mullerian duct anomalies. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):E233–50. doi:10.1148/rg.326125515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Di Nola G, Franchi D, Candiani GB. Endometriosis and nonobstructive mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):515–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1401–21. doi:10.1148/rg.236025115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Propst AM, Hill 3rd JA. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341–50. doi:10.1055/s-2000-13723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Banner MP, Ramchandani P, Anderson TL, Schnall MD. High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina. Radiographics. 1997;17(5):1183–203. doi:10.1148/radiographics.17.5.9308110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haddad B, Louis-Sylvestre C, Poitout P, Paniel BJ. Longitudinal vaginal septum: a retrospective study of 202 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74(2):197–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo P. Marcal MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marcal, L.P., Nothaft, M.A.S. (2015). Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Female Genital Anomalies. In: Grimbizis, G., Campo, R., Tarlatzis, B., Gordts, S. (eds) Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5145-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5146-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics