Abstract
Aims: (1) to discuss the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of female genital anomalies, with emphasis on its ability to reliably demonstrate anatomy of female genital tract. (2) to describe the MR imaging technique and sequences for a comprehensive examination of the female pelvis in order to provide all the necessary information for the correct diagnosis and treatment planning of female genital anomalies. Brief description of the reviewed data: The MR imaging features of a wide range of female congenital anomalies are discussed, describing the key imaging findings important for the correct diagnosis, and associated uterine and adnexal pathology that may be encountered. The ESHRE-ESGE classification is used in all cases with cross-reference to the AFS classification nomenclature. The strengths of MRI, such as its ability to accurately demonstrate the outer fundal contour, the zonal anatomy of the uterus and cervix, thickness and composition of the uterine wall and septa, and capability to demonstrate associated pelvic pathology and renal congenital anomalies are discussed. Clinical implications: MRI is perfectly suited for the proper diagnosis of the different classes and sub-classes of female genital anomalies, providing high quality images of the female genital tract with fine anatomic detail, which is particularly useful for clinical management and surgical planning. It also detects concomitant uterine, adnexal and unsuspected abdominal pathology that can impact management and clinical decision-making. Open issues for further research: The role advanced MRI techniques in the fertility work-up of women with female genital anomalies seems to need further clarification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashton D, Amin HK, Richart RM, Neuwirth RS. The incidence of asymptomatic uterine anomalies in women undergoing transcervical tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(1):28–30.
Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS, Rubin A, Hill M, O’Donnell R, Shulman S. Prevalence of Mullerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet. 2000;94(1):9–12.
Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19–34. doi:10.1148/radiol.2331020777.
Gray S, Skandalakis J, Broecker B. Female reproductive system: embryology for surgeons. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 816–47.
Edmonds DK. Rokitansky syndrome and other Mullerian anomalies. In: Balen AH, Creighton SM, Davies MC, MacDougall J, Stanhope R, editors. Paediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 267–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527036.022.
Robbins JB, Parry JP, Guite KM, Hanson ME, Chow LC, Kliewer MA, Sadowski EA. MRI of pregnancy-related issues: mullerian duct anomalies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(2):302–10. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7789.
Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, Volpato R, Iyer R. Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36(6):756–64. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9681-x.
Olpin JD, Heilbrun M. Imaging of Mullerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(1):40–56. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181958439.
Shulman LP. Mullerian anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;51(2):214–22. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31816feba0.
Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezo Sardo A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10(3):199–212.
O’Neill MJ, Yoder IC, Connolly SA, Mueller PR. Imaging evaluation and classification of developmental anomalies of the female reproductive system with an emphasis on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(2):407–16. doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430146.
Allen JW, Cardall S, Kittijarukhajorn M, Siegel CL. Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with mullerian duct anomalies: evaluation by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(4):W381–5. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6595.
Junqueira BL, Allen LM, Spitzer RF, Lucco KL, Babyn PS, Doria AS. Mullerian duct anomalies and mimics in children and adolescents: correlative intraoperative assessment with clinical imaging. Radiographics. 2009;29(4):1085–103. doi:10.1148/rg.294085737.
Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of mullerian duct anomalies. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):E233–50. doi:10.1148/rg.326125515.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Di Nola G, Franchi D, Candiani GB. Endometriosis and nonobstructive mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79(4):515–7.
Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):1–14.
Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1401–21. doi:10.1148/rg.236025115.
Propst AM, Hill 3rd JA. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341–50. doi:10.1055/s-2000-13723.
Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, Banner MP, Ramchandani P, Anderson TL, Schnall MD. High-resolution MR imaging of the vagina. Radiographics. 1997;17(5):1183–203. doi:10.1148/radiographics.17.5.9308110.
Haddad B, Louis-Sylvestre C, Poitout P, Paniel BJ. Longitudinal vaginal septum: a retrospective study of 202 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;74(2):197–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marcal, L.P., Nothaft, M.A.S. (2015). Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Female Genital Anomalies. In: Grimbizis, G., Campo, R., Tarlatzis, B., Gordts, S. (eds) Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5145-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5146-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)