Skip to main content

Treatment of Patients with Non-communicating Horns with Cavity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this chapter is to present the clinical manifestations and the various alternatives for the treatment of rudimentary horns with cavity in cases of vaginal aplasia and hemi-uterus, by reviewing all the available data from case series and case reports. Complications and questions raised for the proper management are also addressed. Brief description of the reviewed data: Rudimentary horns with cavity could be found in patients with hemi-uterus and in patients with uterine aplasia. Their presence is clinically significant since it is usually associated with pelvic pain. Pregnancy in the rudimentary horn of patients with hemi-uterus is a rare life-threatening complication due to horn rupture usually during the mid-second trimester. Three dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging is the recommended diagnostic tools with high accuracy. Laparoscopic removal of symptomatic functional rudimentary horns is the established surgical treatment for those patients. Restoration of continuity is another feasible surgical treatment alternative but only in highly selected cases after thorough consultation. Clinical implications: In view of this evidence, patients with hemi-uterus or uterine aplasia should be carefully investigated for the presence of a rudimentary functional horn. Any pregnancy in a rudimentary horn of a hemi-uterus should be considered and treated as “ectopic” due to the high risk for late rupture and the resulted intra-peritoneal bleeding. Open issues for further research: Although excision of functional rudimentary horns is recommended in symptomatic patients, it is not yet clear which asymptomatic patients should be also treated. The safety, the benefits and the selection criteria for the alternative surgical option of continuity restoration need also further investigation. Another open issue is the age at what surgical approach is most convenient. Due to low prevalence of women with rudimentary functional horns, larger number of patients and a systematic review of them are essential to withdraw valuable conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Acien P, Lioret M, Chehab H. Endometriosis in a patient with Rokitansky Kuster Hauser syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1988;25:70–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aittomaki C, Eroila H, Kajanoja P. A population-based study of the incidence of mullerian aplasia in Finland. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:624–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Fertility Society, Committee for Mullerian Anomalies, Gibbons W, Buttram Jr VC, Jan Behrman S, Jones H, Rock J. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1998;49:944–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amritha B, Sumangali T, Priya B, et al. A rare case of term viable secondary abdominal pregnancy following rupture of a rudimentary horn: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2009;3:38–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakri YN, Al-Sugair A, Hugosson C. Bicornuate non-fused rudimentary uterine horns with functioning endometria and complete cervical-vaginal agenesis: magnetic resonance diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:620.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bermejo C, Ten Martinez P, Cantarero R, et al. Three dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:593–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canis M, Wattiez A, Pouly JL, et al. Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary horn and unilateral extensive endometriosis: case report. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:819–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chopra S, Keepanasseril A, Rohilla M, et al. Obstetric morbidity and the diagnostic dilemma in pregnancy in rudimentary horn: retrospective analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:907–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Contreras KR, Rothenberg JM, Kominiarek MA, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic management of a midtrimester rudimentary horn pregnancy with placenta increta: a case report and literature review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):644–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Creighton SM, Minto CL, Cutner A. Use of the ultrasonically activated scalpel in laparoscopic resection of a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. Gynaecol Endosc. 2000;9:327–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cutner A, Saridogan E, Hart R, Pandya P, Creighton S. Laparoscopic management of pregnancies occurring in noncommunicating accessory uterine horns. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;113(1):106–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Daskalakis G, Pilalis A, Lykeridou K, et al. Rupture of noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1108–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deligeoroglou E, Kontoravdis A, Makrakis E, et al. Development of leiomyomas on the uterine remnants of two women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1385–7138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deligeoroglou E, Christopoulos P, Creatsas G. A unique case of descending salpingitis and functioning endometrium in a mullerian remnant in a woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1547–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Devine K, McCluskey T, Henne M, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging sufficient to diagnose rudimentary uterine horn? A case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(4):533–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of müllerian duct anomalies. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:413–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dicker D, Nitke S, Shoenfeld A, et al. Laparoscopic management of rudimentary horn pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2643–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dulemba JF, Midgett WA, Freeman MVR. Laparoscopic management of a rudimentary horn pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:627–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Edelman AB, Jensen JT, Lee DM, et al. Successful medical abortion of a pregnancy within a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(3):886–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Falcone T, Gidwani G, Paraiso M, et al. Anatomical variation in the rudimentary horns of a unicornuate uterus: implications for laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(2):263–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Ciappina N, Fontana E, Borruto F. Laparoscopic findings and pelvic anatomy in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1111–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Di Nola G, et al. Endometriosis and non-obstructive mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:515–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Tozzi L, et al. Fertility in women with unicornuate uterus. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;102:1007–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, et al. Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:432–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fedele L, Marchini M, Baglioni A, et al. Endometrium of cavitary rudimentary horns in unicornuate uteri. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:437–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldberg JM, Friedman CI. Microsurgical Fallopian tube transposition with subsequent term pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1988;50:661–2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goluda M, Gabrys MS, Ujec M, et al. Bicornuate rudimentary uterine horns with functioning endometrium and complete cervical-vaginal agenesis coexisting with ovarian endometriosis: a case report. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:462.e9–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giatras K, Licciardi F, Grifo JA. Laparoscopy for pelvic pain in the Mayer- Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:203–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2032–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10:199–212.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grimbizis GF, Campo R. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract: the need for a new classification system. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:161–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Papanikolaou A, Theodoridis T, Tarlatzis BC. Successful isthmo-neovagina anastomosis after Davydov’s colpopoiesis in MRKH patients with functional rudimentary uterine horn. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep 6. pii: S1553-4650(14)01288-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.003. [Epub ahead of print].

  36. Heinonen PK. Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril. 1997;68(2):224–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Henriet E, Roman H, Zanati J, et al. Pregnant noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn with placenta percreta. JSLS. 2008;12(1):101–3.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kadan Y, Romano S. Rudimentary horn pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasound and treated by laparoscopy – A case report and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(5):527–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, et al. The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1456–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jurkovic D, Gruboeck K, Tailor A, et al. Ultrasound screening for congenital uterine anomalies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1320–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kawthalkar AS, Gawande MS, Jain SH, et al. Rare case of live birth in a ruptured rudimentary horn pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(8):1169–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lamarca M, Navarro R, Ballesteros ME, et al. Leiomyomas in both uterine remnants in a woman with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lanowska M, Favero G, Schneider A, et al. Laparoscopy for differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass in a patient with Mayer-Rokitanski-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, et al. Endosonographic diagnosis, pre-operative treatment and laparoscopic removal with endoscopic stapler of a rudimentary horn in a woman with unicornuate uterus. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1297–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Malik E, Mangold R, Rossmanith WG. Laparoscopic extirpation of an anaplastic ectopic uterus in a patient with Mayer Rokitansky Küster Hauser syndrome; case report. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1298–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mavrelos D, Sawyer E, Helmy S, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the non-communicating horn of a unicornuate uterus (cornual pregnancy). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):765–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Murphy AA, Krall A, Rock JA. Bilateral functioning uterine anlagen with the Rokitansky-Mayer-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Int J Fertil. 1987;32:316–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nakhal RS, Cutner AS, Hall-Craggs M, et al. Remnant functioning cervical tissue after laparoscopic removal of cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(6):768–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nahum GG. Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: the 20th century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:151–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Bess O, et al. Laparoscopic amputation of noncommunicating rudimentary horn after hysteroscopic diagnosis: a case study. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:155–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex Associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Oppelt PG, Lermann J, Strick R, et al. Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Ku ster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:57–64.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ozeren S, Caliskan E, Corakci A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and angiography for the prerupture diagnosis of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. Acta Radiol. 2004;45(8):878–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pal K, Majumdar S, Mukhopadhyay S. Rupture of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy at 37 weeks gestation with fetal survival. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;274:325–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Papa G, Andreotti M, Giannubilo SR, et al. Case report and surgical solution for a voluminous uterine leiomyoma in a woman with complicated Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Park JK, Dominguez CE. Combined medical and surgical management of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. JSLS. 2007;11:119–22.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Parkar RB, Kamau WJ. Laparoscopic excision of bilateral functioning noncommunicating and rudimentary uterine horns in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16(5):522–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Dovie MB, et al. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology. 1992;183:795–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Perrotin F, Bertrand J, Body G. Laparoscopic surgery of unicornuate uterus with rudimentary uterine horn. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:931–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rackow BW, Arici A. Reproductive performance of women with Müllerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:229–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rall K, Barresi G, Wallwiener D, et al. Uterine rudiments in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster- Hauser syndrome consist of typical uterine tissue types with predominantly basalis-like endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(5):1392–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rana A, Gurung G, Rawal S, et al. Surviving 27 weeks fetus expelled out of the ruptured rudimentary horn and detected a month later as a secondary abdominal pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(2):247–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Reddy UM, Filly RA, Copel JA. Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:145–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:415–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shahid A, Olowu O, Kandasamy G, et al. Laparoscopic management of a 16-week ruptured rudimentary horn pregnancy: a case and literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282:121–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sheng-Mou H, Chen W-C, Lin H-H, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic removal of an unseparated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168:236–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Singh J, Devi YL. Pregnancy following surgical correction of nonfused müllerian bulbs and absent vagina. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61(2):267–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Siwatch S, Mehra R, Pandher DK, et al. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a 10-year experience and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:687–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sonmezer M, Taskin S, Atabekoglu C, et al. Laparoscopic management of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: case report and literature review. JSLS. 2006;10:396–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Theodoridis TD, Saravelos H, Chatzigeorgiou KN, et al. Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with non-communicating rudimentary horn (three cases). Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:126–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tsafrir A, Rojansky N, Sela HY, et al. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: first trimester prerupture sonographic diagnosis and confirmation by magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:219–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Yeko TR, Parsons AK, Marshall R, et al. Laparoscopic removal of mullerian remnants in a woman with congenital absence of the vagina. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:218–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Yoo EH, Chun SH, Woo BH. Laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:167–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros D. Theodoridis MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Theodoridis, T.D., Grimbizis, G.F. (2015). Treatment of Patients with Non-communicating Horns with Cavity. In: Grimbizis, G., Campo, R., Tarlatzis, B., Gordts, S. (eds) Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5145-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5146-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics