Abstract
Aims: The aim of this chapter is to present the technique of neovagina formation with the use of bowel for the treatment of women with vaginal aplasia, to review the post-operative functional results and to critically report its potential advantages and limitations. Brief description of the reviewed data: From 1992 to 2014, 88 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome were referred to our gynecological surgery department for sigmoid vaginoplasty. Twenty-five were redirected toward vaginal dilation (Frank’s method), while 59 had laparatomic and the final four totally laparoscopic vaginoplasties. The surgical technique is described in detail. The functional and sexual outcomes of sigmoid vaginoplasty were assessed in 59 of them (48 treated with sigmoid vaginoplasty and 11 with vaginal dilation). Functional results and sexuality were evaluated with two standardized questionnaires: the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the revised Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS-R). Questions were added to analyze depression, body image perception, and desire for motherhood. Forty patients (68 %) responded to the requested questionnaire and regular sexual intercourse was reported by 30 (73 %) of them. The mean total FSFI score was 28 ± 3.1 in the surgical group and 30 ± 5.3 in the group treated with the Frank method. Their mean FSDS-R scores were 21 ± 12.1 and 18 ± 13.8, respectively. Clinical implications: In view of this evidence, in patients who refused or had unsuccessful vaginal dilation, sigmoid vaginoplasty, performed by experienced specialists in gynecologic and gastrointestinal surgery, appears to be an attractive alternative, having rapid and satisfactory anatomical and sexual results. Open issues for further research: Sigmoid vaginoplasty is an effective technique providing nearly normal sexual function to women with vaginal aplasia. However, further studies are needed to identify women who might benefit from this technique. Furthermore, psychological distress related to sexuality persists in most patients and demonstrates the need for multidisciplinary support.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Sneguireff FW. Un cas d’établissement d’un vagin artificiel au moyen d’une nouvelle méthod opératoire. Arch de Tocnologie et de Gynaecologie. 1892;19:568–77.
Baldwin JF. XIV. The formation of an artificial vagina by intestinal transplantation. Ann Surg. 1904;40(3):398–403.
Abd El-Aziz S. Vaginal reconstruction using the ileocecal segment after resection of pelvic malignancy. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2006;18(1):1–7.
Burger RA, Riedmiller H, Knapstein PG, Friedberg V, Hohenfellner R. Ileocecal vaginal construction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(1):162–7.
Turner-Warwick R, Kirby RS. The construction and reconstruction of the vagina with the colocecum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170(2):132–6.
Erman Akar M, Ozkan O, Ozkan O, Colak T, Gecici O. Sexual function and long-term results following vaginal reconstruction with free vascular jejunal flap. J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2849–54.
Schneider W, Nguyen-Thanh P, Dralle H, Mirastschijski U. Ileal J-pouch vaginoplasty: reconstruction of a physiologic vagina with an ileal J-pouch. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):694 e1–4.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG committee opinion. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Number 274, July 2002. Committee on Adolescent Health Care. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):167–70.
ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 355: vaginal agenesis: diagnosis, management, and routine care. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1605–9.
Committee on Adolescent Health Care. Committee opinion: no. 562: mullerian agenesis: diagnosis, management, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(5):1134–7.
Haute Autorité De Santé (H.A.S). Aplasies utéro-vaginales. Protocole national de diagnostic et de soins pour les maladies rares octobre 2012. www.has-sante.fr.
Frank R. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;35:1053–5.
Communal PH, Chevret-Measson M, Golfier F, Raudrant D. Sexuality after sigmoid colpopoiesis in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):600–6.
Carrard C, Chevret-Measson M, Lunel A, Raudrant D. Sexuality after sigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2012 Mar;97(3):691–6.
Edmonds DK. Congenital malformations of the genital tract and their management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;17(1):19–40.
Calcagno M, Pastore M, Bellati F, Plotti F, Maffucci D, Boni T, et al. Early prolapse of a neovagina created with self-dilatation and treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):267.e1–4.
Gatti C, Del Rossi C, Lombardi L, Caravaggi F, Casolari E, Casadio G. Sexuality and psychosocial functioning in young women after colovaginoplasty. J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4 Suppl):1799–803.
Cai B, Zhang JR, Xi XW, Yan Q, Wan XP. Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results. BJOG. 2007;114(12):1486–92.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1–20.
Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J. The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(4):317–30.
Derogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D’Agostino D, Wunderlich G, Fu Y. Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med. 2008;5(2):357–64.
Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clement-Ziza M, Lyonnet S, Nihoul-Fekete C. Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1107–11.
Roberts CP, Haber MJ, Rock JA. Vaginal creation for mullerian agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1349–52; discussion 52–3.
Ismail-Pratt IS, Bikoo M, Liao LM, Conway GS, Creighton SM. Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):2020–4.
Giannesi A, Marchiole P, Benchaib M, Chevret-Measson M, Mathevet P, Dargent D. Sexuality after laparoscopic Davydov in patients affected by congenital complete vaginal agenesis associated with uterine agenesis or hypoplasia. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2954–7.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G, Fontana E, Restelli E, Bruni V. The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):377 e1–6.
Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Gehrmann N, Schoenborn I, Lichtenegger W. Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):317–23.
Darai E, Soriano D, Thoury A, Bouillot JL. Neovagina construction by combined laparoscopic-perineal sigmoid colpoplasty in a patient with Rokitansky syndrome. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(2):204–8.
Darai E, Toullalan O, Besse O, Potiron L, Delga P. Anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic-perineal neovagina construction by sigmoid colpoplasty in women with Rokitansky’s syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2454–9.
Berman L, Berman J, Miles M, Pollets D, Powell JA. Genital self-image as a component of sexual health: relationship between genital self-image, female sexual function, and quality of life measures. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29 Suppl 1:11–21.
Labus LD, Djordjevic ML, Stanojevic DS, Bizic MR, Stojanovic BZ, Cavic TM. Rectosigmoid vaginoplasty in patients with vaginal agenesis: sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Sex Health. 2011 Sep;8(3):427–30.
Laggari V, Diareme S, Christogiorgos S, Deligeoroglou E, Christopoulos P, Tsiantis J, et al. Anxiety and depression in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(2):83–8.
Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. Psychological distress in women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome, MRKH). Psychosomatics. 2009;50(3):277–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raudrant, D., Carrard, C., Cotte, E. (2015). Neovagina Formation with the Use of Bowel. In: Grimbizis, G., Campo, R., Tarlatzis, B., Gordts, S. (eds) Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5145-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5146-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)