Abstract
As global warming and foreign oil dependence debates grow, more organizations are evaluating renewable energy. Renewable energy generation technologies are complex systems that have wide-ranging implications in their production and deployment. Using multiple perspectives such as social, technological, economic, environmental, and political (STEEP) and their decomposition into multiple criteria or indicators provide a broader yet explicit assessment of the technology under consideration. An effective method of determining the relative importance of a criterion with respect to others is by hierarchical decision modeling and expert judgment quantification instruments. These combined approaches can improve decision making for technology assessment and selection. This paper describes the approach through an example for photovoltaic solar technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Conti JJ (2010) Annual energy outlook 2010 ith projections to 2035. U.S. Energy Information Administration DOE/EIA-0383(2010)
Diakoulaki D, Antunes CH, Martins AG (2005) MCDA and energy planning. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, chapter 21(Springer Verlag), pp 859–898
Dincer I (1999) Environmental impacts of energy. Energy Policy 27(14):845–854
Dixon RK, McGowan E, Onysko G, Scheer RM (2010) US energy conservation and efficiency policies: challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 38(11):6398–6408
Doukas H, Andreas B, Psarras J (2007) Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables. Eur J Oper Res 182(2):844–855
Gurbuz T, Albayrak YE, Erensal YC, Ozyol M (2007) An analytic network process approach to the planning and managing of the energy politics. International conference on computers & industrial engineering, 2009. CIE 2009. 36:1690–1693
Hersh M (1997) Sustainable decision making: the role of decision support systems. In: IEE colloquium on decision making and problem solving (Digest No: 1997/366) 6:1–5
IEA (2008) Trends in photovoltaic applications—survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2007. International Energy Agency—PVPS, Report IEA
Kazmerski L (2010) Best research cell efficiencies chart. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PVeff(rev100414).png
Kocaoglu DF (1987) Hierarchical decision modeling. Engineering Management Program. Portland State University, pp 1–30
Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(3):1063–1074
Linstone H (1981) The multiple perspective concept with applications to technology assessment and other decision areas. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 20(4):275–325
Linstone H (1985) Multiple perspectives: overcoming the weaknesses of MS/OR. Interfaces 15(4):77–85
Linstone H (2010) Multiple perspectives redux. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(4):696–698
Linstone H (1999) Decision making for technology executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance. Artech House, Boston
Loken E (2007) Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(7):1584–1595
Marques AC, Fuinhas J, Manso JRP (2010) Motivations driving renewable energy in European countries: A panel data approach. Energy Policy 38(11):6877–6885
Meade LM, Presley A (2002) R & D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 49(1):59–66
Meirer P, Mubayi V (1983) Modeling energy-economic interactions in developing countries-a linear programming approach. Eur J Oper Res 13:41e59
New Energy Strategies (2010) Advanced photovoltaic technology. September 2010
New Energy Strategies (2010) Trends in photovoltaic technology. January 2010
Paidipati J, Frantzis L, Sawyer H, Kurrasch A (2008) Rooftop photovoltaics market penetration scenarios. NREL technical monitor. NREL/SR-58
Pirdashti M, Ghadi A, Mohammadi M, Shojatalab G (2009) Multi-criteria decision-making selection model with application to chemical engineering management decisions. Int J Bus Econ Financ Manage Sci 1(3):228–233
Pohekar S, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning–a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 8(4):365–381
Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Munda G, Vreeker R (2006) Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria Decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources Part B 1(2):181–193
Saaty T, Ma F, Blair P (1977) Operational gaming for energy policy analysis. Energy Policy 5(1):63–75
Samouilidis J, Mitropoulos C (1982) Energy economy models e a survey. Eur J Oper Res 25:200e15
Sharif M, Sundararajan V (1983) A quantitative model for the evaluation of technological alternatives. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 24(1):15–29
Sheikh N, Kocaoglu D (2010) A comprehensive assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies: literature review. Unpublished technical report. Department of Engineering and Technology Management, Portland State University
Shen Y, Lin GT, Li K, Yuan BJ (2010) An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology. Energy Policy 38:4604–4616
Wang J, Jing Y, Zhang C, Zhao J (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:2263–2278
Zhou P, Ang B, Poh K (2006) Decision analysis in Fawkes S (1987). Soft-systems model of energy management and checklists for energy managers. Appl Energy 27(3):229–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A: Multiple Criteria and Factors for STEEP Perspectives
Appendix A: Multiple Criteria and Factors for STEEP Perspectives
1.1 Technical Perspective
Efficiency • Module energy efficiency • Cell energy efficiency • Energy efficiency • Inherent system efficiency • Thermal efficiency • Heating value • PV system yield • Reference yield • Performance ratio • Energy density Technology maturity • Density/maturity of patents and publications • Identify positive trends • Ability to bridge technology gaps • Flexibility/scalability • Modularity • Obsolescence resistant Deployment • Large-scale/power plant installation • Field testing/evaluation/performance • Service availability (uptime of PV system) • Reliability • Power purchase agreements (PPAs) • Optimized to utility scale • Impact on meeting important energy targets • Suitable for BIPV (Bldg integrated PV) • Storage • Transmission • Distribution Resources/materials required • Avoid use of rare metals (e.g. indium) • Avoid hazardous materials (e.g. cadmium) • Resource availability/access • Chemicals, gases, etc. | Production/operations • Production capacity • No. of process steps (production processes complexity) • Leverage mature production processes (e.g. from chip mfg) • Chemicals/gases waste • Wafer thickness • Line breakage • Production maturity Maintenance/warranty • Low maintenance • Long lifetime (20 + years) • Annual degradation warranty • Management of environmental factors (dust, debris, etc.) Codes/standards—compliance • US code • National/international standards • Building/environmental safety standards Technology roadmap (2010–2030) • PV technology (cell/module) • PV technology patents/publications maturity and trends • Inverter and BOS (balance-of-system) |
1.2 Social Perspective
Public perception • Aesthetics • Visual Impact • Heterogeneous interests, values, and worldview • Engagement in public policy • Conflict with planned landscape • Synergistic with quality of life improvement policies • Impact of lifestyle • Easy/convenient to use • Legacy for future generations • Social benefits • Social acceptance • Impact on property values • Impact on tourism Employment • Job creation • Addition to employment diversity • Availability of workforce • Poverty alleviation • Increase in production employment • Increase in total employment | Health and safety • Public safety • Work safety • Hazardous health effects (accidental, long-term) • Investment in health of society (indirect) Local infrastructure development • Development/improvement of infrastructure • Support of related industry • Contribution to regional/local improvement • Regional/local empowerment |
1.3 Economic Perspective
Product costs • Capital (amortized) • Startup (amortized) • Materials • Direct production • Sales and marketing • R&D/engineering • Administrative • Facilities • Warranty/maintenance • Inverter and BOS (balance-of-system) • Installation • Disposal/recycle (end-of-life) Levelized cost of energy—electricity generation costs • Excluding plant end-of-life shutdown/disposal • Including plant end-of-life shutdown/disposal Financial analysis • Cost/benefit • ROI (return on investment) • EPBT (energy pay back time–energy viability) • LCOE* • Savings to power utilities • Portfolio costs to utilities • Costs trends/roadmap: 2010–2030 • Risk mitigation | Cost mitigation • Independent of Economies of Scale • Energy Supply Chain Advantage (e.g. against fuels) • Reduction of Administrative Costs (e.g. against imports) • Reduction in Subsidies (of fuels) • Reduction in Military Costs (for energy) • Better Use of Hard Currency (for Developing Countries) Market adoption • Market maturity • Product/technology maturity • Supply chain maturity • US Code compliance • Economic multiplier effect (through use of product) • Customer willingness to pay Positive impact on local economy • Higher wage jobs • Creation/expansion of economic clusters • Job creation Creating insourcing trend (versus outsourcing) |
1.4 Environmental Perspective
Pollution/negative impact • GHG (Green house gases—affecting climate change) • Particles (smoke, dust, etc.) • Vapor • Visual/glare • Water • Noise • Solid waste • Water resources • Stratospheric ozone • Soil • Natural habitat • Water temperature change • Wind pattern change • Forest and ecosystem • Ecological footprint (crops, woods, etc.) • During production phase • During deployment phase • Accidental release of chemicals | Environmental benefits/positive impact • Better land utilization • Climate change mitigation • Environment sustainability • Low land requirement • Energy conservation improvement • Better consumption of natural resources • Reduced fossil fuel imports/dependence • Better use of rooftops End-of-life/disposal • Biodegradability • Easy recyclability • Leverage mature production processes (e.g. from chip mfg) • Chemicals/gases waste Consumption of resources • Land • Water • Materials |
1.5 A-5 Political Perspective
Pollution/negative impact • GHG (Green house gases—affecting climate change) • Particles (smoke, dust, etc.) • Vapor • Visual/glare • Water • Noise • Solid waste • Water resources • Stratospheric ozone • Soil • Natural habitat • Water temperature change • Wind pattern change • Forest and ecosystem • Ecological footprint (crops, woods, etc.) • During production phase • During deployment phase • Accidental release of chemicals | Environmental benefits/positive impact • Better land utilization • Climate change mitigation • Environment sustainability • Low land requirement • Energy conservation improvement • Better consumption of natural resources • Reduced fossil fuel imports/dependence • Better use of rooftops End-of-life/disposal • Biodegradability • Easy recyclability • Leverage mature production processes (e.g. from chip mfg) • Chemicals/gases Waste Consumption of resources • Land • Water • Materials |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheikh, N.J., Daim, T. (2013). Use of Multiple Perspectives and Decision Modeling for Solar Photovoltaic Technology Assessment. In: Daim, T., Oliver, T., Kim, J. (eds) Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5097-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5097-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5096-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5097-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)