Semi-active Control Using Adaptive Helmholtz Resonators

  • Qibo Mao
  • Stanislaw Pietrzko
Chapter

Abstract

Active control systems want external power to operate the actuators and controller. Large power sources may be required in some applications, and it may make the control systems very bulky. In addition, the usual concerns associated with all active systems, i.e., stability robustness and actuator saturation, hold true for active sound and vibration control systems too. Semi-active devices require less energy than active devices. The main advantages of semi-active control are that it requires less power, costs less, and has reduced complexity in comparison to active system. Furthermore, the semi-active control is nearly as effective as active system. Semi-active systems are inherently passive and always stable. They are also less vulnerable to power failure. In this chapter, adaptive (semi-active) Helmholtz resonators for noise control are presented. In Sects. 7.1 and 7.2, the basic theory of the Helmholtz resonator (HR) is presented, and then an experimental setup is designed to measure the frequency response of the HR to verify the numerical results. In Sect. 7.3, the theoretical and experimental studies are presented for the sound control in rigid duct structures by using HRs. In Sects. 7.4 and 7.5, control sound transmission through double-plate structures using optimally tuned HRs is discussed, an analytical model of fully coupled structural–acoustic-HRs inside a double-plate structure is established, and then some experimental results are presented. In Sect. 7.6, the design of adaptive HRs is presented and experimentally verified.

Keywords

Sound Pressure Sound Pressure Level Acoustic Mode Traffic Noise Sound Transmission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fahy FJ, Schofield C (1980) A note on the interaction between a Helmholtz resonator and an acoustic mode of an enclosure. J Sound Vib 72:365–378CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esteve SJ, Johnson ME (2002) Reduction of sound transmission into a circular cylindrical shell using distributed vibration absorbers and Helmholtz resonators. J Acoust Soc Am 112: 2840–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mason JM, Fahy FJ (1988) The use of acoustically tuned resonators to improve the sound transmission loss of the double-partition partitions. J Sound Vib 124:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mao Q, Pietrzko S (2005) Control of sound transmission through double wall partitions using optimally tuned Helmholtz resonators. Acta Acust United Acust 91:723–731Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selamet A, Xu MB, Lee IJ (2005) Helmholtz resonator lined with absorbing material. J Acoust Soc Am 117:725–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Doria A (1995) Control of acoustic vibrations of an enclosure by means of multiple resonators. J Sound Vib 181:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seo SH (2005) Silencer design by using array resonators for low-frequency band noise reduction. J Acoust Soc Am 118:2332–2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang SK (2005) On Helmholtz resonators with tapered necks. J Sound Vib 279:1085–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bao C, Pan J (1997) Experimental study of different approaches for active control of sound transmission through double walls. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1664–1670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pan J, Bao C (1998) Analytical study of different approaches for active control of sound transmission through double walls. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1916–1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson PA, Elliott SJ (1992) Active control of sound. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bedout JM, Franchek MA, Bernard RJ, Mongeau L (1997) Adaptive-passive noise control with self-tuning resonators. J Sound Vib 202:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Esteve SJ, Johnson ME (2004). Development of an adaptive Helmholtz resonator for broadband noise control. In: Proceedings of the IMECE2004, Anaheim, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagaya K, Hano Y, Suda A (2001) Silencer consisting of two-stage Helmholtz resonator with auto-tuning control. J Acoust Soc Am 110:289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esteve SJ, Johnson ME (2005) Adaptive Helmholtz resonators and passive vibration absorbers for cylinder interior noise control. J Sound Vib 288:1105–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pietrzko S, Mao Q (2009) Noise reduction in a duct using passive/semiactive shunt loudspeakers. In: The 16th international congress on sound and vibration, Kraków, Poland, 5–9 July, 8 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pietrzko S (2010) Contributions to noise and vibration control technology. AGH/ITEE, Krakw/Radom, ISBN: 978-83-7204-786-1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qibo Mao
    • 1
  • Stanislaw Pietrzko
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Aircraft EngineeringNanchang HangKong UniversityNanchangChina, People’s Republic
  2. 2.Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologyDübendorfSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations