Advertisement

Experimental Case Studies

  • Bram de Jager
  • Thijs van Keulen
  • John Kessels
Chapter
  • 2.5k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

This chapter illustrates, with the help of two case studies, both involving design, implementation and experimental validation, the design process for energy management strategies. The first case is for a micro hybrid vehicle. Here, another method to numerically solve the optimization problem is introduced, namely Quadratic Programming, to handle the multiple decision variables used in the problem set-up for this case. The optimal solution for the powersplit is embedded in a Model Predictive Control frame work. The numerical solution allows a comparison between an optimal numerical strategy and a real-time strategy, as implemented in the vehicle. The implementation uses computing facilities that go beyond the standard ones in one of the vehicle’s computational units. The second case study is for a heavy-duty freight vehicle, namely a delivery truck. The implementation in this case uses a standard computational unit of the vehicle, which is possible by using a map-based approach. The experimental results show that the implementation of the optimal strategy is feasible and that this strategy achieves a better fuel economy than the built-in rule-based strategy.

Keywords

Fuel Consumption Fuel Economy Model Predictive Control Electric Load Internal Combustion Engine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen RW, Rosenthal TJ, Hogue JR (1996) Modeling and simulation of driver/vehicle interaction. In: SAE internat. congress & exposition, Detroit, MI, USA. SAE paper 960177 Google Scholar
  2. Åsbogård M, Edström F, Bringhed J, Larsson M, Hellgren J (2004) Evaluating potential of vehicle auxiliary system coordination using optimal control. In: Proc internat symp advanced veh control, Arnhem, The Netherlands Google Scholar
  3. Back M, Simons M, Kirschaum F, Krebs V (2002) Predictive control of drivetrains. In: Proc 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain Google Scholar
  4. Van den Bosch PPJ, Lootsma FA (1987) Scheduling of power generation via large-scale nonlinear optimization. J Optim Theory Appl 55:313–326 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buller S, Thele M, Karden E, de Doncker RW (2003) Impedance-based non-linear dynamic battery modeling for automotive applications. J Power Sources 113(2):422–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camacho EF, Bordons C (2004) Model predictive control, 2nd edn. Springer, London zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. De Jager B (2003) Predictive storage control for a class of power conversion systems. In: Proc European control conf, Cambridge, UK, pp 1–6 Google Scholar
  8. De Jager B (2004) The horizon in predictive energy storage control. In: Proc American control conf, Boston, MA, USA, pp 186–187 Google Scholar
  9. Kessels J, Koot M, Hendrix W, Ellenbroek R, Heemels M, Pesgens M, Steinbuch M, Van den Bosch P (2004) Vehicle modeling for energy management strategies. In: Proc internat symp advanced veh control, Arnhem, The Netherlands Google Scholar
  10. Kessels JTBA, Koot M, De Jager B, Van den Bosch PPJ (2005) Energy management for vehicle power net with flexible electric load demand. In: Proc IEEE conf control appl. IEEE, Toronto, pp 1504–1509 Google Scholar
  11. Kessels JTBA, Koot M, De Jager B, Van den Bosch PPJ, Aneke NEPI, Kok DB (2007) Energy management for the electrical powernet in vehicles with a conventional drivetrain. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15(3):494–505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Keulen T, De Jager B, Kessels JTBA, Steinbuch M (2012) Design, implementation, and evaluation of optimal power split control in hybrid vehicles. Control Eng Pract 20:547–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koot M, Kessels JTBA, De Jager B, Heemels WPMH, Van den Bosch PPJ, Steinbuch M (2005) Energy management strategies for vehicular electric power systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 54(3):771–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koot M, Kessels J, De Jager B, Van den Bosch P (2006) Fuel reduction potential of energy management for vehicular electric power systems. Int J Alternative Prop 1(1):112–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tate ED, Boyd SP (2000) Finding ultimate limits of performance for hybrid electric vehicles. In: Hybrid electric vehicles (SP-1560), Costa Mesa, CA, SAE paper 2000-01-3099 Google Scholar
  16. West MJ, Bingham CM, Schofield N (2003) Predictive control for energy management in all/more electric vehicles with multiple energy storage units. In: Proc IEEE internat electric machines and drives conf, vol 1. IEEE, New York, pp 222–228 Google Scholar
  17. Wipke KB, Cuddy MR, Burch SD (1999) ADVISOR 2.1: a user-friendly advanced powertrain simulation using a combined backward/forward approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 48(6):1751–1761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bram de Jager
    • 1
  • Thijs van Keulen
    • 2
  • John Kessels
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.DAF Trucks N.V.EindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations