Advertisement

Analytical Solution Methods

  • Bram de Jager
  • Thijs van Keulen
  • John Kessels
Chapter
  • 2.4k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Industrial Control book series (AIC)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on analytical solutions for the powersplit control problem defined in the previous chapter. Two well known solution concepts will be considered: the method of Lagrange multipliers and Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle. Both concepts have in common that they obtain the necessary conditions for an optimal solution by evaluating where the first differential of the augmented objective function becomes equal to zero. Illustrative examples are used to introduce each solution concept. Next, analytical expressions will be derived that solve the optimal powersplit problem under consideration. This chapter ends with a summary for both solution concepts and demonstrates the coherence between their respective optimality conditions.

Keywords

Lagrange Multiplier Performance Index Drive Cycle Brake Specific Fuel Consumption Optimal Control Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bellman RE (1957) Dynamic programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertsekas DP (2000) Dynamic programming and optimal control. Athena Scientific, Belmont Google Scholar
  3. Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L (2009) Convex optimization, 7th edn. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar
  4. Delprat S, Lauber J, Guerra TM, Rimaux J (2004) Control of a parallel hybrid powertrain: optimal control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 53(3):872–881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geering HP (2007) Optimal control with engineering applications. Springer, Berlin zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Guzzella L, Sciarretta A (2005) Vehicle propulsion systems. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  7. Hartl RF, Sethi SP, Vickson RG (1995) A survey of the maximum principles for optimal control problems with state constraints. SIAM Rev 37:181–218 MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hull D (2003) Optimal control theory for applications. Mechanical engineering series. Springer, New York zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kessels JTBA, Willems FPT, Schoot WJ, den Bosch PPJ V (2010) Integrated energy & emission management for hybrid electric truck with SCR aftertreatment. In: Proc IEEE veh power and propul conf, IEEE, Lille, pp 1–6 Google Scholar
  10. Kirk DE (1970) Optimal control theory: an introduction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Google Scholar
  11. Koot M, Kessels JTBA, De Jager B, Heemels WPMH, Van den Bosch PPJ, Steinbuch M (2005) Energy management strategies for vehicular electric power systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 54(3):771–782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lescot J, Sciarretta A, Chamaillard Y, Charlet A (2010) On the integration of optimal energy management and thermal management of hybrid electric vehicles. In: Proc IEEE veh power and propul conf, IEEE, Lille Google Scholar
  13. Liberzon D (2012) Calculus of variations and optimal control theory: a concise introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Luenberger DG (1969) Optimization by vector space methods. Series in decision and control. Wiley, New York zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Maurer H (1977) On optimal control problems with bounded state variables and control appearing linearly. SIAM J Control Optim 15:345–362 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paganelli G, Guerra TM, Delprat S, Guezennec Y, Rizzoni G (2002) Optimal control theory applied to hybrid fuel cell powered vehicle. In: Proc 15th IFAC. World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 6 pages Google Scholar
  17. Sciarretta A, Guzzella L (2007) Control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Control Syst Mag 27(2):60–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sciarretta A, Back M, Guzzella L (2004) Optimal control of parallel hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 12(3):352–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seierstad A, Sydsæter K (1987) Optimal control theory with economic applications. Advanced textbooks in economics, vol 24. Elsevier, Amsterdam zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Serrao L, Sciarretta A, Grondin O, Chasse A, Creff Y, di Domenico D, Pognant-Gros P, Querel C, Thibault L (2011) Open issues in supervisory control of hybrid electric vehicles: a unified approach using optimal control methods. In: Les rencontres scientifiques d’IFP energies nouvelles internat scient conf hybrid and electric vehicles, Rueil-Malmaison, France Google Scholar
  21. Tate ED, Boyd SP (2000) Finding ultimate limits of performance for hybrid electric vehicles. In: Hybrid electric vehicles (SP-1560), Costa Mesa, CA, SAE paper 2000-01-3099 Google Scholar
  22. Vinter R (2000) Optimal control. Systems & control: foundations & applications. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  23. Wei X, Rizzoni G (2001) A scalable approach for energy converter modeling and supervisory control design. In: Proc ASME IMECE Google Scholar
  24. Willems JC (1996) The birth of optimal control. In: Proc IEEE conf decision and control. IEEE, Kobe, pp 1586–1587 Google Scholar
  25. Zak SH (2003) Systems and control. Oxford series in electrical and computer engineering. Oxford University Press, New York Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bram de Jager
    • 1
  • Thijs van Keulen
    • 2
  • John Kessels
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.DAF Trucks N.V.EindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Electrical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations