Skip to main content

Crop Physiology in Relation to Agronomic Management Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

This chapter describes the physiology of kenaf from seed germination and root development till the effects of water and nutrients stress on grown plants. Review on kenaf agro-physiology of experiments carried out worldwide are presented and discussed mainly at the canopy and whole-plant level with the aim to help producers to make decisions and planning of production. However, few literature reports experimental results on the physiology of this multipurpose crop especially in terms of assimilation rate and its relation with environmental and agronomic factors. Knowledge on gas exchange rate and stomatal conductance may be a key support in understanding the physiology of Kenaf in terms of water requirements, its ability of light conversion into carbonaceous molecules influencing crop production potential and, indirectly, the carbon sequestration activity. In kenaf seedling development takes place when temperatures are higher than 10 °C, supporting the idea that kenaf is a macrothermal plant and optimal sowing has to be carried out during spring-summer, depending on the area of cultivation. Kenaf is very sensitive to reduced soil water availability, however, under moderate water stress conditions the crop maintains root development while reducing final biomass yield. Recent studies from Greece and Italy showed that even though kenaf uses CO2, solar radiation, water, and nitrogen less efficiently than C4 crops its assimilation rates can reach 50–58 kg of CO2 ha−1 h−1. However, great differences in terms of net photosynthesis have been reported by various authors, which may be related to the different environmental variables and agronomic managements during field and controlled experimental environments, such as air temperature, light intensity, water supply, nutrients availability, relative humidity, wind, cultivar, plant density, and soil type. Similar results were reported in the literature regarding stomatal conductance and transpiration rates. In experiments carried out during the night, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate determined water looses probably affecting the water requirement of the crop. Kenaf could be described as opportunistic in relation to water availability, with a high rate of stomatal conductance and transpiration when soil water is available but with markedly reduced leaf conductance and transpiration rate when water is limited. Extinction coefficient for light (K L ) and nitrogen (K N ), under water limited conditions, were found to be always smaller than under irrigated conditions, as a result of irregular adjustment of leaf orientation to incident radiation particularly during midday. Vertical Specific Leaf Nitrogen (SLN) distributions were found in canopies when leaf area index (LAI) was >1.5. It was observed a strong association between SLN and PAR distributions in irrigated kenaf canopies. Due to its tropical origin, kenaf behaves as a short-day plant remaining vegetative until daylength falls below 12.9 or 12.45 h. Flowering of late-maturity cultivars is under photoperiodic control; conversely, photoperiod does not influence the flowering of early maturity cultivars. Radiation use efficiency (RUE) in kenaf is positively associated with specific leaf nitrogen. RUE decreased under water deficit and nitrogen supply. Water use efficiency (WUE) decreased as the level of irrigation increased. It was higher than other C3 crops, but lower as compared to C4 crops tested in the same environments. Information on nutrient use efficiency (NUE) for kenaf is scarce and not well quantified to date. Higher NUE values were reported for micronutrients than for macronutrients. This last characteristic needs further investigation, since improvement of NUE is an essential and challenging prerequisite for the expansion of bioenergy crop productions into less fertile soils and marginal lands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdul-Hamid H, Yusoff MH, Ab-Shukor NA, Zainal B, Musa MH (2009) Effects of different fertilizer application level on growth and physiology of Hibiscus cannabinus L. (Kenaf) planted on BRIS soil. J Agr Sci 1:121–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrecht DG (1989) No-till crop establishment on red earth soils at Katherine, Northern Territory: effect of sowing depth and firming wheel pressure on the establishment of cowpea, mungbean, soybean and maize. Aust J Exp Agric 29:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou E, Christou M, Mardikis M, Chatziathanassiou A (2000) Growth and yields of kenaf varieties in central Greece. Ind Crop Prod 11:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexopoulou E, Christou M, Nicholaou A, Mardikis M (2004) BIOKENAF: a network for industrial products and biomass for energy from kenaf. In: Van Swaalj WPM (ed) Biomass for energy, industry and climate protection. Proceedings of the 2nd world biomass conference, Roma, 10–14 May 2004, pp 2040–2043

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaducci S, Amaducci MT, Benati R, Venturi G (2000) Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind Crop Prod 11:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini LG, Macchia M, Ceccarini L, Bonari E (1998) Screening of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) genotypes for low temperature requirements during germination and evaluation of feasibility of seed production in Italy. Field Crop Res 59:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angus JF, Cunningham RB, Moncur MW, Mackenzie DH (1981) Phasic development in field crops. I. Thermal response in the seedling phase. Field Crops Res 3:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anten NPR, Schieving F, Werger MJA (1995) Patterns of light and nitrogen distribution in relation to whole canopy carbon gain in C3 and C4 mono- and dicotyledonous species. Oecologia 101:504–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archontoulis SV, Struik PC, Danalatos NG (2005) Leaf photosynthesis of kenaf (cv. Everglades 41) as affected by different light intensity and temperature regimes. In: Proceedings of the 14th European biomass conference, Paris, 17–21 Oct 2005, pp 414–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Archontoulis SV, Vos J, Yin X, Bastiaans L, Danalatos NG, Struik PC (2011) Temporal dynamics of light and nitrogen vertical distributions in canopies of sunflower, kenaf and cynara. Field Crop Res 122:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archontoulis SV, Yin X, Vos J, Danalatos NG, Struik PC (2012) Leaf photosynthesis and respiration of three bioenergy crops in relation to temperature and leaf nitrogen: how conserved are biochemical model parameters among crop species? J Exp Bot 63:895–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2008) Building energy performance: a LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board. Energ Buildings 40:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Richter C, Wessolek G (1997) Modeling root growth of wheat as linkage between crop and soil. Plant Soil 190:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BS (1994) Physiological maturity determination and germination of kenaf seed. Sixth annual international kenaf conference, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin BS, Graham JW (2006) Population density and row spacing effects on dry matter yield and bark content of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Ind Crop Prod 23:244–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banũelos GS, Bryla DR, Cook CG (2002) Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind Crop Prod 15:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin C (2007) Biological science, 3rd edn. Freeman, Scott, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertheloot J, Martre P, Andrieu B (2008) Dynamics of light and nitrogen distribution during grain filling within wheat canopy. Plant Physiol 148:1707–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIOKENAF Booklet (2007) Kenaf booklet of biomass production chain and growth simulation model for kenaf (BIOKENAF) project. Contract No. QLK5 CT200201729, funded by European Commission. www.cres.gr/biokenaf

  • Bonhomme R (2000) Beware of comparing RUE values calculated PAR vs. solar radiation or absorbed vs. intercepted radiation. Field Crops Res 68:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carberry PS, Abrecht DG (1990) Germination and elongation of the hypocotyl and radicle of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in response to temperature. Field Crop Res 24:227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carberry PS, Muchow RC (1992) A simulation model of Kenaf for assisting fibre industry planning in Northern Australia. II. Leaf area development. Aust J Agric Res 43:1515–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carberry PS, Muchow RC, Williams R, Sturtz JD, McCown RL (1992) A simulation model of kenaf for assisting fibre industry planning in Northern Australia. I. General introduction and phenological model. Aust J Agric Res 43:1501–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino SL, Riggi E, D’Agosta GM (2004) Leaf photosynthesis in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in response to water stress. Proceedings of the 2nd world biomass conference, Roma, 10–14 May 2004, pp 374–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Danalatos NG, Archontoulis SV (2005) Sowing time and plant density effects on growth and biomass productivity of two kenaf varieties in central Greece. Proceedings of the international conference on industrial crops and rural development, Murcia, 17-21 Sept 2005, pp 889–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Debbie S, Michael HC (2010) Stomata. Encyclopedia of the earth. National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Pozo A, Dennett MD (1999) Analysis of the distribution of light, leaf nitrogen, and photosynthesis within the canopy of Vicia faba L. at two contrasting plant densities. Aust J Agr Res 50:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey JM (1975) Kenaf. In: Fiber crops. The University Presses of Gainesville, Gainesville, pp 203–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans JR (1993) Photosynthetic acclimation and nitrogen partitioning within a lucerne canopy. I. Canopy characteristics. Aust J Plant Physiol 20:55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field C, Mooney HA (1986) The photosynthesis-nitrogen relationships in wild plants. In: Givinish TJ (ed) On the economy of form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Turner NC (1978) Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 29:277–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti S, Patanè C, Guarnaccia P (1998) Produzione di seme di kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) in Sicilia. Agricoltura Ricerca 178:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerik TJ, Oosterhuis DM, Torbert HA (1998) Managing cotton nitrogen supply. Adv Agron 64:115–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck RD, Bremner JM (1976) Use of tracers for soil and fertilizer nitrogen research. Adv Agron 28:219–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson IE, Jensen CR, Turner NC (1989) Leaf gas exchange and water relation of Lupins and Wheat. 1. Shoot responses to soil water deficits. Aust J Plant Physiol 16:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose T, Werger MJA (1987) Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy. Oecologia 72:520–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MD, Musa MH, Talib J, Jol H (2010) Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels on kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) growth and photosynthesis under nutrient solution. J Agric Sci 2(2):49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MD, Hanafi MM, Jol H, Jamal T (2011) Dry matter and nutrient partitioning of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) varieties grown on sandy bris soil. Aust J Crop Sci 5(6):654–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA (2000) Irrigation role in enhancing water use efficiency. In: Proceedings of the fourth decennial national irrigation symposium, 14–16, Nov 2000, Phoenix, American Society of Agricultural Engineering, St. Joseph,pp 66–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis AJ, Davies WJ (1998) The coupled response of stomatal conductance to photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49:399–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49:387–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Justes E, Denoroy P, Gabrielle B, Gosse G (2000) Effect of crop nitrogen status and temperature on the radiation use efficiency of winter oilseed rape. Eur J Agron 13:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PJ (1983) Water relations of plants. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara MV, Andreo AS (2011) C4 plants adaptation to high levels of CO2 and to drought environments. In: Arun Kumar S, Venkateswarlu B (eds)Abiotic stress in plants—mechanisms and adaptations. InTech, Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, pp 415–428 ISBN 978-953-307-394-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist JL, Arkebauer TJ, Walters DT, Cassman KG, Dobermann A (2005) Maize radiation use efficiency under optimal growth conditions. Agron J 97:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lips SJJ, Iniguez de, Heredia GM, Op den Kamp RGM, van Dam JEG (2009) Water absorption characteristics of kenaf core to use as animal bedding material. Ind Crop Prod 29:73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Labuschagne MT (2009) The influence of environment and season on stalk yield in kenaf. Ind Crop Prod 29:377–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losavio N, Ventrella D, Lamascese N, Vonella AV (1999a) Growth, water and radiation use efficiency of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) cultivated in the Mediterranean conditions. In: Proceedings of the 4th biomass conference of the Americas “biomass a growth opportunity in green energy and value-added products”. Oakland, California, 29 Aug Sept 1999, pp 155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Losavio N, Ventrella D, Vonella AV (1999b) Water requirements—water and radiation use efficiency. Parameters in order to evaluate the introduction of new crops in the Mediterranean environment [Hibiscus cannabinus L.—Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.—Helianthus tuberosum L.]. Irrigazione e Drenaggio 46(2):34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lötscher M, Stroh K, Schnyder H (2003) Vertical leaf nitrogen distribution in relation to nitrogen status in grassland plants. Ann Bot-London 92:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai NTP, Kubota F (2009) Specific feature in photosynthetic response of kenaf plant (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) to flooding stress. J Sci Dev 7(2):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantineo M, Patanè C, Cosentino SL, D’Agosta G (2008) The recovery of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Ital J Agron 3:537–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanares M, Tenorio JL, Manzanares P, Ayere L (1993) Yield and development of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) crop in relation to water supply and intercepted radiation. Biomass Bioenerg 5:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matloobi M (2012) Light harvesting and photosynthesis by the canopy. In: Mohammad Mahdi N (ed) Advances in photosynthesis—fundamental aspects. InTech: Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, pp 235–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Meints PD, Smith CA (2003) Kenaf seed storage duration on germination, emergence, and yield. Ind Crop Prod 17:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milroy SP, Bange MP, Sadras VO (2001) Profiles of leaf nitrogen and light in reproductive canopies of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Ann Bot-London 87:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsi M, Saeki T (2005) On the factor light in plant communities and its importance for matter production. Ann Bot-London 95(3):549–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier AR, Syers JK, Freney JR (2004) Agriculture and the nitrogen cycle. Assessing the impacts of fertilizer use on food production and the environment. Scope-65. Island Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley J, Baldwin BS (1999) The effects of tillage treatment on the growth and development of kenaf. Proceedings of the second annual conference of the American Kenaf Society, pp 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1990) Effect of leaf nitrogen and water regime on the photosynthetic capacity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) under field conditions. Aust J Agr Res 41:845–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (1992) Effect of water and nitrogen supply on radiation interception and biomass accumulation of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in a semi-arid tropical environment. Field Crop Res 28:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC (2009) Effect of leaf nitrogen and water regime on the photosynthetic capacity of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under field conditions. Aust J Agr Res 41(5):845–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Carberry PS (1993) A simulation model of Kenaf for assisting fibre industry planning in Northern Australia. V. Impact of different crop traits. Aust J Agric Res 44:731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Davis R (1988) Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment. II. Radiation interception and biomass accumulation. Field Crops Res 18:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchow RC, Ludlow MM, Fisher MJ, Myers RJK (1980) Stomatal behaviour of Kenaf and Sorghum in a semiarid tropical environment. I. During the night. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman EI (1966) A method of estimating the total length of root in a sample. J Appl Ecol 3:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niinemets Ü (1999) Components of leaf dry mass per area—thickness and density—alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants. New Phytol 144:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbonnaya CI, Nwalozie MC, Roy-Macauley H, Annerose DJM (1998) Growth and water relations of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under water deficit on a sandy soil. Ind Crops Prod 8:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hirose T (2005) Leaf anatomy as a constraint for photosynthetic acclimation: differential responses in leaf anatomy to increasing growth irradiance among three deciduous trees. Plant Cell Environ 28:916–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanè C, Sortino O (2010) Seed yield in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as affected by sowing time in South Italy. Ind Crop Prod 32:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanè C, D’Agosta G, Copani V, Mantineo M (2007). Efficienza di uso dell’acqua in una coltura di Kenaf sottoposta a diversi regimi irrigui e livelli di concimazione azotata. In: XXXVII Convegnio Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia, Catania, pp 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Patanè C, D’Agosta G, Cosentino SL, Scandurra S (2009). Response of leaf area index, biomass accumulation and root lenght density to reduce soil water availability in kenaf cultivated in Sicily. In: Proceedings of the 17th European biomass conference, 29 June–3 July 2009, Hamburg, pp 578–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Perniola M, Tarantino E, Quaglietta Chiaranda F (1997) Light interception—radiation use efficiency and energetic yield in sweet sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L. var. saccharatum) and kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under different water availability conditions. Riv Agron 31(3):590–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervaiz M, Sain MM (2003) Carbon storage potential in natural fiber composites. Resour Conserv Recy 39:325–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons TL, Jordi W, Kuiper D (2001) Acclimation of plants to light gradients in leaf canopies: evidence for a possible role for cytokinins transported in the transpiration stream. J Exp Bot 52:1563–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portis AR Jr, Parry MAJ (2007) Discoveries in Rubisco (ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase): a historical perspective. Photosynth Res 94:121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radin JW, Boer JS (1982) Control leaf expansion by nitrogen nutrition in sunflower plants: role of hydraulic conductivity and turgor. Plant Physiol 69:771–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recous S, Fresneau C, Faurie G, Mary B (1988) The fate of labeled 15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop. II. Plant uptake and N efficiency. Plant Soil 112:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy AR, Reddy KR, Padjung R, Hodges HF (1996) Nitrogen nutrition and photosynthesis in the leaves of pima cotton. J Plant Nutr 19:755–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM (1997) Crop modeling and applications: a cotton example. Adv Agron 59:225–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggi E, Cosentino SL, Mantineo M (2004) Gas exchange and stomatal behaviour in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as affected by artificial light intensity during night measurements. Proceedings of the 2nd world biomass conference, 10–14 May 2004, Roma, pp 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivelli AR, Perniola M, Nardiello I (1998) Efficienza nell’uso dell’acqua di alcune colture erbacee sottoposte a differenti regimi irrigui: valutazione a livello fogliare. Riv Agron 32:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TL (2008) Improving nutrient use efficiency. Turk J Agric For 32:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Hall AJ, Connor DJ (1993) Light-associated nitrogen distribution profile in flowering canopies of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) altered during grain growth. Oecologia 95:488–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler GJ (1998) Influence of temperature on primary and lateral root growth of sunflower seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 40:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siepe T, Ventrella D, Lapenta E (1997) Evaluation of genetic variability in a collection of Hibiscus cannabinus (L.) and Hibiscus spp (L.). Ind Crop Prod 6:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Horie T (1989) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Sci 29:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Muchow RC (1999) Radiation use efficiency. Adv Agron 65:215–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahery Y, Abdul-Hamid H, Tahery E, Deljoo E, Mogrilan M (2011) Comparative photosynthesis and transpiration of three varieties of Hibiscus cannabinus L. (Kenaf). African. J Agric Res 6(8):2010–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Toole EH, Toole VK, Nelson EG (1960) Preservation of Hemp and Kenaf Seed. US Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin 1215. US Gov. Print Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson DJ (1952) The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv Agron 4:101–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams RL (1994) Genetic variation of the control of flowering in kenaf with emphasis on the ambiphotoperiodic response of cultivar Guatemala 4. Ind Crop Prod 2:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong SC (1979) Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia 44:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors grateful thanks Dr. Cristina Patanè of CNR-Istituto per i Sistemi Agricoli e Forestali del Mediterraneo (ISAFOM) and Dr. Orazio Sortino of University of Catania for providing data on sensitivity of kenaf to daylength.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore L. Cosentino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scordia, D., Testa, G., Cosentino, S.L. (2013). Crop Physiology in Relation to Agronomic Management Practices. In: Monti, A., Alexopoulou, E. (eds) Kenaf: A Multi-Purpose Crop for Several Industrial Applications. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5067-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5067-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics