Advertisement

Risk Assessment

  • Hing Kai Chan
  • Xiaojun Wang
Chapter

Abstract

Risk is defined by ISO 31000 (2009) as the effect of uncertainty on objectives. Generally, risks may result from different circumstances such as uncertainty in financial markets, supply chain disruptions, project failures, security breaches, quality and safety incidents, environmental causes and disasters as well as deliberate attack from an adversary or unpredictable root cause. It is therefore important to identify and assess risks in order to enable them to be understood clearly and managed effectively. According to Flanagan and Norman (1993), risk management is a process which aims to identify and quantify all risks to which the business is exposed, so that a conscious decision can be made to manage the risks. Norman and Jansson (2004) considered risk management as understanding the risks and minimising their impact by addressing, for example, probability and direct impact. Depending on whether the risk management is assessed under the context of supply chain management, engineering, financial portfolios, information technology, project management, or public health and safety, the definitions and methods for risk management can vary widely. Risk management often includes risk identification, risk assessment, risk prioritisation and risk mitigation strategies as displayed in Fig. 2.1.

Keywords

Supply Chain Risk Assessment Analytic Hierarchy Process Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahmed, A., Kayis, B., & Amornsawadwatana, S. (2007). A review of techniques for risk management in projects. Benchmarking, 14, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atasu, A., Sarvary, M., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2008). Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Science, 54(10), 1731–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baloi, D., & Price, A. D. F. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. C., Bohoris, G. A., Aspinwall, E. M., & Hall, R. C. (1996). Risk analysis techniques and their application to software development. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 467–475.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm, B. W. (1989). Software risk management. IEEE Computer. Washington: Society Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, V., & Tah, J. H. M. (2001). A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system. Advances in Engineering Software, 32, 847–857.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 35, 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, C. B. & Ward, S. C. (1997). Project risk management: processes, techniques and insights. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, S.-M. (2001). Fuzzy group decision making for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118(1), 75–78.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Z., Zhao, L., & Lee, K. (2010). Environmental risk assessment of offshore produced water discharges using a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modelling approach. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(6), 782–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chia, S. E. (2006). Risk assessment framework for project management. IEEE, (pp. 376–379).Google Scholar
  12. Childerhouse, P., & Towill, D. R. (2002). Analysis of the factors affecting real-world value stream performance. International Journal of Production Research, 40(15), 3499–3518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cho, H. M., Choia, H. H., & Kimb, Y. K. (2002). A risk assessment methodology for incorporating uncertainties using fuzzy concepts. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 78, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chun, M., & Ahn, K. (1992). Assessment of the potential application of fuzzy set theory to accident progression event trees with phenomenological uncertainties. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 37(3), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cigolini, R., & Rossi, T. (2006). A note on supply risk and inventory outsourcing. Production Planning and Control, 17(4), 424–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) (1999). Principles and guidelines for the conduct of a microbiological risk assessment, in C.A. Commission (Ed.) FAO, Rome, CAC/GL30.Google Scholar
  17. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) (2002) Food hygiene basic texts, 2nd edn, the Codex Alimentarius Commission and the FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, M. E., & Marks, H. M. (1999). Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment. Food Control, 10, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper, D. F., & Champan, C. B. (1987). Risk Analysis for Large Project. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, D., Grey, S., Raymond, G., & Walker, P. (2005). Managing risks in large projects and complex procurements. England: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Davidson, V. J., Ryks, J., & Fazil, A. (2006). Fuzzy risk assessment tool for microbial hazards in food system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157, 1201–1210.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dey, P. K. (2010). Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 990–1000.Google Scholar
  23. Dey, P. K. (2012a). Managing project risk using combined analytic hierarchy process and risk map. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 990–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dey, P. K. (2012b). Project risk management using multiple criteria decision-making technique and decision tree analysis: a case of study of Indian oil refinery. Production Planning and Control, 23(12), 903–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2006). An AHP based model for risk and opportunity assessment of international construction projects. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(1), 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., & Han, S. (2007). Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 25, 494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DurKin, J. (1994). Expert Systems: design and development. New York: Prentice Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. European Commission (2002a) European commission regulation No 178/of the European parliament and the council of 28 official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  29. European Commission (2002b) Risk assessment of food borne bacterial pathogens: Quantitative methodology relevant for human exposure assessment, European Commission Preliminary Report.Google Scholar
  30. European Council (2005). Directive 2005/32/EC of the European parliament of the council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the settings of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending council directive 92/42/EEC and directive 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC of the European parliament and of the council. Official Journal of the European Union, L191(48), 29058.Google Scholar
  31. Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction. Victoria: Blackwell Science Pty. Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Hallikas, J., Karvonen, I., Pulkkinen, U., Virolainen, V.-M., & Tuominen, M. (2004). Risk management processes in supplier networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 90, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Han, S. H., Diekmann, J. E., Lee, Y., & Ock, J. H. (2004). Multicriteria financial portfolio risk management for international projects. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 130(3), 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Handfield, R., Warsing, D., & Wu, X. (2009). (Q, r) Inventory policies in a fuzzy uncertain supply chain environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 609–619.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hastak, M., & Shaked, A. (2001). ICRAM-1: model for international construction risk assessment. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ho, C. F., Chi, Y. P., & Tai, Y. M. (2005). A structural approach to measuring uncertainty in supply chains. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(3), 91–114.Google Scholar
  37. Hoornstra, E., Northolt, M. D., Notermans, S., & Barendsz, A. W. (2001). The use of quantitative risk assessment in HACCP. Food Control, 12, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoornstra, E., & Notermans, S. (2001). Quantitative microbiological risk assessment. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 66, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang, C. (1996). Fuzzy risk assessment of urban natural hazards. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 83(2), 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang, D., Chen, T., & Wang, M. J. J. (2001). A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118, 153–165.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huss, H., Reilly, A., & Embarek, P. (2000). Prevention and control of hazards in seafood. Food Control, 11, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Iliey, B., Lindquist, M., Robertsson, L., & Wide, P. (2006). A fuzzy technique for food and water quality assessment with an electronic tongue. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(9), 1155–1168.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ISO/DIS 31000 (2009). Risk management—principles and guidelines on implementation, International Organisation for Standardization.Google Scholar
  44. Jaafari, A. (2001). Management of risk, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Juettner, U. (2005). Supply chain risk management: understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(1), 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kartam, N. A., & Kartam, S. A. (2001). Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contactors’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kelly, J. E. (1961). Critical path planning and scheduling mathematical bases. Operations Research, 9, 246–320.Google Scholar
  48. Khan, F. I., Sadiq, R., & Husain, T. (2002). Risk-based process safety assessment and control measures design for offshore process facilities. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 94, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Khan, F. I., & Haddara, M. M. (2003). Risk-based maintenance: a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16, 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Khokhar, R. H., Bell, D. A., Cuan, J., & Wu, Q. (2006). Risk assessment of e-commerce projects using evidential reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4223(2006), 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kleindorfer, P. P., Singhal, K., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management, 14(4), 482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kleiner, Y., Sadiq, R., & Rajani, B. (2006). Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based. Journal of Water Supply Research and Technology: aquaculture, 55, 81–94.Google Scholar
  53. Kleindorfer, P., & Saad, G. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Knemeyer, M. A., Zinn, W., & Eroglu, C. (2009). Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Krishnasamy, K., & Haddara, M. (2005). Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generation plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 18, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kuchta, D. (2001). Use of fuzzy numbers in project (criticality) assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee, H. L., & Billington, C. (1993). Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research, 41(5), 835–847.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, H.-M., Lee, S.-Y., Lee, T.-Y., & Chen, J.-J. (2003) A new algorithm for applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Information Sciences, 153, 177–197.Google Scholar
  59. Li, J., Huang, G. H., Zeng, G., Maqsood, I., & Huang, Y. (2007) An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 173–188.Google Scholar
  60. Lee, H. M. (1996). Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F. K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006). From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environment International, 32, 1072–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mark, W., Cohen, P. E. & Glen, R. P., (2004). Project risk identification and management. AACE International Transaction, INT.01.1-5.Google Scholar
  63. Mercuri, R. T. (2003). Security watch: Analyzing security costs. Communications of the ACM, 46(6), 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mikes, A. (2009). Risk management and calculative cultures. Management Accounting Research, 20, 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mojtahedi, S. M. H., Mousavi, S. M., & Makui, A. (2010). Project risk identification and assessment simultaneously using multi-attribute group decision making technique. Safety Science, 48, 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nagurney, A., Cruz, J., Dong, J., & Zhang, D. (2005). Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(1), 120–142.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Neiger, D., Botaru, K., & Churilov, L. (2009). Supply chain risk identification with value-focused process engineering. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ngai, E. W. T., & Wat, F. K. T. (2005). Fuzzy decision support system for risk analysis in ecommerce development. Decision Support Systems, 40(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nieto-Morote, A., & Ruz-Vila, F. (2011). A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), 434–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oehmen, J., Ziegenbein, A., Alard, R., & Schöbskebeb, P. (2009). System-oriented supply chain risk management. Production Planning and Control, 20(4), 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Parsons, D. J., Orton, T. G., Souza, J. D., Moore, A., Jones, R. & Dodd, C. E. R. (2005). A comparison of three modelling approaches for quantitative risk assessment using the case study of Salmonella spp. In poultry meat, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 98, 35–51.Google Scholar
  73. Pavlou, S. P., & Stansbury, J. S. (1998). Risk-cost trade off considerations for contaminated sediment disposal. Human Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 4(4), 991–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Payraudeau, S., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2005). Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: A review of methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 107, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Power, M. K. (2004). The risk management of everything. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  76. Rainer, R. K. J. R., Snyder, C. A., & Carr, H. H. (1991). Risk analysis for information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(1), 129–147.Google Scholar
  77. Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2007). Supply chain risk management and performance: A guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(3), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ross, T., & Sumner, J. (2002). A simple, spread-sheet based, food safety risk assessment tool. Journal of Food Microbiology, 77, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sadiq, R., & Husain, T. (2005). A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment: a case study of drilling waste. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2002). Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 505–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Seppala, J., Basson, L., & Norris, G. A. (2001). Decision analysis frameworks for lifecycle impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Serra, J. A., Domenech, E., Escrche, I., & Martorell, S. (1999). Risk assessment and critical control points from the production perspective. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 66, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sperber, W. H. (2001). Hazard identification: From a quantitative to a qualitative approach. Food Control, 12, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spengler, T., Geldermann, J., Hahre, S., Sieverdingbeck, A., & Rentz, O. (1998). Development of a multiple criteria based decision support system for LCA. Case study: Tinplate production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stansbury, J., Member, P. E., Bogardi, I., & Stakhiv, E. Z. (1999). Risk-cost optimization under uncertainty for dredged material disposal. Journal of Water Resource Planning Management, 125(6), 342–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Supply Chain council (2010). Supply chain operation reference model (SCOR) Version 10.0 Overview. URL: http://www. supply-chain.org, accessed 2010-12-10.
  87. Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 9(1), 33–45Lee, H.L., and Billington, C. (1993). Material management in decentralized supply chains. Operations Research, 41(5), 835–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tavares, T. L. (1999). Advanced models for project management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. The Royal Society. (1992). Analysis. The Royal Society: Perception and Management.Google Scholar
  91. Tolga Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). An integrated fuzzy AHP–ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 8553–8562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tuominen, P., Hielm, S., Aarnisalo, K., Raaska, L., & Maijala, R. (2003). Trapping the food safety performance of a small or medium-size food company using a risk-based model: The HYGRAM system. Food Control, 14, 573–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trkam, P., & McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—a conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tuysuz, F., & Kahraman, C. (2006). Project Risk management in oil and gas construction projects in Vietnam. International Journal of Intelligent System, 21(6), 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Walker, E., Pritchard, C., & Forsythe, S. (2003). Hazard analysis critical control point and prerequisite programme implementation in small and medium size food business. Food Control, 14, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M.-S. (2007). A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 53, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wang, X & Chan, H. K. (2011). Fuzzy-AHP approach for evaluation of green product design, 21st International Conference of Production Research, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  98. Wang, X., Chan, H. K., Yee, W. Y., & Diaz-Rainey, I. (2012a). A two-stage Fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang, X., Li, D., & Shi, X. (2012b). A fuzzy enabled model for aggregative food safety risk assessment in food supply chains. Production Planning and Control, 23(5), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. White, D. (1995). Application of systems thinking to risk management: A review of the literature. Management Decision, 3(10), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wirba, E. N., Tah, J. H. M., & Howes, R. (1996). Risk interdependencies and natural language computations. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 3(4), 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wong, C. W. Y., Lai, K.-H., Shang, K.-C., Lu, C.-S., & Leung, T. K. P. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wu, Q., & Wang, M. (2007). A framework for risk assessment on soil erosion by water using an integrated and systematic approach. Journal of Hydrology, 337, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2008). Supply risk, simulation and vendor selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wu, D. D., & Olson, D. L. (2009). Risk issues in operations: methods and tools. Production Planning Control, 20(4), 293–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Xia, D., & Chen, B. (2011). A comprehensive decision-making model for risk management of supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 4957–4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yang, D., Xiao, T., & Shen, H. (2009). Pricing, service level and lot size decisions of a supply chain with risk-adverse retailers: implications to practitioners. Production Planning and Control, 20(4), 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zeng, J., An, M., & Smith, N. J. (2007). Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2003). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zwikael, O., & Sadeh, A. (2007). Planning effort as an effective risk management tool. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 755–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwich Business SchoolUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations