Electricity Retailing

Chapter
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

“Electricity” (electric energy) is a homogeneous commodity. In principle, the nature of this commodity is unaffected by scale, i.e., the same product, namely electromagnetic energy carried over a network, is delivered to large, energy-intensive factories and small consumers in other parts of the system.

References

  1. 1.
    Assemblée Nationale et le Sénat (2010) LOI n° 2010-1488 du 7 décembre 2010 portant nouvelle organisation du marché de l’électricité. (In French, “New Organization of the Electricity Market Law”). Novemb 2010, www.legifrance.gouv.fr
  2. 2.
    Brennan TJ (2007) Consumer preference not to choose: methodological and policy implications. Energy Policy 35:1616–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boschek R (2009) The EU’s new competition policy standards. In search of effects-based, economically intuitive or efficient rules?. Intereconomics, Sept/Oct 2009. doi: 10.1007/s10272-009-0306-y
  4. 4.
    Champsaur Commission (2009) Rapport de la commission sur l’organisation du marché de l’électricité, April 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CNE, Spanish National Energy Commission (2011) Boletín mensual de indicadores eléctricos y económicos. (In Spanish, “Monthly bulletin for electrical and economic indicators”). Sept 2011, www.cne.es
  6. 6.
    Conseil de la Concurrence (2005) Avis n° 05-A-23 du 5 décembre 2005 relatif à un dispositif envisagé pour permettre aux industries électro-intensives de bénéficier de conditions spécifiques de prix d’achat de l’électricitéGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davies S, Waddams Price C (2007) Does ownership unbundling matter? Evidence from UK energy markets. Intereconomics 42(6):0Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DBERR, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2007) Fuel poverty. www3.dti.gov.uk/energy/fuel-poverty/index.html
  9. 9.
    Defeuilley C (2009) Retail competition in electricity markets. Energy Policy 37:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    EnerNOC (2011) Utility incentives for demand response and energy efficiency. http://www.enernoc.com/our-resources/white-papers/
  11. 11.
    ERGEG (2008a) Obstacles to supplier switching in the electricity retail market. Guidel Good Practice Status Rev (Ref: E08-RMF-06-03), 10 April 2008Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ERGEG, 2008b. Status Review Supplier Switching Process in Electricity and Gas Markets—Five case studies. Ref: E08-RMF-10-04. 19 September 2008Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ERGEG (2009) Status review of the liberalisation and implementation of the energy regulatory framework (C09-URB-24-03), 10 Dec 2009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ERGEG (2009b) Status review of vulnerable customer, default supplier and supplier of last resort. European Regulators’ Group for Electricity and Gas (Ref: E09-CEM-26-04), 16 July 2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (2011) Default service overview. www.mass.gov
  16. 16.
    Fetz A, Filippini M (2010) Economies of vertical integration in the Swiss electricity sector. Energy Econ 32(6):1325–1330Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flaim T (2000) The big retail ‘bust’: what will it take to get true competition? Electr J 13:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frontier Eonomics (2007) Energy costs. Public report prepared for the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal, March 2007Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    ICER (2010) A description of current regulatory practices for the promotion of energy efficiency, International confederation of energy regulatorsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEA (2011) World energy outlook 2011, International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/
  21. 21.
    IEA (2010) Energy efficiency governance, International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/
  22. 22.
    IPART, Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales (2010) Review of regulated retail tariffs and charges for electricity, 2010–2013. www.ipart.nsw.gov.au
  23. 23.
    IPCC (2007) Fourth assessment report, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/
  24. 24.
    Joskow PL (2000) Why do we need electricity retailers? Or can you get it cheaper wholesale? Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, MIT, Revised discussion draftGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knops HPA (2004) Securing Dutch electricity supply: towards a supplier of last resort? In: Roggenkamp MM, Hammer U (eds) European energy law report I. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 235–274Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Linares P, Labandeira X (2010) Energy efficiency: economics and policy. J Econ Surv 24(3):573–592Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Littlechild SL (2000) Why we need electricity retailers: a reply to Joskow on wholesale spot price pass-through. Judge Institute for Management Studies, University of Cambridge, Working Paper 21/2000Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Littlechild SL (2009) Retail competition in electricity markets—expectations, outcomes and economics. Energy Policy 37:759–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Long N, Bull P, Zigelbaum N (2011) Efficiency first: designing markets to save energy, and the planet. In: Sioshansi FP (ed) Energy, sustainability and the environment. Technology, incentives, behavior (Chapter 8). Elsevier Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lowell E (2006) Energy utility rate setting. Lulu. www.lulu.com
  31. 31.
    Loxley C, Salant D (2004) Default service auctions. J Regul Econ 26(2):201–229Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michaels H, Donnelly K (2010) Enabling innovation on the consumer side of the smart grid. MIT, Industrial Performance Center. http://www.mit.edu/ipc/
  33. 33.
    Mulder M, Shestalova V, Zwart G (2007) Vertical separation of the Dutch energy distribution industry: an economic assessment of the political debate. Intereconomics 42(6):0Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    NARUC (1973) Electric utility cost allocation manual. National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency (2007) Aligning utility incentives with investment in energy efficiency. Prepared by Val R. Jensen, ICF International. www.epa.gov/eeactionplan
  36. 36.
    Office of Energy, Government of Western Australia (2009) Electricity retail market review. Final recommendations report. Review of Electricity Tariff Arrangements. Report to the Minister for Energy, Jan 2009Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ofgem (2006) Domestic metering innovation. Consultation document. www.ofgem.gov.uk
  38. 38.
    Ofgem (2008) Energy supply probe—initial findings report. www.ofgem.gov.uk
  39. 39.
    Ofgem (2010) Review of current metering arrangements. www.ofgem.gov.uk
  40. 40.
    Pérez-Arriaga IJ, Batlle C, Vázquez C, Rivier M (2005) White paper for the reform of the regulatory scheme of the power generation in Spain (in Spanish) for the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade of SpainGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pérez-Arriaga IJ (2006) Redesigning competitive electricity markets: the case of Spain. Chapter in: Complex electricity markets. In: Mielczarski W (ed) The European power supply industry series, Technical University of Lodz, Poland. ISBN 83 921636 7 2Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    PUCT, Public Utilities Commission of Texas (2011) Chapter 25: Substantive rules applicable to electric service providers. Subchapter B. Customer service and protection. §25.43. Provider of Last Resort (POLR)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rose K, Meeusen K (2006) 2006 performance review of electric power markets. www.kenrose.us
  44. 44.
    Sioshansi FP (ed) (2011) Energy, sustainability and the environment. Technology, incentives, behavior. Elsevier Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sioshansi FP (ed) (2011) Energy, sustainability and the environment. Technology, incentives, behavior. Elsevier Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tierney S, Schatzki T (2009) Competitive procurement of retail electricity supply: recent trends in state policies and utility practices. Electr J 22(1). doi:/10.1016/j.tej.2008.12.005Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vázquez C, Batlle C, Rivier M, Pérez-Arriaga JI (2006) Regulated tariff design in a liberalized power system: the case of Spain. IIT Working Paper IIT-06-0XX, Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, MadridGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Waddams Price C (2008) The future of retail energy markets. Energy J (special edition in honour of David Newbery):125–147Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wilson R, Peterson P (2011) A brief survey of state integrated resource planning rules and requirements. Prepared by Synapse Energy Economics Inc. for the American Clear Skies FoundationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in TechnologyComillas Pontifical UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.MIT Energy Initiative, MIT and with the Florence School of RegulationEuropean University InstituteFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations