Advertisement

Signal Averaged ECG

  • Gioia Turitto
  • David M. Benson
  • Brian C. Wong
  • Nabil El-Sherif
Chapter

Abstract

The signal averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) is one of several proposed methods for non-invasive risk stratification for sudden cardiac death (SCD). The term SAECG refers to techniques improving the signal-to-noise ratio, thus allowing analysis of signals that are too small to be detected by routine measurement. Among such signals are those arising from areas of slow and inhomogeneous conduction in diseased ventricular myocardium, which may represent a substrate for malignant reentrant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A recently published AHA/ACC/HRS Consensus Document acknowledged that an abnormal SAECG may identify patients with prior myocardial infarction at risk of SCD. Given its high negative predictive accuracy, the SAECG could be useful for identification of low-risk patients. However, the document noted that routine use of the SAECG to identify patients at high risk for SCD is not adequately supported by existing data and further studies would be required to assess the utility of this test. It is possible that improved risk stratification may be accomplished if the SAECG is utilized as part of an algorithm in conjunction with other risk stratifiers. Large prospective studies to develop a robust prediction model are still warranted.

Keywords

Signal averaging Sudden cardiac death Ventricular tachycardia Ventricular fibrillation Risk stratification 

References

  1. 1.
    El-Sherif N, Gough WB, Restivo M. Electrophysiologic correlates of ventricular late potentials. In: El-Sherif N, Turitto G, editors. High-resolution electrocardiography. Mount Kisco: Futura; 1992. p. 279–98.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simson MB. Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1981;64:235–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R. High-resolution electrocardiography: historical perspectives. In: El-Sherif N, Turitto G, editors. High-resolution electrocardiography. Mount Kisco: Futura; 1992. p. 3–20.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breithardt G, Cain ME, El-Sherif N, Flowers NC, et al. Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a Task Force Committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:999–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cain ME. Signal-averaged electrocardiography. ACC Expert Consensus Document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:238–49.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberger JJ, Cain ME, Hohnloser SH, et al. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation/Heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1179–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caref EB, Turitto G, Ibrahim BB, et al. Role of bandpass filters in optimizing the value of signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a predictor of the results of programmed stimulation. Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:16–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vazquez R, Caref EB, Torres F, Reina M, Ortega F, El-Sherif N. Short-term reproducibility of time domain, spectral temporal mapping, and spectral turbulence analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in normal subjects and patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1995;130:1011–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steinbigler P, Haberl R, Bruggeman T, et al. Postinfarction risk assessment for sudden cardiac death using late potential analysis of the digital Holter electrocardiogram. J Cardiovasc Electro­physiol. 2002;13:1227–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roche F, DaCosta A, Karnib I, et al. Arrhythmic risk stratification after myocardial infarction using ambulatory electrocardiography signal averaging. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:791–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cain ME, Ambos HD, Markham J, Lindsay BD, Arthur RM. Diagnostic implications of spectral and temporal analysis of the entire cardiac cycle in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1991;83:1637–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haberl R, Jilge G, Putler R, Steinbeck G. Spectral mapping of the electrocardiogram with Fourier transform for identification of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 1989;10:316–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelen GJ, Henkin R, Starr A-M, Caref EB, Bloomfield D, El-Sherif N. Spectral turbulence analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and its predictive accuracy for inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:965–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hnatkova K, Kulakowski P, Staunton A, Camm AJ, Malik M. Wavelet decomposition of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram used for the risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction. In: Computers in cardiology. Maryland: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1994. p. 673–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan EKY. Acceleration spectrum analysis: a novel quantitative method for frequency domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 1996;1:306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vazquez R, Caref EB, Torres F, Reina M, Guerrero JA, El-Sherif N. Reproducibility of time-domain and three different frequency-domain techniques for the analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol. 2000;33:99–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. Circulation. 1986;74:1280–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turitto G, Caref EB, Macina G, Fontaine JM, Ursell SN, El-Sherif N. Time course of ventricular arrhythmias and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in the post-infarction period: a prospective study of correlation. Br Heart J. 1988;60:17–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    El-Sherif N, Ursell SN, Bekheit S, et al. Prognostic significance of the signal-averaged ECG depends on the time of recording in the postinfarction period. Am Heart J. 1989;118:256–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gomes AJ, Winters SL, Martinson M, et al. The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:531–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomes JA, Winters SL, Stewart D, et al. A new ­noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction based on signal-­averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:349–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cripps T, Bennett D, Camm J, et al. Prospective evaluation of clinical assessment, exercise testing and signal-averaged electrocardiogram in predicting outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62:995–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahuja RK, Turitto G, Ibrahim BB, Caref EB, El-Sherif N. Combined time-domain and spectral turbulence analysis of the signal-averaged ECG improves its predictive accuracy in postinfarction patients. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27(Suppl):202–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Denes P, El-Sherif N, Katz R, et al. Prognostic significance of signal-averaged electrocardiogram after thrombolytic therapy and/or angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction (CAST substudy). Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:216–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Camm AJ, Fei L. Risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17(Pt 2):401–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    El-Sherif N, Denes P, Katz R, et al. Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arrhythmic events in the postinfarction period. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:908–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reinhardt L, Makijarvi M, Fetsch T, et al. Noninvasive risk modeling after myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:627–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Chillou C, Sadoul N, Bizeau O, et al. Prognostic value of thrombolysis, coronary artery patency, signal-averaged electrocardiography, left ventricular ejection fraction, and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias after a first acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:852–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bailey JJ, Berson AS, Handelsman H, Hodges M. Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1902–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Turitto G, Sorgato A, Alakhras M, El-Sherif N. QRS averaging. In: Zareba W, Maison-Blanche P, Locati EH, editors. Noninvasive electrocardiology in clinical practice. Armonk: Futura; 2001. p. 49–69.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ikeda T, Sakata T, Takami M, et al. Combined assessment of T-wave alternans and late potentials used to predict arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. A prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:722–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hohnloser SH, Franck P, Klingenheben T, Zabel M, Just H. Open infarct artery, late potentials, and other prognostic factors after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. A prospective trial. Circulation. 1994;90:1747–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Huikuri HV, Tapanainen JM, Lindgren K, et al. Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:652–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bauer A, Guzik P, Barthel P, et al. Reduced prognostic power of ventricular late potentials in post-infarction patients of the reperfusion era. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:755–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huikuri HV, Raatikainen MJP, Moerch-Joergensen R, et al. Prediction of fatal or near-fatal cardiac arrhythmia events in patients with depressed left ventricular function after an acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:689–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rashba EJ, Lamas GA, Couderc J-P, et al. Electrophysiological effects of late percutaneous coronary intervention for infarct-related coronary artery occlusion. The Occluded Artery Trial – Electrophysiological Mechanisms (OATEP). Circulation. 2009;119:779–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Turitto G, Fontaine JM, Ursell SN, Caref EB, Henkin R, El-Sherif N. Value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a predictor of the results of programmed stimulation in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:1272–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Turitto G, Ahuja R, Bekheit S, Caref EB, Ibrahim B, El-Sherif N. Incidence and prediction of induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:770–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Turitto G, Rao S, Caref EB, El-Sherif N. Time- and frequency-domain analysis of the signal averaged electrocardiogram in patients with ventricular tachycardia and ischemic versus non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27(Suppl):213–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Turitto G, Fontaine JM, Ursell SN, Caref EB, Bekheit S, El-Sherif N. Risk stratification and management of patients with organic heart disease and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia: role of programmed stimulation, left ventricular ejection fraction and the signal averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Med. 1990;88(1):35N–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turitto G, Ahuja RK, Caref EB, et al. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: role of programmed ventricular stimulation and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1523–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gomes JA, Cain ME, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Lee KL, Hafley GE. Prediction of long-term outcomes by signal-averaged electrocardiography in patients with unsustained ventricular tachycardia, coronary artery disease, and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2001;104:436–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mancini DM, Wong KL, Simson MB. Prognostic value of an abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with nonischemic congestive cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1993;87:1083–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fauchier L, Babuty D, Cosnay P, Poret P, Rouesnel P, Fauchier JP. Long-term prognostic value of time domain analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiography in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:618–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grimm W, Christ M, Bach J, Muller HH, Maisch B. Noninvasive arrhythmia risk stratification in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: results of the Marburg Cardiomyopathy Study. Circulation. 2003;108:2883–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cripps TR, Counihan PJ, Frenneaux MP, Ward DE, Camm AJ, McKenna WJ. Signal-averaged electrocardiography in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:956–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kulakowski P, Counihan PJ, Camm AJ, McKenna WJ. The value of time and frequency domain, and spectral temporal mapping analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in identification of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at increased risk of sudden death. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:941–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McKenna WJ, Thiene G, Nava A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J. 1994;71:215–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force criteria. Circulation. 2010;121:1533–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Marcus FI, Zareba W, Calkins H, et al. Arrhyth-mogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia, clinical presentation and diagnostic evaluation: results from the North American Multidisciplinary Study. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:984–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kamath GS, Zareba W, Delaney J, et al. Value of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:256–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Krahn AD, Healey JS, Chauhan V, et al. Systematic assessment of patients with unexplained cardiac arrest: Cardiac Arrest Survivors with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (CASPER). Circulation. 2009;120:278–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Behr ER, Dalageorgou C, Christiansen M, et al. Sudden arrhythmic death syndrome: familial evaluation identifies inheritable heart disease in the majority of families. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1670–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ajiro Y, Hagiwara H, Kasanuki H. Assessment of markers for identifying patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ikeda T, Takami M, Sugi K, Mizusawa Y, Sakurada H, Yoshino H. Noninvasive risk stratification of subjects with a Brugada-type electrocardiogram and no history of cardiac arrest. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005;10:396–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Huang Z, Patel C, Li W, et al. Role of signal-­averaged electrocardiograms in arrhythmic risk stratification of patients with Brugada syndrome: a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gioia Turitto
    • 1
  • David M. Benson
    • 1
  • Brian C. Wong
    • 1
  • Nabil El-Sherif
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineNew York Methodist HospitalBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineNew York Harbor Veterans Administration Healthcare SystemBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations