Skip to main content

Abstract

Use of radial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased greatly in recent years although uptake varies widely throughout the world. While an increasing body of evidence supports use of the radial artery as a safe access route for PCI, a ‘radial learning curve’ remains an obstacle to uptake, especially for established femoral operators seeking to increase the proportion of radial procedures. Untreated radial artery spasm is not only painful, but may result in patient harm if alternate arterial access (e.g. the femoral artery) is unavailable. An understanding of simple procedural modifications can be the difference between procedural success and failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and working groups on acute cardiac care and thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013;8(11):1242–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, Kim JY, Lee SH, Hwang SO, Choe KH. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:421–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:173–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L. Evaluation of the unipalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the modified Allen’s test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J. 2004;147:489–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeserich M, Just H. Effect of nitrates on arterial blood vessels exemplified by the radial artery. Z Kardiol. 1998;87(2):77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiemeneij F, Vajifdar BU, Eccleshall SC, et al. Evaluation of a spasmolytic cocktail to prevent radial artery spasm during coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58:281–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F, Thébault B, Chauveau M, Ben Hamda K, et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39(4):365–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertrand OE, Rao SV, Pancholy S, Jolly SS, Rodés-Cabau J, Larose E, et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(10):1022–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(5):475–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozak M, Adams DR, Ioffreda MD. Sterile inflammation associated with transradial catheterization and hydrophilic sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;59:207–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah A, Kintur S. Balloon assisted tracking of a guide catheter through radial artery loop and spasm. Cath Lab Digest. 2013;21(2):24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopouos E, Behan M, Butler R, Hetherington SL, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedure outcome. Heart. 2009;95:410–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts DH, Wiper A. Vascular access: femoral versus radial. In: Redwood S, Curzen N, Thomas M, editors. Oxford textbook of interventional cardiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damian J. Kelly BMedSci. MBChB (Hons.), MD, MRCP .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelly, D.J. (2016). Preventing and Treating Radial Spasm. In: Lindsay, A., Chitkara, K., Di Mario, C. (eds) Complications of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4959-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4959-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4958-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4959-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics