Worldwide Nuclear Energy Research Programs

  • Greg F. Naterer
  • Ibrahim Dincer
  • Calin Zamfirescu
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, worldwide research efforts on advanced nuclear energy systems for power, heat, and hydrogen generation are presented. It is shown that the next generation of nuclear reactors will create a new energy paradigm shift by significantly improving the fuel utilization efficiency of nuclear reactors via increased operating temperatures and a reactor’s capability to cogenerate high-temperature process heat, power, and hydrogen. In former generations of nuclear plants, the coolant temperature was typically limited to ~300 °C leaving only larger size scale-up as the option for efficiency increases and cost per kWh reductions.

Generation of hydrogen via coal gasification, natural gas reforming, and petroleum naphtha reforming is used by many countries as a transitional phase towards a fully implemented hydrogen infrastructure which will use extraction of hydrogen from water. The Generation IV International Forum (GIF) was formed as an initiative of the US Department of Energy to lead an international cooperation on development of the next generation of nuclear reactors with hydrogen production capabilities. Six reactor concepts were selected by GIF as the most promising for commercial implementation. In addition, there are two major research and development efforts worldwide on thermochemical water splitting processes: the sulfur–iodine cycle and the copper–chlorine cycle.

Keywords

Graphite Carbide Urea Europe Cadmium 

References

  1. DOE (2002) A technology roadmap for generation IV nuclear energy systems. US DOE Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International ForumGoogle Scholar
  2. DOE (2011) Department of Energy—Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems. http://www.ne.doe.gov/genIV/neGenIV3.html. Accessed October 2011
  3. GIF (2011) Generation IV International Forum. http://www.gen-4.org. Accessed October 2011
  4. INERI (2009) International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative. Annual report. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  5. INPRO (2011) International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles. http://www.iaea.org/INPRO/. Accessed October 2011
  6. Koster A, Matzner HD, Nicholsi DR (2003) PMBR design for the future. Nucl Eng Des 222:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kubo S, Nakajima H, Kasahara S, Higashi S, Masaki T, Abe H, Onuki K (2004) A demonstration study on a closed-cycle hydrogen production by the thermochemical water-splitting iodine–sulfur process. Nucl Eng Des 233:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Latour SR, Menningmann JG, Blaney BL (1982) Waste heat recovery potential in selected industries. US Environmental Protection Agency—Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory Report # EPA-600/S7-82-030Google Scholar
  9. WNA (2011) World Nuclear Association. http://www.world-nuclear.org. Accessed October 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg F. Naterer
    • 1
  • Ibrahim Dincer
    • 2
  • Calin Zamfirescu
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Applied ScienceUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations