Stereoscopic 3D in Computers

  • Jon Peddie


When first explored and demonstrated, Stereovision (S3D) was a novelty and to some degree still is today. For some situations such as visualization of computer-aided design and medical analysis, S3D is a valuable and necessary capability. For commercial applications such as signage point-of-sale systems, it can be very helpful in communicating the size, scale and details of a product. In entertainment systems such as the cinema, TV, PCs, and mobile devices like smartphones and tablets, the technology can enhance the experience but the result is heavily dependent on the quality and construct of the content. And in static or semi-static devices such as digital picture frames, S3D is a conversation piece and is usually interesting. The illusion of depth or perspective was first explored in paintings of the early middle ages to enhance the illusion of space. Photogrammetry is the technique of measuring objects (2D or 3D) from photographs; it date back to 1525. Auto-stereoscopic, also known as “glasses-free”, displays are found in mobile devices such as handheld game consoles, tablets, and smartphones and potentially in cameras and handheld GPS devices. Active shutter glasses switch off or block light alternately at a frame rate that is acceptable to the human eye’s persistence level. It may be a cliché but stereovision does allow the viewer to see more, and can when the content is mastered correctly, give a greater sense of realism, and bring the true 3D’ness out.


Virtual Reality Star Trek Shutter Glass Lenticular Lens Stereo Viewing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Dürer, A. (1525). The painter’s manual. (Walter L. Strauss, Trans.). Nuremberg: Abaris Books, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Introduction to photogrammetry, aerial archive. Institute for Prehistory and Protohistory, University of Vienna.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Doyle, F. (1964). The historical development of analytical photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 46(7), 923–936.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Deville, É. (1895). Photographic surveying: Including the elements of descriptive geometry and perspective (Rev. ed.). Ottawa: Government Printing Bureau.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Lipton, L. (2010). Inventing crystaleyes, part 2.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Rollmann, W. (1983). Zwei neue stereoskopische Methoden. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 90, 186 pp.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gentle, J. E., Härdle, W. K., & Mori, Y. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of computational statistics. Berlin: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision.—Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371–394.
  14. 14.
    This work was first published in Cold Spring Harbour symposium on quantitative biology, Vol. 36, p 577.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortony, A. (1970). The transmission – reflection method for stereo viewing. The Computer Journal, 14(2), 140–144.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Max, N. L. (1982). Computer representation of molecular surfaces. Journal of Medical Systems, 6(5), 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Fergason, J. L., Robinson, S. D., McLaughlin, C. W., Brown, B., Abileah, A., Baker, T. E., & Green, P. J. (2005). An innovative beamsplitter-based stereoscopic/3D display design. IS&T/SPIE 17th annual symposium – electronic imaging science and technology, San Jose, 16–20 Jan 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    It grabbed everybody’s attention, Iwata interviews.
  25. 25.
    Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2003). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design (The Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2000). Understanding virtual reality interface, application, and design (The Morgan Kaufmann series in computer graphics). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, an imprint of Elsevier Science, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Father Of Virtual Reality.
  28. 28.
    Packer, R. (2002). Multimedia: From Wagner to virtual reality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sutherland, I. E. (1968). A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the fall joint computer conference (pp. 757–764). Montvale: AFIPS Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boden, M. A. (2006). Mind as machine: A history of cognitive science (Vol. 2). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sutherland, I. E. (1965). The ultimate display. Proceedings of IFIPS Congress 1965, New York, 2, 506–508.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peters, T., Moore, J., Guiraudon, G., Jones, D., Bainbridge, D., Wiles, A., Linte, C., & Wedlake, C. (2006, December 13). Inside the beating heart: Toward a less-invasive approach to surgery. SPIE Newsroom. doi: 10.1117/2.1200611.0495,
  33. 33.
    Edelsbrunner, H., Fu, P., & Qian, J. (1996). Geometric modeling in CAVE. Department of Computer Science and National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gombrich, E. H. (1972, April). Symbolic images: studies in the art of the renaissance (p. 158). Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Peddie
    • 1
  1. 1.Jon Peddie ResearchTiburonUSA

Personalised recommendations