Abstract
A growing number of Danish manufacturing companies feel compelled to offshore greater or smaller parts of their organisation. Drawing on organisational theory and, the concept of knowledge governance, this chapter examines two SMEs in the textile and the furniture sector, highlighting the knowledge-management intersection. The two case studies show one SME reorganising its processes and integrating knowledge through a mainly captive knowledge governance set-up; the other deorganises, disintegrates and, to a certain extent, “compensates” with virtual organisational elements: exercising knowledge governance through IT systems as well as through the establishment of an offshored physical intermediary control element. Furthermore, both case companies work with so-called soft knowledge governance approaches, in one case through the introduction of corporate social responsibility in the new captive set-up and in the other case through the specific selection of new suppliers and their capability/competence building over time. Organisation design approaches would focus on the initial diagnosis, choice and implementation of a “new” organisation. However, the organisations studied experience emergent organisational design elements over time. Furthermore, they are involved in dynamically tackling the learning of the organisational players as well as the dynamics of their relationships with cooperating partners regarding maintaining and developing their innovation capability. To manage these challenges, both case companies choose to revisit the organisational design elements and reconfigure their organisational design set-up, indicating a need to reinstate the classic design components along with a more dynamic perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution. Organ stud 18(1):93–117
Barnatt C (1995) Office space, cyberspace and virtual organisation. J Gen Manag 20(4):78–92
Buser M, Poschet L, Pulver B (2000) Télématique et nouvelles formes de travail. TA- report 35a. Conseil suisse de la science, Bern
Carlile P (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci 15(5):555–568
Castells M (2000) The rise of the network society, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Cambridge
Choi CJ, Cheng P, Hilton B, Russell E (2005) Knowledge governance. J Knowl Manag 9(6):67–75
Cummings TG, Worley CG (2005) Organization development and change, 8th edn. Cengage, New York
Ensign PC (1998) Interdependence, coordination, and structure in complex organizations: implications for organization design. Mid Atlantic J Bus 34(1):5–23
Foss NJ (2007) The emerging knowledge governance approach: challenges and characteristics. Organization 14(1):29–52
Foss NJ, Husted K, Michailova S, Pedersen T (2003) Governing knowledge processes: theoretical foundations and research opportunities. In: CKG working paper 1/2003, the center for knowledge governance, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen
Grandori A (1997) Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. J Manag Gov 1:29–47
Hinds P, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed work: new ways of working across distance using technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jørgensen C (2010) Offshore supplier relations: knowledge integration among small businesses. Strateg Outsourcing Int J 3(3):192–210
Koch C, Buser M (2003) Getting hold of the disappearing worker?—managerial issues of distance work. In: Zedtwitz MV, Haour G, Khalil T, Lefebvre L (eds) Management of technology: growth through business, innovation and entrepreneurship. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 481–495
Michailova S, Foss NJ (2009) Knowledge governance: themes and questions. In: Foss NJ, Michailova S (eds) Knowledge governance—processes and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24
Mintzberg H (1993) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York
Okkonen J (2004) How virtuality affects knowledge work: points on performance and knowledge management. Int J Network Virtual Organ 2(2):153–161
Peltokorpi V, Tsuyuki E (2006) Knowledge governance in Japanese project-based organization. Knowl Manag Res Pract 4:36–45
Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organ Sci 1(3):267–292
Scarbrough H, Amaeshi K (2009) Knowledge governance for open innovation: evidence from an EU R&D collaboration. In: Foss NJ, Michailova S (eds) Knowledge governance: perspectives, processes and problems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 220–246
Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged scholarship—a guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM (2002) Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jørgensen, C., Koch, C. (2013). SMEs De- or Reorganising Knowledge When Offshoring?. In: Pedersen, T., Bals, L., Ørberg Jensen, P., Larsen, M. (eds) The Offshoring Challenge. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4908-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4908-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4907-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4908-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)