Skip to main content

Exploring the Differences Between the Cross Industry Process for Data Mining and the National Intelligence Model Using a Self Organising Map Case study

  • Chapter
Business Intelligence and Performance Management

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

All Police Analysts in the UK, and many Forces in Europe and the USA, use the National Intelligence Model as a means to provide relevant, timely and actionable intelligence. In order to produce the required documentation analysts have to mine a variety of in-house data systems but do not receive any formal data mining training. The Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining is a database agnostic data mining methodology which is logical and easy to follow. By using a self-organising map to suggest offenders who may be responsible for sets of house burglary, this study explores the difference between both processes and suggests that they could be used to complement each other in real Police work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Police Grant (England and Wales) 2012/13, The Stationary Office, London, HC 1797

    Google Scholar 

  2. Police Grant (England and Wales) 2011/12, The Stationary Office, London, HC 1771

    Google Scholar 

  3. Police Grant (England and Wales) 2010/11, The Stationary Office, London, HC 278

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dhani, A.: Police Service Strength England and Wales, 30 September 2011, HOSB 3/12, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaplin, R., Flatley, J., Smith, K.: Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 findings from the British Crime survey and police recorded crime (2nd edn.), HOSB: 10/11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crime shows biggest rise for a decade (2012), Mail online. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-123421/Crime-shows-biggest-rise-decade.html. Accessed 30th August 2012

  7. The National Intelligence Model (2000), National Criminal Intelligence Service, http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intelligenceanalysis.net%2FNational%2520Intelligence%2520Model.pdf&ei=E9pqUJyjDoPB0QXBw4GACQ&usg=AFQjCNFQosPKkpMvj9RRKNhW9WJpeuzMLQ. Accessed on 2nd October 2012

  8. Shearer, C.: The CRISP-DM model: the new blueprint for data mining. J. Data Warehous. 5, 13–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, X., Kumar, V., Quinlan, J.R., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G.J., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P.S., Zhou, Z.-H., Steinbach, M., Hand, D.J., Steinberg, D.: Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 1–37 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2, vol. 12, pp. 1137–1143. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adderley, R.: The use of data mining techniques in active crime fighting. In: International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control Technologies and the 9th International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando, 31 July–3 August 2003, pp. 356–361 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A E Solutions (BI) Ltd (2012) Authority miner, http://a-esolutions.com/index.php?id=authority-miner. Accessed 4th September 2012

  14. IBM SPSS Modeler (2012), http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/modeler. Accessed 2nd October 2012

  15. WEKA (2012), http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka. Accessed 2nd October 2012

  16. SAS (2012), http://www.sas.com/technologies/analytics/datamining/index.html. Accessed 2nd October 2012

  17. Kohonen, T.: Self organising formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43(1), 59–69 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Home Office Counting Rules For Recorded Crime, HMSO 2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brantingham, P., Brantingham, P.: Crime pattern theory. In: Wortley, R., Mazerolle, L. (eds.) Enviromental Criminology and Crime Analysis, pp. 78–93 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Adderley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adderley, R. (2013). Exploring the Differences Between the Cross Industry Process for Data Mining and the National Intelligence Model Using a Self Organising Map Case study. In: Rausch, P., Sheta, A., Ayesh, A. (eds) Business Intelligence and Performance Management. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4866-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4866-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4865-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4866-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics