Abstract
Chest pain and normal coronary angiography is seen in up 30 % of patients undergoing the investigation. Despite its notable prevalence, the epidemiology of the condition remains poorly documented. Since the turn of the twentieth century, researchers have been baffled by “unmistakable” angina in the absence of coronary artery disease. Curiosity as to the cardiac aetiology of this chest pain became the focus of several key studies investigating the clinical and haemodynamic features of patients with normal coronary angiography. From these early findings, the cardinal features of three specific disorders associated with normal coronary angiography were established – Cardiac Syndrome X, Microvascular Angina and more recently, the Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon. Although ambiguity in the literature exists, it is likely that an ‘ischemic’ mechanism for the chest pain in these patients is explained by coronary microvascular dysfunction. It also now understood that despite the absence of significant coronary artery disease, the outcomes of patients are not entirely favourable, with studies suggesting a frequent persistence of chest pain, and increased risk of cardiac events, particularly among women. This chapter will review the available epidemiological data on patients with chest pain and normal coronary angiography, and the clinical features and possible aetiological explanations for the specific coronary microvascular disorders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ACS:
-
Acute coronary syndrome
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CHD:
-
Coronary heart disease
- CSFP:
-
Coronary slow flow phenomenon
- GUSTO:
-
Global utilization of streptokinase and t-PA for occluded coronary arteries
- MI:
-
Myocardial infarction
- NCA:
-
Normal coronary angiography
- TIMI:
-
Thrombosis in myocardial infarction
- WISE:
-
Women’s ischemia syndrome evaluation
References
Maseri A. The coronary circulation. In: Maseri A, editor. Ischemic heart disease. A rational basis for clinical practice and clinical research. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 71–104.
Osler W. The lumleian lectures on angina pectoris. Lancet. 1910;175:697.
Likoff W, Segal BL, Kasparian H. Paradox of normal selective coronary arteriograms in patients considered to have unmistakable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1967;276(19):1063–6.
Arbogast R, Bourassa MG. Myocardial function during atrial pacing in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms. Comparison with patients having significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1973;32(3):257–63.
Kemp Jr HG. Left ventricular function in patients with the anginal syndrome and normal coronary arteriograms. Am J Cardiol. 1973;32(3):375–6.
Opherk D, et al. Reduced coronary dilatory capacity and ultrastructural changes of the myocardium in patients with angina pectoris but normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation. 1981;63(4):817–25.
Cannon 3rd RO, Epstein SE. “Microvascular angina” as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(15):1338–43.
Tambe AA, et al. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries – a new angiographic finding. Am Heart J. 1972;84(1):66–71.
Beltrame JF, Limaye SB, Horowitz JD. The coronary slow flow phenomenon – a new coronary microvascular disorder. Cardiology. 2002;97(4):197–202.
Kemp Jr HG, et al. The anginal syndrome associated with normal coronary arteriograms. Report of a six year experience. Am J Med. 1973;54(6):735–42.
Marchandise B, et al. Angiographic evaluation of the natural history of normal coronary arteries and mild coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41(2):216–20.
Pasternak RC, et al. Chest pain with angiographically insignificant coronary arterial obstruction. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up. Am J Med. 1980;68(6):813–17.
Papanicolaou MN, et al. Prognostic implications of angiographically normal and insignificantly narrowed coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1986;58(13):1181–7.
Wong WM, et al. Population based study of noncardiac chest pain in southern Chinese: prevalence, psychosocial factors and health care utilization. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10(5):707–12.
Eslick GD, Jones MP, Talley NJ. Non-cardiac chest pain: prevalence, risk factors, impact and consulting–a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(9):1115–24.
Lampe FC, et al. Chest pain on questionnaire and prediction of major ischaemic heart disease events in men. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(1):63–73.
Locke 3rd GR, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted county, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(5):1448–56.
Eslick GD. Classification, natural history, epidemiology, and risk factors of noncardiac chest pain. Dis Mon. 2008;54(9):593–603.
Hochman JS, et al. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries in acute coronary syndromes IIb investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(4):226–32.
Glaser R, et al. Benefit of an early invasive management strategy in women with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2002;288(24):3124–9.
Diver DJ, et al. Clinical and arteriographic characterization of patients with unstable angina without critical coronary arterial narrowing (from the TIMI-IIIA trial). Am J Cardiol. 1994;74(6):531–7.
Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA. 2005;293(4):477–84.
Chambers J, Bass C. Chest pain with normal coronary anatomy: a review of natural history and possible etiologic factors. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1990;33(3):161–84.
Waxler EB, Kimbiris D, Dreifus LS. The fate of women with normal coronary arteriograms and chest pain resembling angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1971;28(1):25–32.
Day LJ, Sowton E. Clinical features and follow-up of patients with angina and normal coronary arteries. Lancet. 1976;2(7981):334–7.
Kaski JC, et al. Cardiac syndrome X: clinical characteristics and left ventricular function. Long-term follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(4):807–14.
Johnson BD, et al. Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation. 2004;109(24):2993–9.
Isner JM, et al. Long-term clinical course of patients with normal coronary arteriography: follow-up study of 121 patients with normal or nearly normal coronary arteriograms. Am Heart J. 1981;102(4):645–53.
Chauhan A, et al. Clinical presentation and functional prognosis in syndrome X. Br Heart J. 1993;70(4):346–51.
Halcox JP, et al. Prognostic value of coronary vascular endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2002;106(6):653–8.
Bemiller CR, Pepine CJ, Rogers AK. Long-term observations in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation. 1973;47(1):36–43.
Lavey EB, Winkle RA. Continuing disability of patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(3):191–6.
Ockene IS, et al. Unexplained chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms: a follow-up study of functional status. N Engl J Med. 1980;303(22):1249–52.
Faxon DP, et al. Therapeutic and economic value of a normal coronary angiogram. Am J Med. 1982;73(4):500–5.
Bass C, et al. Patients with angina with normal and near normal coronary arteries: clinical and psychosocial state 12 months after angiography. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;287(6404):1505–8.
Lantinga LJ, et al. One-year psychosocial follow-up of patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1988;62(4):209–13.
Beltrame J. Chest pain and normal angiography. In: Braunwald E, editor. Braunwald’s heart disease e-dition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006.
Mayou R, et al. Non-cardiac chest pain and benign palpitations in the cardiac clinic. Br Heart J. 1994;72(6):548–53.
Richter JE, Bradley LA, Castell DO. Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110(1):66–78.
Wise CM, Semble EL, Dalton CB. Musculoskeletal chest wall syndromes in patients with noncardiac chest pain: a study of 100 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(2):147–9.
White KS. Assessment and treatment of psychological causes of chest pain. Med Clin North Am. 2010;94(2):291–318.
Fruergaard P, et al. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(7):1028–34.
Husser D, et al. Evaluation of noncardiac chest pain: diagnostic approach, coping strategies and quality of life. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(1):51–5.
Bowling A. Measuring disease: a review of disease-specific quality of life measurment scales. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1995.
Reis SE, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is highly prevalent in women with chest pain in the absence of coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI WISE study. Am Heart J. 2001;141(5):735–41.
Mangieri E, et al. Slow coronary flow: clinical and histopathological features in patients with otherwise normal epicardial coronary arteries. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;37(4):375–81.
Jesuthasan L, Beltrame J, Marwick TH. Prevalence of coronary slow flow in patients undergoing coronary angiogram in a large teaching hospital. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18(3):S121.
Camici PG, et al. Coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in patients with syndrome X: response to pacing stress. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17(7):1461–70.
Grundy SM, et al. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation. 2004;109(3):433–8.
Maseri A. Syndrome X and microvascular angina. In: Maseri A, editor. Ischemic heart disease. A rational basis for clinical practice and clinical research. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 507–32.
Panting JR, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(25):1948–53.
Buchthal SD, et al. Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(12):829–35.
Cannon 3rd RO, et al. Angina caused by reduced vasodilator reserve of the small coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1(6):1359–73.
Beltrame JF, et al. The prevalence of weekly angina among patients with chronic stable angina in primary care practices: The Coronary Artery Disease in General Practice (CADENCE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(16):1491–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tavella, R., Eslick, G.D. (2013). Epidemiology of Cardiac Syndrome X and Microvascular Angina. In: Kaski, J., Eslick, G., Bairey Merz, C. (eds) Chest Pain with Normal Coronary Arteries. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4838-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4838-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4837-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4838-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)