Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Angina in Women: Epidemiology, Prognosis and Diagnosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chest Pain with Normal Coronary Arteries

  • 1170 Accesses

Abstract

Angina with normal coronary arteries/no obstructive coronary artery disease is a ­debilitating condition that affects more women than men.

Overall, 50–80 % of women evaluated for chest pain have non-obstructive disease by cardiac catheterization and the total number of women impacted is unknown.

Contrary to prior beliefs about the benign nature of angina with normal coronary arteries/no obstructive coronary artery disease, the prognosis is not benign, and there is considerably morbidity.

The heterogeneous etiologies, gender differences in pain perception, concomitant pain and co-morbidities make this condition difficult to study and manage but recently new knowledge has emerged.

When treating this condition it is recommended that these patients should be handled with great concern. The responsible doctor must initiate optimal diagnostic investigations as well as intensive recommendations of lifestyle changes and aggressive treatment of risk factors including the ones related to sex hormones like premature menopause, polycystic ovarian syndrome, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, gestational diabetes or gestational hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Statistics. Chapter 2: Cause-specific mortality and morbidity. 2012. www.who.int/whosis. Last Accessed 5 July 2012. p. 63.

  2. Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: part 1: gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:S4–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hochman JS, Tamis-Holland JE. Acute coronary syndromes: does sex matter? JAMA. 2002;288:3161–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stramba-Badiale M, Fox KM, Priori SG, et al. The European ­society of cardiology policy conference on cardiovascular diseases in women. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(8):994–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stramba-Badiale M. Women and research on cardiovascular diseases in Europe: a report from the European heart health strategy (Euro heart) project. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1677–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melloni C, Berger JS, Wang TY, Duke Clinical Research Institute, et al. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:118–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117:e25–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murabito JM, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Prognosis after the onset of coronary heart disease: an investigation of differences in outcome between the sexes according to initial coronary disease ­presentation. Circulation. 1993;88:2548–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemingway H, Langenberg C, Damant J, et al. Prevalence of angina in women versus men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of international variations across 31 countries. Circulation. 2008;117:1526–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley M, et al. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA. 2006;295(12):1404–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis KB, Chaitman B, Ryan T, et al. Comparison of 15-year survival for men and women after initial medical or surgical treatment for coronary artery disease: a CASS registry study. Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1000–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CN, et al. Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation. 2008;117:1787–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shaw LJ, Merz CN, Pepine CJ, et al. The economic burden of angina in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: results from the National Institutes of Health – National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute – sponsored women’s ischemia syndrome evaluation. Circulation. 2006;114:894–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston N, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Lagerqvist B. Are we using cardiovascular medications and coronary angiography appropriately in men and women with chest pain? Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1331–6. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsia J, Aragaki A, Bloch M, et al. Predictors of angina pectoris versus myocardial infarction from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:673–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Khalili F, Svane B, di Mario C, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in women with myocardial infarction without significant coronary lesions. Coron Artery Dis. 2000;11:579–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Khalili F, Janzsky I, Andersson A, et al. Physical activity and exercise performance predict long-term prognosis in middle-aged women surviving acute coronary syndrome. J Intern Med. 2007;261:178–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirota Y, Ohnaka H, Tsuji R, et al. Excellent prognosis of Japanese patients with chest pain and normal or nearly normal coronary arteries – 2- to 13-year follow-up of 274 patients after coronary cineangiography. Jpn Circ J. 1994;58:43–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Okraska A, Guzik T, Korpanty G, et al. Comparison of clinical status and long-term outcome of patients with angina pectoris and ­normal coronary vessels in coronary angiography or insignificantly narrowed coronary arteries. Przegl Lek. 2001;58:5–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan AK, Holdright DR, Wright CA, et al. Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ. 1994;308:883–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholz M, Wegener K, Unverdorben M, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with angina-like chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Herz. 2003;28:413–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Opherk D, Schuler G, Wetterauer K, et al. Four-year follow-up study in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms (“syndrome X”). Circulation. 1989;80:1610–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bemiller CR, Pepine CJ, Rogers AK. Long-term observations in patients with angina and normal coronary arteriograms. Circulation. 1973;47:36–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Humphries KH, Pu A, Gao M, et al. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: sex differences in outcomes. Am Heart J. 2008;155:375–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gulati M, Cooper-DeHoff RM, McClure C, et al. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation Study and the St James Women Take Heart Project. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Buchthal SD, et al. Prognosis in women with myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease: results from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation. 2004;109:2993–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hurst T, Olson TH, Olson LE, et al. Cardiac syndrome X and endothelial dysfunction: new concepts in prognosis and treatment. Am J Med. 2006;119:560–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1948–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Doyle M, Fuisz A, Kortright E, et al. The impact of myocardial flow reserve on the detection of coronary artery disease by perfusion imaging methods: an NHLBI WISE study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5:475–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reis SE, Holubkov R, Lee JS, et al. Coronary flow velocity response to adenosine characterizes coronary microvascular function in women with chest pain and no obstructive coronary disease. Results from the pilot phase of the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1469–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000;101:948–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with “normal” coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA. 2005;293:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Diamond GA. A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:574–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pepine CJ, Adams J, Marks RG, et al. Characteristics of a contemporary population with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:226–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Douglas PM, Ginsburg GS. The evaluation of chest pain in women. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1311–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Greenspan JD, Craft RM, LeResche L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Berkley KJ, Fillingim RB, Gold MS, Holdcroft A, Stefan L, Mayer EA, Mogil JS, Murphy AZ, Traub RJ, Consensus Working Group of the Sex, Gender, and Pain SIG of the IASP. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. Pain. 2007;132 Suppl 1:S26–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schenck-Gustafsson K. Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in women. Menopause Int. 2007;13:19–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liem EB, Joiner TV, Tsueda K, et al. Increased sensitivity to thermal pain and reduced subcutaneous lidocaine efficacy in redheads. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(3):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kemp Jr HG, Vokonas PS, Cohn PF, et al. The angina syndrome associated with normal coronary arteriograms. Report of a six year experience. Am J Med. 1973;54:735–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lanza GA. Cardiac syndrome X: a critical overview and future perspectives. Heart. 2007;93:159–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Melikian N, De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, et al. The pathophysiology and clinical course of the normal coronary angina syndrome (cardiac syndrome X). Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;50:294–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Al-Khalili F, Wamala SP, Orth-Gomér K, Schenck-Gustafsson K. Prognostic value of exercise testing in women after acute coronary syndromes (The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study). Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(2):211–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Khalili F, Svane B, Wamala SP, et al. Clinical importance of risk factors and exercise testing for prediction of significant coronary artery stenosis in women recovering from unstable coronary artery disease: the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Am Heart J. 2000;139(6):971–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schenck-Gustafsson K. Coronary heart disease. In: Schenck-Gustafsson K, DeCola PR, Pfaff DW, Pisetsky DS, editors. Handbook of clinical gender medicine. Basel: Karger Verlag; 2012. p. 190–2005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, et al. Exercise echocardiography or SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA. 1998;280:913–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Duwall WL. Cardiovascular disease in women. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003;70:293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mieres JH, Shaw LJ, Arai A, Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association, et al. Role of non-­invasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement. Circulation. 2005;111:682–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease: results from the what is the optimal method for ischemia evaluation in women (WOMEN) trial. Circulation. 2011;124:1239–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bairey Merz N. “The Yentl syndrome is alive and well” Editorial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1313–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kitzman DW, Scholz DG, Hagen PT, et al. Age-related changes in normal human hearts during the first 10 decades of life. Part II (maturity): a quantitative anatomic study of 765 specimens from subjects 20 to 99 years old. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;63:137–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Daly CA, Clemens F, Sendon JL, et al. Euro heart survey investigators. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:996–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kaski JC, Elliott PM. Angina pectoris and normal coronary arteriograms: clinical presentation and hemodynamic characteristics. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:35D–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lanza GA, Sestito A, Iacovella S, et al. Relation between platelet response to exercise and coronary angiographic findings in patients with effort angina. Circulation. 2003;107:1378–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wei J, Mehta PK, Johnson BD, et al. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5(6):646–53.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Crea F, Lanza GA. Angina pectoris and normal coronary arteries: cardiac syndrome X. Heart. 2004;90:457–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Cardiac Unit, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Thoracic Clinics, N3:06, Solna, Stockholm, SE 17176, Sweden

    Karin Schenck-Gustafsson MD, PhD

Authors
  1. Karin Schenck-Gustafsson MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Schenck-Gustafsson MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Medical School, Coronary Artery Disease, Research Group, St George's Hospital, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom

    Juan Carlos Kaski

  2. University of Sydney, Discipline of Surgery, The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Parker Street, Sydney, 2747, New South Wales, Australia

    Guy D. Eslick

  3. , Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, S. San Vicente Blvd 444, Los Angeles, 90048, USA

    C. Noel Bairey Merz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schenck-Gustafsson, K. (2013). Angina in Women: Epidemiology, Prognosis and Diagnosis. In: Kaski, J., Eslick, G., Bairey Merz, C. (eds) Chest Pain with Normal Coronary Arteries. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4838-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4838-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4837-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4838-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation