Abstract
With the implementation of electricity markets, the provision of transmission rights has become a natural extension. Transmission rights can be of the flowgate or financial types and have been developed to manage the risk posed by volatile congestion costs. A financial transmission right (FTR) is an instrument to hedge source-to-sink congestion and entitles its holder the right – or obligation- to collect a payment when congestion arises in the energy market. The basic definition of an FTR consists of a source and a sink node that identify the point-to-point direction of the right, a MW award that is constant for the full life term of the instrument, a time of use for which the instrument is settled and a life term which identifies the period over which the instrument is valid. Although the definition is point-to-point, FTRs are not necessarily limited to be defined between individual nodes, load zones or trading hubs are aggregated nodes widely used for FTRs.
The ideas expressed in this chapter are solely those of the author and do not represent any official position from the California ISO.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland (PJM) market offers both obligation and option types of FTRs.
- 2.
The n-1 contingency is usually the most common security constraint used in the operation of a power systems and accounts for the loss of a single generator or transmission element in the system.
- 3.
P.u. stands for per unit and is used in power systems studies to handle calculations with different voltage levels.
- 4.
Operating Transfer Capability (OTC) refers to the nominal values of transmission constraints. Once any reserved capacity is discounted, one may refer to the Available Transfer Capacibility (ATC) which is the transmission capacity that is made available to the market.
- 5.
In the California ISO markets, FTRs are named Congestion Revenue Rights (CRRs).
- 6.
Branch groups, transmission corridors or inter-tie constraints are just different types of transmission constraints used in the California ISO markets. Such elements are usually identified with acronyms or names related to the area of their physical location.
References
Alsac O, Bright JM, Brignone S (2004) The rights to fight price volatility. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2:47–57
Bautista Alderete G (2010) Competition in electricity markets: modelling and economics. Ed. VDM Verlag, Germany
CAISO (2010) Annual market performance report. Folsom, USA. www.caiso.com. Accessed December 2010
Hogan W (1992) Contract networks for electric power transmission. J Regul Econ 4:211–242
Joskow P, Tirole J (2000) Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks. RAND J Econ 31:450–487
Lesieutre BC, Hiskens A (2005) Convexity of the set of feasible injections and revenue adequacy in FTR markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:1790–1798
Lyons K, Fraser H (2000) An introduction to financial transmission rights. Electr J 13:31–37
Nocedal J, Wright S (1999) Numerical optimization, Springer series in operations research. Springer, New York
Rudkevich A, Bagnall J (2005) Loss hedging rights: a final piece in the LMP puzzle. In: 38th PHICSS, Hawai, pp 1–7
Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation, operation and control. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alderete, G.B. (2013). FTRs and Revenue Adequacy. In: Rosellón, J., Kristiansen, T. (eds) Financial Transmission Rights. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 7. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4787-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4787-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4786-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4787-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)