Skip to main content

FTRs and Revenue Adequacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Transmission Rights

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 7))

Abstract

With the implementation of electricity markets, the provision of transmission rights has become a natural extension. Transmission rights can be of the flowgate or financial types and have been developed to manage the risk posed by volatile congestion costs. A financial transmission right (FTR) is an instrument to hedge source-to-sink congestion and entitles its holder the right – or obligation- to collect a payment when congestion arises in the energy market. The basic definition of an FTR consists of a source and a sink node that identify the point-to-point direction of the right, a MW award that is constant for the full life term of the instrument, a time of use for which the instrument is settled and a life term which identifies the period over which the instrument is valid. Although the definition is point-to-point, FTRs are not necessarily limited to be defined between individual nodes, load zones or trading hubs are aggregated nodes widely used for FTRs.

The ideas expressed in this chapter are solely those of the author and do not represent any official position from the California ISO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland (PJM) market offers both obligation and option types of FTRs.

  2. 2.

    The n-1 contingency is usually the most common security constraint used in the operation of a power systems and accounts for the loss of a single generator or transmission element in the system.

  3. 3.

    P.u. stands for per unit and is used in power systems studies to handle calculations with different voltage levels.

  4. 4.

    Operating Transfer Capability (OTC) refers to the nominal values of transmission constraints. Once any reserved capacity is discounted, one may refer to the Available Transfer Capacibility (ATC) which is the transmission capacity that is made available to the market.

  5. 5.

    In the California ISO markets, FTRs are named Congestion Revenue Rights (CRRs).

  6. 6.

    Branch groups, transmission corridors or inter-tie constraints are just different types of transmission constraints used in the California ISO markets. Such elements are usually identified with acronyms or names related to the area of their physical location.

References

  • Alsac O, Bright JM, Brignone S (2004) The rights to fight price volatility. IEEE Power Energy Mag 2:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista Alderete G (2010) Competition in electricity markets: modelling and economics. Ed. VDM Verlag, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • CAISO (2010) Annual market performance report. Folsom, USA. www.caiso.com. Accessed December 2010

  • Hogan W (1992) Contract networks for electric power transmission. J Regul Econ 4:211–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joskow P, Tirole J (2000) Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks. RAND J Econ 31:450–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieutre BC, Hiskens A (2005) Convexity of the set of feasible injections and revenue adequacy in FTR markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:1790–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons K, Fraser H (2000) An introduction to financial transmission rights. Electr J 13:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocedal J, Wright S (1999) Numerical optimization, Springer series in operations research. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rudkevich A, Bagnall J (2005) Loss hedging rights: a final piece in the LMP puzzle. In: 38th PHICSS, Hawai, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation, operation and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Bautista Alderete .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alderete, G.B. (2013). FTRs and Revenue Adequacy. In: Rosellón, J., Kristiansen, T. (eds) Financial Transmission Rights. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 7. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4787-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4787-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4786-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4787-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics