Skip to main content

AGILE Interface for ‘No-Learning Nor Experience Required’ Interaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines

Abstract

The wide variety of technological devices is a barrier to satisfactory usage and learning over all. Different types of interface element distribution and dissimilarities of their functionalities, even in the same category of products under the same brand, can steepen the learning curve to effective device operation. Interface design can be understood as a mechanism for the adequacy of the technological environment to substantially improve performance, satisfaction and life of the user with special requirements. Based on an inclusive paradigm, we aim to improve the usability, accessibility and satisfiability of the interface for a specific group of users, such as novice elderly, to benefit all types of users in their daily lives. The requirements derived from a holistic analysis of user, goals and context lead to the introduction of the AGILE Interface (Assisted Guided Interaction with no Learning nor Experience required). This interface is the pillar of a new interaction style designed to assist and guide users with specific needs owing to age and non-Information and Technology experience. In the context of present-day technology interactions, the ultimate goal of this work is to move beyond out of date user stereotypes to tailor appropriate interface design adapted to realistic and specific user demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Americans with Disabilities (1990) Act of 1990 incorporating the changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  2. Aykin NM, Aykin T (1991) Individual differences in human-computer interaction. Comp Ind Eng 20(3):373–379. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(91)90009-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brusilovsky P (2001) Adaptive hypermedia. User Model User-Adap Inter 11(1):87–110, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brusilovsky P, Millán E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web, methods and strategies of web personalization. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4321. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–53

    Google Scholar 

  5. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll JM, Thomas JC (1982) Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(2):107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chisnell D (2007) Where technology meets green bananas. Interactions 14(2):10–11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1229863.1229876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jesus Stoll MT, Wickham DP et al (2005) Use of conceptual diagrams to support relationships between launchpads and its wizards. US Patent 6,968,505

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fourney DW, Carter JA (2006) A standard method of profiling the accessibility needs of computer users with vision and hearing impairments. In: Hersh MA (ed) Proceedings of conference and workshop on assistive technologies for people with vision and hearing impairments. Technology for Inclusion CVHI, Kufstein

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler M, Highsmith J (2001) The AGILE manifesto. Softw Dev 9(8):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glinert EP, York BW (1992) Computers and people with disabilities. Commun ACM 35(5):32–35, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/129875.129876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldsmith S (1976) Design for the disabled. Royal Institute of British Architects, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hanson VL (2010) Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interact Comput 22(6):502–509, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hargittai E (2010) Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociol Inquiry 80(1):92–113, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawthorn D (2000) Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interact Comput 12(5):507–528, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00021-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hewett TT (1986) The role of iterative evaluation in designing systems for usability. In: Harrison MD, Monk AF (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the British Computer Society, human computer interaction specialist group on people and computers: designing for usability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 196–214

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hix D, Hartson H (1993) Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product and process. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA (1986) Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User-centered system design. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 87–124

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hyppönen H (2001) Industry awareness and transfer in Europe and the USA. In: Roe PRW (ed) Bridging the gap? Access to telecommunications for all people. Commission of European Communities, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  20. IKEA (2012) Kitchen planner. http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/rooms_ideas/splashplanners.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2012

  21. ISO 9241-171 (2008) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 171: guidance on software accessibility. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39080. Accessed 1 April 2012

  22. ISO 9241-210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52075. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  23. Jacko JA, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access Inform Soc 1(1):56–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jette AM (2006) Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86(5):726–734

    Google Scholar 

  25. John BE, Kieras DE (1996) The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Transact Comput Hum Interact 3(4):320–351, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/235833.236054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kinsella K, He W (2009) An aging world: 2008. US census bureau, international population 1017 reports, PS95/09-1. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. Langdon P, Thimbleby H (2010) Inclusion and interaction: designing interaction for inclusive populations. Interact Comput 22(6):439–448, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Langdon P, Persad U, John Clarkson P (2010) Developing a model of cognitive interaction for analytical inclusive design evaluation. Interact Comput 22(6):510–529, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ling R (2008) Exclusion or self-isolation? Texting and the elderly users. Inform Soc 24(5)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Madden R, Hogan T (1997) The definition of disability in Australia: moving towards national consistency. AIHW, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marschollek M et al (2007) ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Inform Health Soc Care 32(4):251–261, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639230701692736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Martinez S, Sloan R, Szymkowiak A, Scott-Brown K (2010) Using virtual agents to cue observer attention: assessment of the impact of agent animation. In: The second international conference on creative content technologies. CONTENT, Lisbon, 21–26 Nov 2010, pp 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez S et al (2012) Animated virtual agents to cue user attention. Int J Adv Intell Sys 4(3&4):299–308

    Google Scholar 

  34. McDonough FA, Ladner RE, Roth W, Scadden LA and Vanderheiden GC (1988) Public law 99-506, “Section 508” Electronic equipment accessibility for disabled workers. In: O'Hare JJ (ed) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '88), ACM, New York, pp 219–222. doi:10.1145/57167.57204 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57204

  35. Moran TP (1981) Guest editor’s introduction: an applied psychology of the user. ACM Comput Surv 13:1–11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/356835.356836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mori G, Paternò F, Santoro C (2002) CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Trans Soft Eng 28(8):797–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Newell A (1993) Interfaces for the ordinary and beyond. IEEE Soft 10(5):76–78, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.232406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Newell AF (2006) Older people as a focus for inclusive design. Gerontechnology 4(4):190–199, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4017/gt.2006.04.04.003.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Newell A, Simon HA et al (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  40. Newell AF (2008) Accessible computing–past trends and future suggestions: commentary on “computers and people with disabilities.” ACM Trans Access Comput 1(2): Article 9

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nicolle C, Abascal J (2001) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2001, London, 18–20 April

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nicolle C, Peters B (1999) Elderly and disabled travelers: intelligent transp. Systems designed for the 3rd millennium. Transp Hum Fact 1(2):121–134, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sthf0102_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nielsen J (1993) Iterative user-interface design. Comp 26(11):32–41, Academic, San Diego, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.241424

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Nielsen J (1995) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pieper M, Morasch H, Piéla G (2003) Bridging the educational divide. Univ Acc Inf Soc 2(3):243–254, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0061-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Porrero IP (1998) Improving the quality of life for the European citizen: technology for inclusive design and equality. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  48. Potosnak K et al (1986) Classifying users: a hard look at some controversial issues. ACM SIGCHI Bull 17(4):84–88, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/22339.22353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pullin G, Newell AF (2007) Focussing on extra-ordinary users. In: Proceedings of HCiI 2007, coping with diversity, 4th international conference on universal access in human-computer interaction, UAHCI 2007, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007, Proceedings, part I lecture notes in computer science, vol 4554, Springer, ISBN:978 3 540 73278-5

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rensink RA et al (2010) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psych Sci 8(5):368–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rogers Y, Sharp H, Preece J (2011) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  52. Savidis A, Stephanidis C (2004) Unified user interface design: designing universally accessible interactions. Interact Comp 16(2): 243–270. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0953543804000025. Accessed 18 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  53. Scott-Brown KC, Baker MR, Orbach HS (2000) Comparison blindness. Vis Cogn 7(1–3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shneiderman B (1983) Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Comp 16(8):57–69, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.1983.1654471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2005) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sloan RJS (2011) Emotional avatars: choreographing emotional facial expression animation. Dissertation, University of Abertay, Dundee

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sloan RJS, Martinez S, Scott-Brown K (2012) Using the principles of animation to predict allocation of attention. In: Predicting Perceptions 2012, Edinburgh, 17–19 April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  58. SensoMotric Instruments (2012) Eye & Gaze Tracking Systems. http://www.smivision.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012

  59. SensoMotric Instruments (2012) SMI Eye Tracking Glasses. http://eyetracking-glasses.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012

  60. Stevens JC (1992) Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol 47(1):35–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Stevens JC et al (1998) A multimodal assessment of sensory thresholds in aging. J Gerontol 53(4):263

    Google Scholar 

  62. Swiffin AL, Pickering JA, Arnott JL, Newell AF (1985) Pal: an effort efficient portable communication aid and keyboard emulator. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on rehabilitation techonology, RESNA 8th Annual Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, pp 197–199

    Google Scholar 

  63. United States Department of Education Questions & Answers Title IV–Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 section 508. Electronic and information technology. http://www.justice.gov/crt/508/archive/deptofed.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  64. Van Dam A (1997) Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun ACM 40(2):63–67, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/253671.253708

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  65. Whiteside J, Bennett J, Holzblatt K (1988) Usability engineering: our experience and evolution. In: Helander M (ed) Handbook of human-computer interaction. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 791–817

    Google Scholar 

  66. WHO (2001) ICF international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zajicek M (2006) Aspects of HCI research for older people. Univ Acc Inf Soc 5(3):279–286, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0046-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ziegler J (1996) Interactive techniques. ACM Comput Surv 28(1):185–187. doi:10.1145/234313.234392 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/234313.234392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Martinez is grateful for support from the Alison Armstrong Studentship at Abertay University. We are grateful to Sensomotric Instruments (Teltow, Germany) SMI [58] for assistance with the use of eye-tracking equipment (especially to Stefanie Gehrke and Jose Barreiros); also, for extensive training received by Richard Lilley from Tracksys Ltd. (Nottingham, UK). Special thanks to María Ángeles López at the Centro de Salud Nueva Málaga (Málaga, SPAIN) and to Purificación Roldán at the Educación Permanente SEPER (Málaga, SPAIN) for their effective collaboration in the elderly user testing. Besides, thank to Dr Paula Forbes and all the members of the User Centre Group of the University of Dundee (Dundee, UK), who were a profound motivation for the development of this work. This research has been inspired by the European Project FP7 iAGE, in which authors from Abertay University contribute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Martinez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martinez, S., Carrillo, A.L., Scott-Brown, K.C., Falgueras, J. (2013). AGILE Interface for ‘No-Learning Nor Experience Required’ Interaction. In: Martín, E., Haya, P., Carro, R. (eds) User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4777-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4778-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics