Abstract
The wide variety of technological devices is a barrier to satisfactory usage and learning over all. Different types of interface element distribution and dissimilarities of their functionalities, even in the same category of products under the same brand, can steepen the learning curve to effective device operation. Interface design can be understood as a mechanism for the adequacy of the technological environment to substantially improve performance, satisfaction and life of the user with special requirements. Based on an inclusive paradigm, we aim to improve the usability, accessibility and satisfiability of the interface for a specific group of users, such as novice elderly, to benefit all types of users in their daily lives. The requirements derived from a holistic analysis of user, goals and context lead to the introduction of the AGILE Interface (Assisted Guided Interaction with no Learning nor Experience required). This interface is the pillar of a new interaction style designed to assist and guide users with specific needs owing to age and non-Information and Technology experience. In the context of present-day technology interactions, the ultimate goal of this work is to move beyond out of date user stereotypes to tailor appropriate interface design adapted to realistic and specific user demands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Americans with Disabilities (1990) Act of 1990 incorporating the changes made by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
Aykin NM, Aykin T (1991) Individual differences in human-computer interaction. Comp Ind Eng 20(3):373–379. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(91)90009-U
Brusilovsky P (2001) Adaptive hypermedia. User Model User-Adap Inter 11(1):87–110, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306
Brusilovsky P, Millán E (2007) User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web, methods and strategies of web personalization. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4321. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–53
Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. CRC, Boca Raton
Carroll JM, Thomas JC (1982) Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(2):107–116
Chisnell D (2007) Where technology meets green bananas. Interactions 14(2):10–11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1229863.1229876
de Jesus Stoll MT, Wickham DP et al (2005) Use of conceptual diagrams to support relationships between launchpads and its wizards. US Patent 6,968,505
Fourney DW, Carter JA (2006) A standard method of profiling the accessibility needs of computer users with vision and hearing impairments. In: Hersh MA (ed) Proceedings of conference and workshop on assistive technologies for people with vision and hearing impairments. Technology for Inclusion CVHI, Kufstein
Fowler M, Highsmith J (2001) The AGILE manifesto. Softw Dev 9(8):28–35
Glinert EP, York BW (1992) Computers and people with disabilities. Commun ACM 35(5):32–35, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/129875.129876
Goldsmith S (1976) Design for the disabled. Royal Institute of British Architects, London
Hanson VL (2010) Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interact Comput 22(6):502–509, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.09.001
Hargittai E (2010) Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociol Inquiry 80(1):92–113, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
Hawthorn D (2000) Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interact Comput 12(5):507–528, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(99)00021-1
Hewett TT (1986) The role of iterative evaluation in designing systems for usability. In: Harrison MD, Monk AF (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the British Computer Society, human computer interaction specialist group on people and computers: designing for usability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 196–214
Hix D, Hartson H (1993) Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product and process. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Hutchins EL, Hollan JD, Norman DA (1986) Direct manipulation interfaces. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User-centered system design. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 87–124
Hyppönen H (2001) Industry awareness and transfer in Europe and the USA. In: Roe PRW (ed) Bridging the gap? Access to telecommunications for all people. Commission of European Communities, Brussels
IKEA (2012) Kitchen planner. http://www.ikea.com/ms/en_US/rooms_ideas/splashplanners.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
ISO 9241-171 (2008) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 171: guidance on software accessibility. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39080. Accessed 1 April 2012
ISO 9241-210 (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52075. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
Jacko JA, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access Inform Soc 1(1):56–76
Jette AM (2006) Toward a common language for function, disability, and health. Phys Ther 86(5):726–734
John BE, Kieras DE (1996) The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM Transact Comput Hum Interact 3(4):320–351, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/235833.236054
Kinsella K, He W (2009) An aging world: 2008. US census bureau, international population 1017 reports, PS95/09-1. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC
Langdon P, Thimbleby H (2010) Inclusion and interaction: designing interaction for inclusive populations. Interact Comput 22(6):439–448, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.007
Langdon P, Persad U, John Clarkson P (2010) Developing a model of cognitive interaction for analytical inclusive design evaluation. Interact Comput 22(6):510–529, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.08.008
Ling R (2008) Exclusion or self-isolation? Texting and the elderly users. Inform Soc 24(5)
Madden R, Hogan T (1997) The definition of disability in Australia: moving towards national consistency. AIHW, Canberra
Marschollek M et al (2007) ICT-based health information services for elderly people: past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Inform Health Soc Care 32(4):251–261, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639230701692736
Martinez S, Sloan R, Szymkowiak A, Scott-Brown K (2010) Using virtual agents to cue observer attention: assessment of the impact of agent animation. In: The second international conference on creative content technologies. CONTENT, Lisbon, 21–26 Nov 2010, pp 7–12
Martinez S et al (2012) Animated virtual agents to cue user attention. Int J Adv Intell Sys 4(3&4):299–308
McDonough FA, Ladner RE, Roth W, Scadden LA and Vanderheiden GC (1988) Public law 99-506, “Section 508” Electronic equipment accessibility for disabled workers. In: O'Hare JJ (ed) Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI '88), ACM, New York, pp 219–222. doi:10.1145/57167.57204 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57204
Moran TP (1981) Guest editor’s introduction: an applied psychology of the user. ACM Comput Surv 13:1–11, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/356835.356836
Mori G, Paternò F, Santoro C (2002) CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design. IEEE Trans Soft Eng 28(8):797–813
Newell A (1993) Interfaces for the ordinary and beyond. IEEE Soft 10(5):76–78, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.232406
Newell AF (2006) Older people as a focus for inclusive design. Gerontechnology 4(4):190–199, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4017/gt.2006.04.04.003.00
Newell A, Simon HA et al (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Newell AF (2008) Accessible computing–past trends and future suggestions: commentary on “computers and people with disabilities.” ACM Trans Access Comput 1(2): Article 9
Nicolle C, Abascal J (2001) Inclusive design guidelines for HCI. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2001, London, 18–20 April
Nicolle C, Peters B (1999) Elderly and disabled travelers: intelligent transp. Systems designed for the 3rd millennium. Transp Hum Fact 1(2):121–134, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sthf0102_1
Nielsen J (1993) Iterative user-interface design. Comp 26(11):32–41, Academic, San Diego, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.241424
Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego
Nielsen J (1995) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington
Pieper M, Morasch H, Piéla G (2003) Bridging the educational divide. Univ Acc Inf Soc 2(3):243–254, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0061-y
Porrero IP (1998) Improving the quality of life for the European citizen: technology for inclusive design and equality. IOS Press, Amsterdam
Potosnak K et al (1986) Classifying users: a hard look at some controversial issues. ACM SIGCHI Bull 17(4):84–88, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/22339.22353
Pullin G, Newell AF (2007) Focussing on extra-ordinary users. In: Proceedings of HCiI 2007, coping with diversity, 4th international conference on universal access in human-computer interaction, UAHCI 2007, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007, Proceedings, part I lecture notes in computer science, vol 4554, Springer, ISBN:978 3 540 73278-5
Rensink RA et al (2010) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psych Sci 8(5):368–373
Rogers Y, Sharp H, Preece J (2011) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New Jersey
Savidis A, Stephanidis C (2004) Unified user interface design: designing universally accessible interactions. Interact Comp 16(2): 243–270. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0953543804000025. Accessed 18 Nov 2011
Scott-Brown KC, Baker MR, Orbach HS (2000) Comparison blindness. Vis Cogn 7(1–3):253–267
Shneiderman B (1983) Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. IEEE Comp 16(8):57–69, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MC.1983.1654471
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C (2005) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Sloan RJS (2011) Emotional avatars: choreographing emotional facial expression animation. Dissertation, University of Abertay, Dundee
Sloan RJS, Martinez S, Scott-Brown K (2012) Using the principles of animation to predict allocation of attention. In: Predicting Perceptions 2012, Edinburgh, 17–19 April 2012
SensoMotric Instruments (2012) Eye & Gaze Tracking Systems. http://www.smivision.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
SensoMotric Instruments (2012) SMI Eye Tracking Glasses. http://eyetracking-glasses.com/. Accessed 16 Dec 2012
Stevens JC (1992) Aging and spatial acuity of touch. J Gerontol 47(1):35–40
Stevens JC et al (1998) A multimodal assessment of sensory thresholds in aging. J Gerontol 53(4):263
Swiffin AL, Pickering JA, Arnott JL, Newell AF (1985) Pal: an effort efficient portable communication aid and keyboard emulator. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on rehabilitation techonology, RESNA 8th Annual Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, pp 197–199
United States Department of Education Questions & Answers Title IV–Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998 section 508. Electronic and information technology. http://www.justice.gov/crt/508/archive/deptofed.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011
Van Dam A (1997) Post-WIMP user interfaces. Commun ACM 40(2):63–67, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/253671.253708
Whiteside J, Bennett J, Holzblatt K (1988) Usability engineering: our experience and evolution. In: Helander M (ed) Handbook of human-computer interaction. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 791–817
WHO (2001) ICF international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva
Zajicek M (2006) Aspects of HCI research for older people. Univ Acc Inf Soc 5(3):279–286, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0046-8
Ziegler J (1996) Interactive techniques. ACM Comput Surv 28(1):185–187. doi:10.1145/234313.234392 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/234313.234392
Acknowledgments
Martinez is grateful for support from the Alison Armstrong Studentship at Abertay University. We are grateful to Sensomotric Instruments (Teltow, Germany) SMI [58] for assistance with the use of eye-tracking equipment (especially to Stefanie Gehrke and Jose Barreiros); also, for extensive training received by Richard Lilley from Tracksys Ltd. (Nottingham, UK). Special thanks to María Ángeles López at the Centro de Salud Nueva Málaga (Málaga, SPAIN) and to Purificación Roldán at the Educación Permanente SEPER (Málaga, SPAIN) for their effective collaboration in the elderly user testing. Besides, thank to Dr Paula Forbes and all the members of the User Centre Group of the University of Dundee (Dundee, UK), who were a profound motivation for the development of this work. This research has been inspired by the European Project FP7 iAGE, in which authors from Abertay University contribute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martinez, S., Carrillo, A.L., Scott-Brown, K.C., Falgueras, J. (2013). AGILE Interface for ‘No-Learning Nor Experience Required’ Interaction. In: Martín, E., Haya, P., Carro, R. (eds) User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4777-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4778-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)