Skip to main content

Diagnostic and Accessibility Based User Modelling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines

Abstract

This chapter discusses application driven user modelling by dividing user model applications into two broad categories: to provide access for the user with a device and to derive conclusions about the user. Both imply different requirements and different algorithms. The chapter starts by reviewing user modelling literature. Next, the chapter focuses on a discussion of design work in providing accessible documents to deliver accessible educational materials to students, matched to their needs and the capabilities of the device that they are using, so modelling components need to be considered. Next is a presentation of user models supporting the diagnosis of cognitive states, employing a user model that is expressed as fusion of sensor data. With a baseline created, the system captures sensor data over time and compares it with ‘normal’ pattern, to identify indications of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Finally, a novel framework for User Models design is shown, dividing user data into static and dynamic types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.aegis-project.eu

  2. 2.

    http://adenu.ia.uned.es/alpe/index.tcl

  3. 3.

    http://www.eu4all-project.eu/

References

  1. Abowd G, Mynatt E (2004) Designing for the human experience in smart environments. In: Cook D, Das S (eds) Smart environments: technology, protocols, and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aztiria A, Izaguirre A, Basagoiti R, Augusto JC (2009) Learning about preferences and common behaviours of the user in an intelligent environment. In: Gottfried B, Aghajan H (eds) Behaviour monitoring and interpretation. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aztiria A, Izaguirre A, Basagoiti R, Augusto JC, Cook DJ (2010) Automatic modeling of frequent user behaviours in intelligent environments. In: sixth international conference on intelligent environments (IE), Kuala-Lumpur, Malaysia, 19–21 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carmien S (2007) Leveraging skills into independent living-distributed cognition and cognitive disability. VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e.K, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Codd EF (1990) The relational model for database management, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doctor F, Hagras H, Callaghan V (2005) A fuzzy embedded agent-based approach for realizing ambient intelligence in intelligent inhabited environments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 35(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. EU4ALL (European Unified Approch for Assisted Longlife Learning) (2007) Overview. http://www.eu4all-project.eu. Accessed 16 July 2012

  10. Farrahi KD, Gatica-Perez D (2008) Discovering human routines from cell phone data with topic models. In: Proceedings of the 2008 12th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC ’08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fink J, Kobsa A (2000) A review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the World Wide Web. User Model User-Adapt Interact 10:209–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer G (2001) User modeling in human-computer interaction. User Model User-Adapt Interact 11(1):65–86

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamid R, Johnson A, Batta S, Bobick A, Isbell C, Coleman G (2005) Detection and explanation of anomalous activities: representing activities as bags of event n-grams. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’05), vol 1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 1031–1038

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hamid R, Maddi S, Bobick A, Essa I (2007) Structure from statistics – unsupervised activity analysis using suffix trees. In: Proceedings of IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision, ICCV 2007, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 14–20 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helal S, Mann W, El-Zabadani H, King J, Kaddoura Y, Jansen E (2005) The Gator Tech smart house: a programmable pervasive space. IEEE Comput 38(3):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority), RFC 2045-RFC 2046 (1996) in Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions IANA. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt?number=2045 Accessed Mar 2012

  17. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2007) IMS learner information package accessibility for LIP information model version 1.0 final specification. http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/acclipv1p0/imsacclip_infov1p0.html

  18. INCTS. V2 – Information Technology Access Interfaces (2007) http://www.ncits.org/tc_home/v2.htm

  19. Jones KS (1989) Realism about user modeling. In: Kobsa A, Wahlster W (eds) User modeling in dialog systems. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  20. Keates S, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (2001) User models and user physical capability. User Model User-Adapt Interact 12:139–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knops H, Bühler C (1999) Assistive technology on the threshold of the new millennium. IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kobsa A (1995) Special issue on user modeling shell systems. User Model User-Adapt Interact 4(2):ii–v

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kobsa A (2001) Generic user modeling systems. User Model User-Adapt Interact 11:49–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kobsa A (2007) Generic user modeling systems. In: Brusilovsky P, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kobsa A, Wahlster W (eds) (1989) User models in dialog systems. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. KONNEX. KONNEX (KNX) Association. http://www.knx.org Accessed Mar 2012

  27. Langley P (1999) User modeling in adaptive interfaces. In: Kay J (ed) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on user modeling (UM ’99). Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lassila O, Swick RR (1999) Resource description framework (RDF), model and syntax specification, W3C Recommendation 22 February 1999. World Wide Web Consortium. 1999 15 May 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/

  29. Manning C, Schütze H (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Martínez A, Etxeberria I, Aldaz E, Roedl L, Hochgatterer A, Wöckl B, Bund J (2011) Supporting diagnostic decision for early detection of a neurodegenerative disease on a behavioural altered pattern basis. In: IADIS multi conference on computer science and information systems (e-Health Conference)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McKeown KR (1990) User modeling and user interfaces. In: Eighth national conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1138–1139

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moore D, Essa I (2002) Multitasked activities using stochastic context-free grammar, using video. In: Dechter R, Kearns M, Sutton R (eds) Eighteenth national conference on artificial intelligence, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mozer MC (2004) Lessons from an adaptive home. In: Cook D, Das S (eds) Smart environments: technology, protocols, and applications. Wiley, New York City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  34. Oliver N, Horvitz E, Garg A (2002) Layered representations for human activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on multimodal interfaces (ICMI ’02). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  35. Open Mobile Alliance (2007) OMA Technical Section Profile Data (UAProf). http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/profiles/index.html

  36. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, Franssen EH, Shulman E, Monteiro I, Sclan SG, Steinberg G, Kluger A, Torossian C, de Leon MJ, Laska E (1996) Mortality and temporal course of probable Alzheimer’s disease: a 5-year prospective study. Int Psychogeriatr 2:291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Salton G (1971) The SMART retrieval system – experiment in automatic document processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  38. Singla G, Cook D, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2009) Tracking activities in complex settings using smart environment technologies. Int J BioSci Psychiatry Technol 1(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  39. Singla G, Cook D, Schmitter-Edgecombe M (2008) Incorporating temporal reasoning into activity recognition for Smart Home Residents. In: AAAI workshop on spatial and temporal reasoning, pp 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  40. Starner T, Pentland A, Weaver J (1998) Real-time American sign language recognition using desk and wearable computer based video. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(12):1371–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stauffer C, Grimson W (2000) Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Steinhoff U, Schiele B (2009) An exploration of daily routine modeling based on bluetooth, GSM-Data. In: International symposium on wearable computers, pp 141–142

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sullivan J (2004) Mobility for all project. http://www.cs.colorado.edu/∼l3d/clever/projects/mobility.html

  44. trace.wisc.edu (2005) V2 support project at trace – toward a universal remote console standard. http://trace.wisc.edu/urc/

  45. URC Consortium. The Universal Remote Console Consortium (2007) http://myurc.org/

  46. Velasco CA, Mohamad Y, Carmien S (2007) Universally accessible lifelong learning by user and device profiling adaptation. In: Workshop of towards user modelling and adaptive systems for all, international conference on user modeling (UM), Corfu

    Google Scholar 

  47. Velasco CA, Mohamad Y (2002) Web services and user/device profiling for accessible internet services provision. In: CSUN’s seventeenth annual international conference technology and persons with disabilities, Los Angeles, USA, 18–23 Mar 2002

    Google Scholar 

  48. Velasco A, Mohamad Y, Gilman S, Viorres N, Vlachogiannis E, Arnellos A, Darzentas S (2004) Universal access to information services – the need for user information and its relationship to device profiles. Universal Access Info Soc 3(1):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. W3C. Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 2.0 (2007) http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab2-20070430/

  50. W3C. The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2007) http://www.w3.org/

  51. W3C. WAI-ARIA Overview (2009) http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/aria

  52. Wireless Application Protocol Forum, L. WAG UAProf (2001) http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/affiliates/wap/wap-248-uaprof-20011020-a.pdf

  53. Youngblood GM, Cook D (2007) Data mining for hierarchical model creation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 37(4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhong H, Shi J, Visontai M (2004) Detecting unusual activity in video. In: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’04). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank their colleagues for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this paper and for contributing to this paper in various ways. Stefan Carmien wishes to thank Carlos Velasco, Andy Heath, and Chris Powers and the EU4ALL project which provided the inspiration for Sect. 3.3. Alberto Martínez wishes to thank all the members of the BEDMOND Project Team, the ones close to end-users for their efficient work done while specifying requirements, the researchers highly involved in the Ambient Assisted Living environment and technologies to apply and, finally, the market oriented companies of the consortium guiding our development for the project results impact. This project is sponsored and partially funded by the European AAL JP and the National Funding Agencies from Austria (FFG), Portugal and Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan P. Carmien .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carmien, S.P., Cantera, A.M. (2013). Diagnostic and Accessibility Based User Modelling. In: Martín, E., Haya, P., Carro, R. (eds) User Modeling and Adaptation for Daily Routines. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4778-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4777-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4778-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics