Abstract
The growth of new clinical knowledge continues to challenge how surgery is practiced, and several types of literature reviews attempt to consolidate this expansion of information. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are common methodologies that integrate findings on the same subject collected from different studies. Unlike a systematic review, a meta-analysis arrives at a conclusion backed by quantitative analysis. This review provides an overview of the principles, application, and limitations of these methods, which is fundamental to interpreting and critiquing their results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res. 1976;5:3–8.
The Cochrane Collaboration Web site. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
Kelly GA. Meta-analysis: an introduction. Available at: http://www.pitt.edu/~super1/lecture/lec3221/index.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
Wolf FM. Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/k30/Meta-analysis/Meta-analysis%20clinical%20research%200603_files/frame.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2013.
Egger M, Smith GD. Potentials and promise. BMJ. 1997;315:1371–4.
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD001546.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer – an overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1444–55. [Erratum, N Engl J Med 1996;334:1003.]
Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ. 1997;315:1533–7.
Meade MO. Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review. Ann Int Med. 1997;127:531–7.
Counsell C. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Int Med. 1997;127:380–7.
Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352(9128):609–13.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.
http://tech.cochrane.org/Revman. Accessed 21 Apr 2014.
Edwards JP, Ho AL, Tee MC, Dixon E, Ball CG. Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):53–9.
Antoniou GA, Chalmers N, Kanesalingham K, Antoniou SA, Schiro A, Serracino-Inglott F, Smyth JV, Murray D. Meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease with drug-eluting stents. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(2):131–44.
Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316:61–6.
LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:536–42.
Bailar III JC. The practice of meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:149–57.
Bailar JC. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:559.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
Cina CS, Abouzahr L, Arena GO, Lagana A, Devereaux PJ, Farrokhyar F. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage to prevent paraplegia during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(1):36–44.
Effron B, Morris G. Stein’s paradox in statistics. Sci Am. 1977;236:119–227.
Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):450–9.
Davey Smith G, Egger M. Meta-analysis. Unresolved issues and future developments. BMJ. 1998;316(7126):221–5.
Landmark References
Bailar JC. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:559.
Counsell C. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Ann Int Med. 1997;127:380–7.
Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ. 1998;316:61–6.
Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ. 1997;315:1533–7.
Meade MO. Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review. Ann Int Med. 1997;127:531–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibbons, M.A. (2014). Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: A Clinical Exercise. In: Dimick, J., Greenberg, C. (eds) Success in Academic Surgery: Health Services Research. Success in Academic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4718-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4718-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4717-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4718-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)