Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSMANUFACT))

  • 1820 Accesses

Abstract

When solving large finite element problems, solution time becomes a factor which cannot be ignored. It is among the concerns when considering modeling in three dimensions instead of two dimensions. Different approaches are available to reduce the computational cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El-Sayed MEM, Hsiung C-K (1990) Parallel finite element computation with separate substructures. Comput Struct 36(2):261–265

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farhat C (1988) A simple and efficient automatic fem domain decomposer. Comput Struct 28(5):579–602

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Nasra M, Nguyen DT (1992) An algorithm for domain decomposition in finite element analysis. Comput Struct 39(3/4):277–289

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lanczos C (1952) Solution of systems of linear equations by minimized iterations. J Res Nat Bur Stand 49(1):33–53

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J Res Nat Bur Stand 49(6):409–436

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meijerink JA, van der Vorst HA (1977) An iterative solution method for linear systems of which the coefficient matrix is a symmetric m-matrix. Math Comput 31(137):148–162

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farhat C, Wilson E (1987) A parallel active column equation solver. Comput Struct 28(2):289–304

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen CV, Martins PAF (2013) Parallel skyline solver: implementation for shared memory on standard personal computers. Submitted for publication in International Journal

    Google Scholar 

  9. Synn SY, Fulton RE (1995) The performance prediction of a parallel skyline solver and its implementation for large scale structure analysis. Comput Syst Eng 6(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandes JLM, Martins PAF (2009) Robust and effective numerical strategies for the simulation of metal forming processes. J Manuf Technol Res 1(1/2):21–36

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amdahl GM (1967) Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences, pp 483–485

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. A. F. Martins .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, C.V., Zhang, W., Alves, L.M., Bay, N., Martins, P.A.F. (2013). Parallelization of Equation Solvers . In: Modeling of Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Manufacturing Processes. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4643-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4643-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4642-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4643-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics