Research on the Evaluation of Business Ecosystem Health

  • Xiaoping Li
  • Xiaowen Jie
  • Qiang Li
  • Qi Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 185)


By analyzing the connotation and measurement scale of business ecosystem health on the basis of Ecological theory, Complex Systems theory, Complex Adaptive theory and Business Ecosystem theory, this paper analyzes the basic attributes of business ecosystem from five aspects: ecological attributes, structure attributes, functional attributes, operation mechanism attributes and lifecycle attributes. According to the mechanism of promoting system health, the paper constructs 5 level 2 indexes corresponding to 28 level 3 indexes. Based on the Evaluation model, using the Analytic Hierachy Process (AHP) and the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method, the paper evaluates Information Technology Business Ecosystem Health in China.


Business ecosystem Health Information technology business ecosystem AHP 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lanssiti M, Levien R (2004) The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for Mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. 1st edn, Harvard Business Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hu B, Zhang JR, Shao RJ (2006) Connotation and evaluation index system of the enterprise ecosystem health. Science and Technology Management Research 1:59–61.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu B (2008) Enterprise ecosystem health evaluation based on the fuzzy-grey theory. Industrial Technology & Economy 5:58–61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang WH (2007) A study on evaluation method of Business ecosystem health. Modernization of Management 5:40–42.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li D (2008) Classification research of business ecosystem founding on its evolution features —The clustering analyses of 33 typical core corporations’ ecosystem practices. China Industrial Economics 11:119–129.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spiegel JM, Bonet M, Yassi A et al. (2001) Developing ecosystem health indicators in centro habana: A community-based approach. Ecosystem Haelth 7:15–26.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitleton-Kelly E (2003) Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. Mitletonkelly complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organizations: The application of complexity theory to organization. Amstern: Elsevier/Pergamon 23–50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhong GS, Cui ZZ (2009) Theory and its development direction of the business ecosystem. Dongyue Tribune 6:27–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haken H (1983) Synergetics an introduction: Non-equilibrium phase transitions and selforganization in physics, chemistry and biology. 3th edn, Springer-Verlag,London.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prigogine I, Nicolis G (1977) Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. 1st edn, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan YJ, Deng HZ (2001) The study of complex adaptive system theory and it’s application. Systems Engineering 5:1–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li ZJ, Yan AM, Xu XF (2008) Research on complexity and adaptation of business ecosystem. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering 3:124–128.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan YJ (2001) Research on complex adaptive system and application of business ecosystem. System Engineering 5:1–6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haken H (1980) Synergetics. Naturwissenschaften 67:121–128.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Public HealthSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations