Skip to main content

Controller Auto-Tuning Based on Control Performance Monitoring

  • Chapter
Book cover Control Performance Management in Industrial Automation

Part of the book series: Advances in Industrial Control ((AIC))

Abstract

In practice, it is the norm to perform controller tuning only at the commissioning stage and never again. A control loop that worked well at one time is prone to degradation over time unless regular maintenance is undertaken. Typically, 30 % of industrial loops have poor tuning, and 85 % of loops have sub-optimal tuning. There are many reasons for the degradation of control loop performance, including changes in disturbance characteristics, interaction with other loops, changes in production characteristics (e.g. plant throughput, product grade), etc. Also, many loops are still “tuned by feel” without considering appropriate tuning methods—a practice often leading to very strange controller behaviour. This chapter presents new tuning methods that treat controller tuning in the context of control performance monitoring and thus substantially extend the traditional field of controller auto-tuning. This means that control performance measures are continuously monitored on a regular basis, i.e. during normal operation, and performance statistics used to schedule loop retuning and automatically determine the optimal controller parameters. It starts with recalling the basic concepts of PID auto-tuning and adaptation as well as a classification of CPM-based controller re-tuning methods. Techniques that deliver optimal controller parameters by solving an optimisation problem are then described. Subsequently new re-tuning methods are presented, which simultaneously provide the assessment of the controller performance and finding the optimal controller settings in an iterative way on the closed loop. Simulation studies are presented to compare the different techniques and make suggestions for using them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The used function for Kohonen feature maps has been implemented by Norbert Link.

References

  • Agrawal P, Lakshminarayanan S (2003) Tuning proportional-integral-derivative controllers using achievable performance indices. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:5576–5582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åström KJ (1979) Introduction to stochastic control. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Åström KJ, Hägglund T (1988) Automatic tuning of PID controllers. ISA, Research Triangle Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Åström KJ, Hägglund T (2006) Advanced PID control. ISA, Research Triangle Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender M (2003) Auswahl, Implementierung und Test von Algorithmen zur Bewertung der Güte von Reglern. Diploma Thesis, BFI/University of Cologne, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckbee G (2008) The 6 most common PID configuration errors: how to find and fix them. www.expertune.com/articles/WPPIDConfigErrors.pdf

  • Desborough L, Miller R (2002) Increasing customer value of industrial control performance monitoring—Honeywell’s experience. AIChE Symp Ser 98(326):153–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson P, Isaksson AJ (1994) Some aspects of control loop performance monitoring. In: Proc IEEE confer control applications, Glasgow, Scotland, pp 1029–1034

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goradia DB, Lakshminarayanan S, Rangaiah GP (2005) Attainment of PI achievable performance for linear SISO process with deadtime by iterative tuning. Can J Chem Eng 83:723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimble MJ (2000) Restricted-structure LQG optimal control for continuous-time systems. IEE Proc Part D, Control Theory Appl 147:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimble MJ (2002a) Controller performance benchmarking and tuning using generalised minimum variance control. Automatica 38:2111–2119

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Grimble MJ (2002b) Restricted structure controller tuning and performance assessment. IEE Proc Part D, Control Theory Appl 149:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägglund T (1995) A control-loop performance monitor. Control Eng Pract 3:1543–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägglund T, Åström KJ (2000) Supervision of adaptive control algorithms. Automatica 36:1171–1180

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson H, Gevers M, Gunnarsson S, Lequin O (1998) Iterative feedback tuning. IEEE Control Syst 18:26–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton EC, Foley MW, Kwok KE (2003) Performance assessment of level controllers. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 17:663–684

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Howard R, Cooper DJ (2008) Performance assessment of non-self-regulating controllers in a cogeneration power plant. Appl Energy 86:212–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard R, Cooper DJ (2010) A novel pattern-based approach for diagnostic controller performance monitoring. Control Eng Pract 18:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B (2003) A pragmatic approach towards assessment of control loop performance. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process 17:489–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugo AJ (2006) Performance assessment of single-loop industrial controllers. J Process Control 16:785–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingimundarson A, Hägglund T (2005) Closed-loop performance monitoring using loop tuning. J Process Control 15:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Lakshminarayanan S (2005) A filter-based approach for performance assessment and enhancement of SISO control systems. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:8260–8276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelali M (2007a) Automatisches Reglertuning basierend auf Methoden des Control Performance Monitoring. Automatisierungstechnik 55:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavuri SN, Venkatasubramanian V (1994) Neural network decomposition strategies for large-scale fault diagnosis. Int J Control 59:767–792

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ko B-S, Edgar TF (1998) Assessment of achievable PI control performance for linear processes with dead time. In: Proc Amer control confer, Philadelphia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko B-S, Edgar TF (2004) PID control performance assessment: the single-loop case. AIChE J 50:1211–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozub DJ (1996) Controller performance monitoring and diagnosis: experiences and challenges. In: Proc chemical process control confer, Lake Tahoe, USA, pp 83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy PR, Mary Chan BE, Rangaiah GP (1987) Closed-loop tuning of process control systems. Chem Eng Sci 42:2173–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leva A, Cox C, Ruano A (2001) Hands-on PID autotuning: a guide to better utilisation. IFAC Professional Brief. www.ifac-control.org

  • O’Dwyer A (2003) Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ordys AW, Uduehi D, Johnson MA (eds) (2007) Process control performance assessment: from theory to implementation. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Qin SJ (1998) Control performance monitoring—a review and assessment. Comput Chem Eng 23:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengaswany R, Venkatasubramanian V (1995) A syntactic pattern-recognition approach for process monitoring and fault diagnosis. Eng Appl Artif lntell 8:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA (2004) Process dynamics and control. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uduehi D, Ordys A, Grimble MJ, Majecki P, Xia H (2007b) Controller benchmarking procedures—model-based methods. In: Ordys AW, Uduehi D, Johnson MA (eds) Process control performance assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatasubramanian V, Vaidyanathan R, Yamamoto Y (1990) Process fault detection and diagnosis using neural networks—I. Steady-state processes. Comput Chem Eng 14:699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visioli A (2005) Assessment of tuning of PI controllers for self-regulating processes. In: Proc IFAC world congress, 2005, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuwana M, Seborg DE (1982) A new method for online controller tuning. AIChE J 28:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jelali, M. (2013). Controller Auto-Tuning Based on Control Performance Monitoring. In: Control Performance Management in Industrial Automation. Advances in Industrial Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4546-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4545-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4546-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics