Advertisement

Quality Assurance and Consumer Electronics Recycling

  • Robert SroufeEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.1k Downloads

Abstract

The information within this chapter examines the characteristics of consumer electronic recycling systems to show how quality assurance has evolved to meet the current needs of reverse logistics demanufacturers. A review of the literature reveals several trends regarding the amount of e-waste, recycling programs, the influence of international regulations, a focus on large-scale operations, and emerging recycling certifications. Given the dynamic context of consumer electronics recycling systems and opportunities for new competitive capabilities, information within this chapter provides exploratory field study insight from a small US recycling firm. A primary contribution of this chapter is found in filling a gap in the literature to advance our understanding how small firms are overcoming emerging challenges and taking advantage of opportunities facing them within reverse supply chains focusing on recycling of consumer electronics and information technology assets. The field study sheds new light on quality assurance through emerging standards, contemporary opportunities for emerging business models within the industry, and implications for the future of reverse logistics practices and research.

Keywords

Supply Chain Reverse Logistics Consumer Electronic Environmental Management System Supply Chain Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

A special thanks to Preeti Srivastav, a MBA+Sustainability Fellow, for her research and help with this chapter and related projects.

References

  1. 1.
    Basel Action Network (BAN) (2011). http://www.ban.org/main/about_BAN.html
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Berthelot S, Coulmont M (2004) ISO 14000–a profitable investment? CMA Manage 78(7):36–39Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai S, Jun M, Yang Z (2006) The impact of interorganizational internet communication on purchasing performance: a study of chinese manufacturing firms. J Suppl Chain Manage Summer 16–39Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi T, Hartley J (1996) An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. J Oper Manage 14:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corbett C (2006) Global diffusion of ISO 9000 certification through supply chains. Manuf Ser Oper Manage 8(4):330–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Council of Logistics Management (CLM) (1998) What it’s all about. Council of Logistics Management, Oak BrookGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Corbett CJ, Montes-Sancho MJ, Kirsch DA (2005) The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: an empirical analysis. Manage Sci 51:1046–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curkovic S, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA (2005) Identifying the factors which affect the decision to attain ISO 14001. J Energy 30(8):1387–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darnall N (2006) Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Bus Soc 45(3):354–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R (2008) Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Bus Strat Environ 17(1):30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis B (2004) One standard fits all. Prof Eng 17:43–45Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drake MJ, Ferguson ME (2008) Closed-loop supply chain management for global sustainability. In: Stoner JA, Wankel C (eds) Global sustainability initiatives: new models and new approaches. Chapter 9. pp 171–190 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eisenhardt K (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14:532–550Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    European Parliament and Council of the European Union (European Parliament) (2003a) Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. Official J European Union, Legislation Series. No. 37, pp 19–23Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    European Parliament and Council of the European Union (European Parliament) (2003b) Directive 2003/108/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 December 2003 amending Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Official J European Union, Legislation Series. No. 345, pp 106–107Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fassoula E (2005) Reverse logistics as a means of reducing the cost of quality. Total Qual Manag 16(5):631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleischmann M (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garfinkel SL, Shelat A (2003) Remembrance of data passed: a study of disk sanitization practise. IEEE Secur Priv 1(1)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Association of Electronics Recyclers (IAER) (2003) IAER electronics recycling industry reportGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jayaraman V, Ross A, Agrawal A (2008) Role of information technology and collaboration in reverse logistics supply chains. Int J Logist: Res Appl 11(6):409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jung LB, Bartel T (1998) An industry approach to consumer recycling: the San Jose project. In: Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment p 36–41Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kang H, Schoenung J (2005) Electronic waste recycling: a review of the U.S infrastructure and technology options. Resour Conserv Recy 45:368–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kannan G, Haq A, Sasikumar P, Arunachalam S (2008) Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modelling and analytic hierarchy process. Int J Manage Decis Making 9(2):163–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kartha CP (2004) A comparison of ISO 9000:2000 quality system Standards, QS 9000, ISO/TS 16949 and Baldrige criteria. TQM Magazine 16:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krikke H, Blance I, van de Velde S (2004) Product modularity and the design of closed-loop supply chains. Calif Manage Rev 46:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee H (2004) The triple A supply chain. Harv Bus Rev 82:102–112Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liker JK, Choi TY (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus Rev 32:104–113Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCutcheon D, Meridith J (1993) Conducting case study research in operations management. J Oper Manage 11(3):239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miles MB, Huberman M (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2005) Recycling of specified kinds of home appliances at municipalities. Online at http://www.env.go.jp/en/press/2005/1027a.html
  32. 32.
    Moore G (1991) Crossing the chasm. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nagurney A, Toyasaki F (2005) Reverse supply chain management and electronic waste recylcling: a mulitnetwork equilibrium framework for E-cycling. Transport Res E 41:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nakagawa L (2006) Toxic trade: the real cost of electronics waste exports from the United States. In: Cassara A, Damassa T (eds) Earth trends environmental essay competitionGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Northeast Recycling Council, Inc (NERC). Setting up and operating electronics recycling/reuse programs: a manual for municipalities and counties; March 2002. Cited within Kang, H. and Schoenung, J. 2005. Electronic waste recycling: a review of the U.S. infrastructure and technology options. Resour Conserv Recy 45:368–400Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003) Working Group on Waste Prevention and recycling. Environmentally sound management (ESM) of waste (Output area 2.3.4) Project Fact SheetGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Parlikad A, McFarlane D, Fleisch E, Gross S (2003) Role of product identity in end-of-life decision making, White Paper, Auto-ID Center, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Plambeck E, Wang Q (2009) Effects of E-waste regulation on new product introduction. Manage Sci 55(3):333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rondinelli D, Vastag G (2000) Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of environmental management systems. Eur Manage J 18(5):499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rowland-Jones R, Pryde M, Cresser M (2005) An evaluation of current environmental management systems as indicators of environmental performance. Manage Environ Qual 16(3):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Spring T (2003) Hard drives exposed. PC World. Accessed June of 2011. http://www.pcworld.com/article/110012/hard_drives_exposed.html
  42. 42.
    Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) (2004a) Fifth Annual Computer Report CardGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) (2004b) Poison PCs and Toxic TVs: E-waste Tsunami to Roll Across the US: Are We Prepared?. San Jose, SVTCGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Toffel MW (2003) The growing strategic importance of end-of-life product management. Calif Manage Rev 45(3):102–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    United Nations Environment Programme, (UNEP) Secretariat of the Basel Convention (1989) Basel convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposalGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    United Nations Environment Programme, (UNEP) Secretariat of the Basel Convention (2006) Parties to the basel convention. Online at http://www.basel.int/ratif/frsetmain.php. Accessed. Feb 2006
  47. 47.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2000) Electronic reuse and recycling infrastructure development in Massachusetts, EPA–901-R-00-002Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Office of the Inspector General. Multiple Actions Taken to Address Electronic Waste, But EPA Needs to Provide Clear National Direction, Report No. 2004-P-00028Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008a) Fact sheet: management of electronic waste in the United States. EPA530-F-08-014Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008b) Municipal solid waste generation, recycling and disposal in the United States, facts and figures for 2008Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Uzumeri MV (1997) ISO 9000 and other management meta standards: principles for management practice. Acad Manage Execut 21–36Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Viadiu F, Saizarbitoria I (2006) ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 standards: an international diffusion model. Int J Oper Prod Manage 26(1/2):141–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zuidwijk R, Krikke H (2008) Strategic response to EEE returns: product eco-design or new recovery process? Eur J Oper Res 191:1206–1222MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zoeteman B, Krikke H, Venselaar J (2010) Handing WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:415–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duquesne UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations