Advertisement

A Framework for Evaluating the Social Responsibility Quality of Reverse Logistics

  • Ioannis E. Nikolaou
  • Konstantinos I. Evangelinos
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter proposes the combination of basic principles of corporate social responsibility (CSR) with reverse logistics (RL) systems as a means of developing a social responsibility quality framework for evaluating RL procedures. More specifically, this chapter provides an overall framework including indicators for measuring reverse logistics social responsibility quality based on the triple bottom line approach (namely economic, environmental, and social aspects). This framework helps to tackle the weakness of the present environmental and sustainable RL systems. These are mainly based on measuring a limited number of social aspects, which are necessary for having a clearer picture of the quality performance of RL systems. The suggested framework could also play a critical role in measuring the contribution of a firm to sustainable development quality within the RL context.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Supply Chain Supply Chain Management Reverse Logistics Global Reporting Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ravi V, Shankar R (2005) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72:1011–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gonzalez-Torre PL, Adenso-Diaz B, Artiba H (2004) Environmental and reverse logistics policies in European bottling and packaging firms. Int J Prod Econ 88:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Subramanian R, Talbot B, Gupta S (2010) An approach to integrating environmental considerations within managerial decision-making. J Ind Ecol 14(3):378–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottberg A, Morris J, Pollard S, Mark-Herbert C, Cook M (2006) Producer responsibility, waste minimization and the WEEE directive: case studies in eco-design from the European lighting sector. Sci Total Environ 359:38–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP, Minner S (2002) An environmental analysis of the reverse supply chain of SLI batteries. Resour Conserv Recycl 36:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Georgiadis P, Vlachos D (2003) Analysis of the dynamic impact of environmental policies on reverse logistics. Oper Res Int J 3(2):123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Presley A, Meade L, Sarkis J (2007) A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4595–4620MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciliberti F, Pontrandolfo P, Scozzi B (2008) Logistics social responsibility: standard adoption and practices in Italian companies. Int J Prod Econ 113:88–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malony MJ, Brown ME (2006) Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry. J Bus Ethics 68:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teunter RH (2001) A reverse logistics valuation method for inventory control. Int J Prod Res 39(9):2023–2035MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu TL, Sheu J-B, Huang K-H (2002) A reverse logistics cost minimization model for the treatment of hazardous wastes. Transp Res Part E 38:457–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2005) Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Comput Ind Eng 48:327–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walker J, Di Sisto L, McBain D (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purch Supply Manag 14:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt M, Schwegler R (2008) A recursive ecological indicator system for the supply chain of a company. J Clean Prod 16:1658–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tsoulfas GT, Pappis CP (2008) A model for supply chains environmental performance analysis and decision making. J Clean Prod 16:1647–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu H-J, Dunn SC (1995) Environmental responsible logistics systems. Int J Phys Distrib Logist 25(2):20–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Srivastrava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar S, Putnam V (2008) Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industry sectors. Int J Prod Econ 115:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarkis J, Helms MM, Hervani AA (2010) Reverse logistics and social sustainability. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17 (6):337–354Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar S, Malegeant P (2006) Strategy alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization. Technovation 26:1127–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pagell M, Wu Z, Murthy NN (2007) The supply chain implications of recycling. Bus Horiz 50:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarkis J (2003) A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 11:397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee AHI, Kang H-Y, Hsu C-F, Hung HC (2009) A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl 36:7917–7927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Humphreys PK, Wong YK, Chan FTS (2003) Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. J Mater Process Technol 138:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Presley AR, Sarkis J, Liles DH (2000) A soft systems methodology approach for product and process innovation. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 47(3):379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kannan G, Pokharel S, Kumar PS (2009) A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resour Conserv Recycl 54:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Efendigil T, Onuut S, Knogar E (2008) A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistic provider in the presence of vagueness. Comput Ind Eng 54:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neto JQF, Wlater G, Bloemhof J, van Nunen JAEE, Spengel T (2009) From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the WEE case. Int J Prod Res 1–19Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gupta A, Evans GW (2009) A goal programming model for the operation for the operation of closed-loop supply chains. Eng Optim 41(8):713–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar S, Yamaoka T (2007) System dynamics study of the Japanese automotive industry closed-loop supply chain. J Manuf Technol Manag 18(2):115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Georgiadis P, Besiou M (2010) Environmental and economical sustainability of WEEE closed-loop supply chains with recycling: a system dynamics analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 47:475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Georgiadis P, Vlachos D (2004) The effect of environmental parameters on product recovery. Eur J Oper Res 157:449–464MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dowlatshahi S (2010) A cost-benefit analysis for the design and implementation of reverse logistics systems: case studies approach. Int J Prod Res 48(5):1361–1380MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Serrato MA, Ryan SM, Gaytan J (2007) A Markov decision model to evaluate outsourcing in reverse logistics. Int J Prod Res 45(18):4289–4315MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fleischmann M, Krikke HR, Dekker R, Flapper SDP (2000) A characterization of logistics networks for product recovery. Omega 28:653–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dowlatshahi S (2005) A strategic framework for the design and implementation of remanufacturing operations in reverse logistics. Int J Prod Res 43(16):3455–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fleischmann M, Beullens P, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J, van Wassenhove L (2001) The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):156–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pokharel S, Mutha A (2009) Perspectives in reverse logistics: a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, van der Laan E, van Nunen JAEE, van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Castka P, Balzarova MA (2007) A critical look on quality through CSR lenses: key challenges stemming from the development of ISO 26000. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 24(7):738–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kok P, van der Wiele T, McKenna R, Brown A (2001) A corporate social responsibility audit with a quality management framework. J Bus Ethics 31:285297Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carriga E, Mele D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Castka P, Bamber CJ, Bamber DJ, Sharp JM (2004) Integrating corporate social responsibility of a feasible CSR management system framework. TQM Mag 16(3):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McAdam R, Leonard D (2003) Corporate social responsibility in a total quality management context: opportunities for sustainable growth. Corp Gov 3(4):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with the forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oskarsson K, von Malmborg F (2005) Integrated management systems as a corporate response to sustainable development. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 12:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Isaksson R (2006) Total quality management for sustainable development process based system models. Bus Process Manag J 12(5):632–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Karapetrovic S, Willborn W (1998) Integration of quality and environmental management systems. TQM Mag 10(3):204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dixon RD, Mousa GA, Woodhead A (2005) The role of environmental initiatives in encouraging companies to encourage in environmental reporting. Eur Manag J 23(6):702–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weeks K, Gao H, Alidaeec B, Rana DS (2010) An empirical study of impacts of production mix, product route efficiencies on operations performance and profitability: a reverse logistics approach. Int J Prod Res 48(4):1087–1104MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Halldorsson A, Kotzab H, Skhott-Larsen T (2009) Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse? Logist Res 1:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis E. Nikolaou
    • 1
  • Konstantinos I. Evangelinos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringDemocritus University of ThraceXanthiGreece
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of the AegeanMytiliniGreece

Personalised recommendations