Advertisement

A Quality Framework in Closed Loop Supply Chains: Opportunities for Value Creation

  • Umut Çorbacıoğlu
  • Erwin A. van der LaanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Quality issues and “uncertainties” are encountered in almost every aspect of closed loop supply chains (CLSCs). In this chapter, we analyze the CLSC processes with a focus on quality. We find that quality of returned products is the major source of uncertainty and thus a major determinant of value in CLSCs. However, we observe that there is a gap in the literature when it comes to identifying and properly defining all relevant quality dimensions and the ways in which they affect CLSC processes. In our chapter, we start with an investigation of existing definitions of quality, link them to the different stages of CLSCs, and propose a new framework summarizing the integration of quality within CLSC processes. We also relate our framework to other frameworks that can be found in the literature and show how the former may help to improve value creation in CLSCs.

Keywords

Supply Chain Total Quality Management Product Recovery Quality Framework Closed Loop Supply Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Dutch Institute for Advanced Logistics (DINALOG; www.dinalog.nl) for their support of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN (2009) The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res 57(1):10–18zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar V, Shirodkar PS, Camelio JA, Sutherland JW (2010) Value flow characterization during product lifecycle to assist in recovery decisions. Int J Prod Res 45(18–19):4555–4572Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Visich JK, Li Suhong, Khumawala BM (2007) Enhancing product recovery value in closed-loop supply chains with RFID. J Manag Issues 19(3):436–452Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zuidwijk R, Krikke HR (2008) Strategic response to EEE returns: product eco-design or new recovery processes? Eur J Oper Res 191(3):1206–1222MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Brito M (2003) Managing reverse logistics or reverse logistics management? ERIM Ph.D. series research in management, vol 35. Erasmus research institute of management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleischmann M, Krikke HR, Dekker R, Flapper SDP (2000) A characterization of logistics network for product recovery. Omega 28(6):653–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geyer R, Jackson T (2004) Supply loops and their constraints: the industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. Calif Manag Rev 46(2):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guide VDR (2000) Production planning and control for remanufacturing. J Operat Manag 18:467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bounds G, Yorks L, Adams M, Ranney G (1994) Beyond total quality management: toward the emerging paradigm. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thierry MC (1995) An analysis of the impact of product recovery management on manufacturing companies. Ph.D. series in general management, vol 26, Rotterdam school of management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (2001) Managing product returns for manufacturing. Prod Operat Manag 10:142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guide VDR, Jayaraman V (2000) Product acquisition management: current industry practice and a proposed framework. Int J Prod Res 38(10):3779–3800zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Blanc HM (2006) Closing loops in supply chain management: designing reverse supply chains for end-of-life vehicles, Ph.D. Thesis. Tilburg University, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krikke HR, Le Blanc HM Van de Velde SL (2004) Product modularity and the design of closed loop supply chains. Calif Manag Rev 46(2):23–39Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garvin D (1988) Managing quality: the strategic and competitive edge. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2000) Factory physics. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blackburn JD, Guide VDR, Souza GC, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Reverse supply chains for commercial returns. Calif Manag Rev 46(2):6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krikke H (20090 Opposites attract: a happy marriage of forward and reverse supply chain. Inaugural speech, Open University, HeerlenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krikke HR, van Harten A, Schuur PC (1999) Business case oce: reverse logistic network redesign for Copiers. OR Spektrum 21:381–409zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (2003) Business aspects of closed loop supply chains. In: Guide VDR, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) Business aspects of closed loop supply chains. Carnegie Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh, pp 17–43Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thierry MC, Salomon M, van Nunen JAEE, van Wassenhove LN (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery management. Calif Manag Rev 37(2):114–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Debo LG, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Tyre recovery: the retread Co case. In: Flapper SDP, van Nunen JAEE, van Wassenhove LN (eds) Managing closed-loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toffel MW (2004) Strategic management of product recovery. Calif Manag Rev 46(2):120–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Driesch H, van Oyen HE, Flapper SDP (2005) Recovery of car engines: the Mercedes-Benz case. In: Flapper SDP, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) Managing closed-loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seitz MA (2007) A critical assessment of motives for product recovery: the case of engine remanufacturing. J Clean Product 15(11–12):1147–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klausner M, Hendrickson CT (2000) Reverse-logistics strategy for product take back. Interfaces 30(3):156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Quintiq Applications B.V.Den BoschThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations