Skip to main content

Managing Design Constraints in Synthesis Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
CIRP Design 2012
  • 1591 Accesses

Abstract

Constraints in the context of design synthesis represent various bounds on acceptable technical systems. In early design stages, constraints must be carefully managed in order to keep synthesis on the right track. This paper presents a new constraints management model which is developed based on a domain-independent synthesis reasoning framework. Within the proposed model, design constraints are classified into four types: internal input constraint, external input constraint, internal system constraint, and external system constraint. For each type of design constraints, the model prescribes a respective management strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lu SC-Y, Liu A (2011) A Synthesis Decision Framework for Early-stage Innovative Design. Proceeding of 2011 CIRP Design

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: the impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J Consum Res 32(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Costello F, Mark K (2000) Efficient creativity: constraint-guided conceptual combination. Cogn Sci 24(2):299–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stokes PD (2001) Variability, constraints, and creativity: shedding light on claude Monet. Am Psychol 56(4):355–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeon H (2000) Dynamic constraint management in collective design. Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldratt E (1999) Theory of constraints. North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu SC-Y, Liu A (2011) Subjectivity and objectivity in design decisions. CIRP 7 Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York, p 401

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scott MJ, Antonsson EK (1999) Arrow’s theorem and engineering design. Decis Making Res Eng Des 11(4):218–228

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shpitalni M, Lipson H (1997) Automatic reasoning for design under geometrical constraints. CIRP Ann: Manuf Technol 46(1):85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaffar J, Maher MJ (1994) Constraint logic programming: a survey. J Logic Program 19(20):503–581

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lottaz C, Smith IFC, Robert NY, Faltings BV (2000) Constraint-based support for negotiation in collaborative design. Artif Intell Eng 14:261–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. C.-Y. Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lu, S.CY., Liu, A. (2013). Managing Design Constraints in Synthesis Reasoning. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) CIRP Design 2012. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4507-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4507-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4506-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4507-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics