Advertisement

Behaviour Simulation in Computer Aided Product Concept Sketching

Conference paper

Abstract

In the product conceptualization phase of design, sketches are often used for exploration of diverse behaviour patterns of the components to achieve the required functionality. This paper presents a method to animate the sketch produced using a tablet interface to aid verification of the desired behaviour. A sketch is a spatial organization of strokes whose perceptual organization helps one to visually interpret its components and their interconnections. A Gestalt based segmentation followed by interactive grouping and articulation, presented in this paper, enables one to use a mechanism simulation framework to animate the sketch in a “pick and drag” mode to visualize different configurations of the product and gain insight into the product’s behaviour.

Keywords

Mental Simulation Mental Workload Product Concept Stroke Group Physical Prototype 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fish J, Scrivener S (1990) Amplifying the mind’s eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23(1):117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goel V (1991) Sketches of thought. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldschmidt G (1991) The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Res J 4(2)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cross N (1999) Natural intelligence in design. Des Stud 20:25–39MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schon DA, Wiggins G (1992) Kinds of seeing and their function in designing. Des Stud 13(2):135156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sutherland IE (1964) Sketchpad: a man-machine graphical communication system. In DAC’64: proceedings of the SHARE design automation workshop, 6.329–6.346Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Do E, Gross MD (1996) Demonstrating the electronic cocktail napkin: a paper-like interface for early design. Conferrence on human factors in computing systems CHI’96, pp 5–6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sezgin TM, Davis R (2007) Sketch interpretation using multiscale models of temporal patterns. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 27(1):28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hammond T, Davis R (2006) Tahuti: a geometrical sketch recognition system for UML class diagrams. In ACM SIGGRAPH, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kara LB, Stahovich TF (2004) Sim-U-Sketch: a sketch-based interface for simulink. Proceedings of AVI-2004, pp 354–357Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jorge JA, Fonseca MJ (2000) A simple approach to recognise geometric shapes interactively. In GREC ‘99, London, pp 266–276Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diehl H, Mller F, Lindemann U (2004) From raw 3D-sketches to exact CAD product models—concept for an assistant system, sketch based interfaces and modelling. UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeleznik R, Herndon K, Hughes J (1996) SKETCH: an interface for sketching 3D scenes. Proceedings SIGGRAPH, pp 163–170Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Igarashi T, Matsuoka S, Tanaka H (1999) Teddy: a sketching interface for 3D freeform design. In SIGGRAPH’99, pp 409–416Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kara LB, Stahovich TF (2005) An image-based, trainable symbol recognizer for hand-drawn sketches. Comput Graph 29(4):501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olsen L, Samavati F, Sousa MC, Jorge JA (2009) Sketch-based modeling. Surv Comput Graph 33:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saund E (2003) Finding perceptually closed paths in sketches and drawings. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 25(4):475–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wertheimer W (1923) A source book of gestalt psychology, chapter laws of organization in perceptual forms. Routledge, London, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Onkar P, Sen D (2010) Functional segmentation of strokes for product sketch understanding. Int J Shape Model 1:9–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barla P, Thollot J, Sillion FX (2005) Geometric clustering for line drawing simplification In ACM SIGGRAPHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pahl G, Beitz W, Wallace K (1996), Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Babbage C (1826) On a method of expressing by signs the action of machinery. Phil Trans R Soc London 116(1/3):250–265Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alvarado C, Davis R (2001) Resolving ambiguities to create a natural computer-based sketching environment IJCAI, pp 1365–1374Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Murugappan S, Ramani K (2009) Feasy: a sketch-based interface integrating structural analysis in early design. Proceedings of ASME IDTC/CIE conferenceGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Sommers P (1984) Drawing and cognition. Cambridge university press, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations