Advertisement

Temporary Intravascular Shunt in Complex Vascular Injury

  • Ding Wei-weiEmail author
  • Li Jie-shou
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads

Abstract

Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both civilian and military traumatic patients. Vascular injuries, which literally threaten both life and limb, have always constituted a serious problem in the surgical management of traumatic conditions. In military operations, medical care is often delivered in an austere and dangerous environment with limited availability of resources. In World War I, when vascular surgical skills had not been popularized, ligation of vascular injuries was an expedient and useful option, with a resultant amputation rate as high as 72.5 % [1]. Of the 2,471 arterial injuries studied during World War II by DeBakey and Simeone [2], proximal ligation was used, with an amputation rate of 48.9 %. Advances in the surgical physiology, techniques, and armamentarium by the end of World War II led to a shift of emphasis from primary control of the hemorrhage to efforts aimed at preserving the viability and function of the extremities. During the Korean conflict, Hughes [3] reported that the amputation rate in a series of 269 patients decreased to 13 %, although popliteal artery injury resulted in a 38 % amputation rate. This figure was not significantly better in the Vietnam War, although the amputation rate for popliteal artery injury had decreased to 29.5 % [4].

Keywords

Vascular Injury Ischemic Time Warm Ischemic Time Amputation Rate Systemic Anticoagulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher GW. Acute arterial injuries treated by the United States Army Medical Service in Vietnam, 1965–1966. J Trauma. 1967;7:844–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeBakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg. 1946;123:534–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes CW. Acute vascular trauma in Korean War casualties; an analysis of 180 cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1954;99:91–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. J Trauma. 1970;10:359–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snyder 3rd WH. Vascular injuries near the knee: an updated series and overview of the problem. Surgery. 1982;91:502–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chambers LW, Green DJ, Sample K, et al. Tactical surgical intervention with temporary shunting of peripheral vascular trauma sustained during Operation Iraqi Freedom: one unit’s experience. J Trauma. 2006;61:824–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nalbandian MM, Maldonado TS, Cushman J, Jacobowitz GJ, Lamparello PJ, Riles TS. Successful limb reperfusion using prolonged intravascular shunting in a case of an unstable trauma patient – a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2004;38:375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuffier M. French surgery in 1915. Br J Surg. 1916;4:420–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matheson NM, Murray G. Recent advances and experimental work in conservative vascular surgery. In: Hamilton-Bailey, editors. Surgery of modern Warfie. vol 1. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1941. p. 324–7.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eger M, Golcman L, Goldstein A, Hirsch M. The use of a temporary shunt in the management of arterial vascular injuries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971;132:67–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McHenry TP, Holcomb JB, Aoki N, Lindsey RW. Fractures with major vascular injuries from gunshot wounds: implications of surgical sequence. J Trauma. 2002;53:717–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reber PU, Patel AG, Sapio NL, Ris HB, Beck M, Kniemeyer HW. Selective use of temporary intravascular shunts in coincident vascular and orthopedic upper and lower limb trauma. J Trauma. 1999;47:72–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Husain AK, Khandeparkar JM, Tendolkar AG, Magotra RA, Parulkar GB. Temporary intravascular shunts for peripheral vascular trauma. J Postgrad Med. 1992;38:68–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barros D’Sa AA. The rationale for arterial and venous shunting in the management of limb vascular injuries. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1989;3:471–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalil IM, Livingston DH. Intravascular shunts in complex lower limb trauma. J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:582–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reilly PM, Rotondo MF, Carpenter JP, Sherr SA, Schwab CW. Temporary vascular continuity during damage control: intraluminal shunting for proximal superior mesenteric artery injury. J Trauma. 1995;39:757–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindberg B, Norback B, Svendsen P, Synek V. Carotid endarterectomy. A review of 104 operations. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;16:161–70.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilkinson JM, Rochester JR, Sivaguru A, Cameron IC, Fisher R, Beard JD. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity, embolisation, and neurological outcome during carotid endarterectomy: a prospective comparison of the Javid and the Pruitt-Inahara shunts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14:399–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rasmussen TE, Clouse WD, Jenkins DH, Peck MA, Eliason JL, Smith DL. The use of temporary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the management of wartime vascular injury. J Trauma. 2006;61:8–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayes PD, Vainas T, Hartley S, et al. The Pruitt-Inahara shunt maintains mean middle cerebral artery velocities within 10 % of preoperative values during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:299–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parry NG, Feliciano DV, Burke RM, et al. Management and short-term patency of lower extremity venous injuries with various repairs. Am J Surg. 2003;186:631–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hossny A. Blunt popliteal artery injury with complete lower limb ischemia: is routine use of temporary intraluminal arterial shunt justified? J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:61–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nunley JA, Koman LA, Urbaniak JR. Arterial shunting as an adjunct to major limb revascularization. Ann Surg. 1981;193:271–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rozycki GS, Tremblay LN, Feliciano DV, McClelland WB. Blunt vascular trauma in the extremity: diagnosis, management, and outcome. J Trauma. 2003;55:814–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Granchi T, Schmittling Z, Vasquez J, Schreiber M, Wall M. Prolonged use of intraluminal arterial shunts without systemic anticoagulation. Am J Surg. 2000;180:493–6; discussion 6–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malan E, Tattoni G. Physio- and anatomo-pathology of acute ischemia of the extremities. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1963;4:212–25.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johansen K, Hedges G. Successful limb reperfusion by temporary arterial shunt during a 950-mile air transfer: case report. J Trauma. 1989;29:1289–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ding W, Wu X, Gong G, Meng Q, Ni L, Li J. Establishment of an acute superior mesenteric artery injury model for damage control surgery. J Surg Res. 2009;152:249–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ding W, Wu X, Meng Q, et al. Time course study on the use of temporary intravascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in a superior mesenteric artery injury model. J Trauma. 2010;68:409–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ding W, Ji W, Wu X, Li N, Li J. Prolonged indwelling time of temporary vascular shunts is associated with increased endothelial injury in the porcine mesenteric artery. J Trauma. 2011;70:1464–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aldridge SD, Badellino MM, Malaspina PJ, et al. Extended intravascular shunting in an experimental model of vascular injury. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997;38:183–6.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dawson DL, Putnam AT, Light JT, et al. Temporary arterial shunts to maintain limb perfusion after arterial injury: an animal study. J Trauma. 1999;47:64–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harkin DW, D’Sa AA, Yassin MM, et al. Reperfusion injury is greater with delayed restoration of venous outflow in concurrent arterial and venous limb injury. Br J Surg. 2000;87:734–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sagraves SG, Toschlog EA, Rotondo MF. Damage control surgery – the intensivist’s role. J Intensive Care Med. 2006;21:5–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wagner WH, Calkins ER, Weaver FA, Goodwin JA, Myles RA, Yellin AE. Blunt popliteal artery trauma: one hundred consecutive injuries. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7:736–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hafez HM, Woolgar J, Robbs JV. Lower extremity arterial injury: results of 550 cases and review of risk factors associated with limb loss. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:1212–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Daugherty ME, Sachatello CR, Ernst CB. Improved treatment of popliteal arterial injuries using anticoagulation and extra-anatomic reconstruction. Arch Surg. 1978;113:1317–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hardy JD, Raju S, Neely WA, Berry DW. Aortic and other arterial injuries. Ann Surg. 1975;181:640–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    O’Donnell Jr TF, Brewster DC, Darling RC, Veen H, Waltman AA. Arterial injuries associated with fractures and/or dislocations of the knee. J Trauma. 1977;17:775–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Freischlag JA, Sise M, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Hye RJ, Sedwitz MM. Vascular complications associated with orthopedic procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989;169:147–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Majeski JA, Gauto A. Management of peripheral arterial vascular injuries with a Javid shunt. Am J Surg. 1979;138:324–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197:532–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Burch JM, Ortiz VB, Richardson RJ, Martin RR, Mattox KL, Jordan Jr GL. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg. 1992;215:476–83; discussion 83–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morris Jr JA, Eddy VA, Blinman TA, Rutherford EJ, Sharp KW. The staged celiotomy for trauma. Issues in unpacking and reconstruction. Ann Surg. 1993;217:576–84; discussion 84–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aucar JA, Hirshberg A. Damage control for vascular injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:853–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Huynh TT, Pham M, Griffin LW, et al. Management of distal femoral and popliteal arterial injuries: an update. Am J Surg. 2006;192:773–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Institute of People’s Liberation Army for General SurgeryThe Clinical College of the Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Jinling HospitalMedical School of Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations